-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GH-44114: [R] Add Rocky and opensuse to the allowlist for libarrow binaries #44124
Conversation
|
Is there a reason to be specific with |
I discovered this when chatting with someone from the Posit Package Manager, and that's the string they got when they ran the |
I see but with |
r/tools/nixlibs.R
Outdated
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ check_allowlist <- function(os, allowed = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apa | |||
# Try a remote allowlist so that we can add/remove without a release | |||
suppressWarnings(readLines(allowed)), | |||
# Fallback to default: allowed only on Ubuntu and CentOS/RHEL | |||
error = function(e) c("ubuntu", "centos", "redhat", "rhel") | |||
error = function(e) c("ubuntu", "centos", "redhat", "rhel", "rocky", "opensuse-leap") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't recall the history on this, but the local copy of the allowlist should be present here, right? Can we fall back to readLines("nixlibs-allowlist.txt")
(or whatever path it is relative to cwd)? That way we only have to track this in one place.
Also we should update the comment on the line above.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, of course
Ah, right right. Ok I've changed it to |
Co-authored-by: eitsupi <[email protected]>
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 0707c04. There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉 The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 3 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. |
Rationale for this change
Add two distros not checked on CRAN to our allow list for easier binary installs
What changes are included in this PR?
Added to distro names
Are these changes tested?
These configurations are tested elsewhere, the real test will come later if CRAN somehow runs these covertly
Are there any user-facing changes?
Faster, more reliably installs without intervention