-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GH-41470: [C++] Reuse deduplication logic for direct registration #41466
GH-41470: [C++] Reuse deduplication logic for direct registration #41466
Conversation
Thanks for opening a pull request! If this is not a minor PR. Could you open an issue for this pull request on GitHub? https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/new/choose Opening GitHub issues ahead of time contributes to the Openness of the Apache Arrow project. Then could you also rename the pull request title in the following format?
or
In the case of PARQUET issues on JIRA the title also supports:
See also: |
@github-actions crossbow submit -g homebrew |
Revision: e798267 Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-05f8f5ff1f
|
@github-actions crossbow submit java |
@github-actions crossbow submit -g java-jars |
|
Revision: e798267 Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-9c4f4373f4 |
@github-actions crossbow submit java-jars |
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ jobs: | |||
fail-fast: false | |||
matrix: | |||
platform: | |||
- { runs_on: ["macos-latest"], arch: "x86_64"} | |||
- { runs_on: ["macos-13"], arch: "x86_64"} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
macos-latest == macos-14 now so if we want amd64 we have to explicitly request macos-13
Revision: 2fd3fcc Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-319edba519
|
The error doesn't seem related to filesystem anymore: https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/actions/runs/8903205653/job/24451424677#step:6:16247 I'm not sure what it means though |
@lidavidm this seems to be from the recent maven build update? |
We can merge this regardless and @vibhatha can file a new ticket. |
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 7 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 14c54bb. There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉 The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 22 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. |
…on (apache#41466) ### Rationale for this change As observed in apache#41309 a crossbow job on mac is failing due to duplicate registration of a factory for the file:// scheme ### What changes are included in this PR? Deduplication of registered filesystem factories is applied to direct registration as well as when merging registries. ### Are these changes tested? No, we just need to verify that the problematic crossbow job is repaired. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No * GitHub Issue: apache#41470 Lead-authored-by: Benjamin Kietzman <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: David Li <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Li <[email protected]>
…on (apache#41466) ### Rationale for this change As observed in apache#41309 a crossbow job on mac is failing due to duplicate registration of a factory for the file:// scheme ### What changes are included in this PR? Deduplication of registered filesystem factories is applied to direct registration as well as when merging registries. ### Are these changes tested? No, we just need to verify that the problematic crossbow job is repaired. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No * GitHub Issue: apache#41470 Lead-authored-by: Benjamin Kietzman <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: David Li <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Li <[email protected]>
…on (apache#41466) ### Rationale for this change As observed in apache#41309 a crossbow job on mac is failing due to duplicate registration of a factory for the file:// scheme ### What changes are included in this PR? Deduplication of registered filesystem factories is applied to direct registration as well as when merging registries. ### Are these changes tested? No, we just need to verify that the problematic crossbow job is repaired. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No * GitHub Issue: apache#41470 Lead-authored-by: Benjamin Kietzman <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: David Li <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Li <[email protected]>
…on (apache#41466) ### Rationale for this change As observed in apache#41309 a crossbow job on mac is failing due to duplicate registration of a factory for the file:// scheme ### What changes are included in this PR? Deduplication of registered filesystem factories is applied to direct registration as well as when merging registries. ### Are these changes tested? No, we just need to verify that the problematic crossbow job is repaired. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No * GitHub Issue: apache#41470 Lead-authored-by: Benjamin Kietzman <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: David Li <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Li <[email protected]>
…on (apache#41466) ### Rationale for this change As observed in apache#41309 a crossbow job on mac is failing due to duplicate registration of a factory for the file:// scheme ### What changes are included in this PR? Deduplication of registered filesystem factories is applied to direct registration as well as when merging registries. ### Are these changes tested? No, we just need to verify that the problematic crossbow job is repaired. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No * GitHub Issue: apache#41470 Lead-authored-by: Benjamin Kietzman <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: David Li <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Li <[email protected]>
Rationale for this change
As observed in #41309 a crossbow job on mac is failing due to duplicate registration of a factory for the file:// scheme
What changes are included in this PR?
Deduplication of registered filesystem factories is applied to direct registration as well as when merging registries.
Are these changes tested?
No, we just need to verify that the problematic crossbow job is repaired.
Are there any user-facing changes?
No