Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow E2E suite test to run against a remote cluster #4207

Closed
squakez opened this issue Mar 31, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #4253
Closed

Allow E2E suite test to run against a remote cluster #4207

squakez opened this issue Mar 31, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #4253
Assignees

Comments

@squakez
Copy link
Contributor

squakez commented Mar 31, 2023

With a limited resource machine, then, you have no other option to delegate E2E work remotely. So, I am thinking that maybe we can introduce a couple of environment variables when installing the operator in the E2E suite [1] which can control the following parameters:

      --operator-image string                       Set the operator Image used for the operator deployment
      --operator-image-pull-policy string           Set the operator ImagePullPolicy used for the operator deployment

so, the final user can override them to look for a custom image (like in your case) or controlling the pull policy. I am opening an issue to work on this separately, and feel free to contribute to it as well. In the while, if you are not able to run things locally, I suggest to push the changes and have a look at the checks result. Fortunately now the time to complete a full cycle of test is less that 1 hour.

[1]

cmdArgs = []string{command, "-n", namespace, "--operator-id", operatorID}

Originally posted by @squakez in #4190 (comment)

@squakez
Copy link
Contributor Author

squakez commented Mar 31, 2023

FYI @mertdotcc

@squakez squakez self-assigned this Apr 13, 2023
squakez added a commit to squakez/camel-k that referenced this issue Apr 13, 2023
squakez added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 14, 2023
@mertdotcc
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you @squakez! Can't wait to try it out!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants