Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GH-35521: [C++] Hash null bitmap only if null count is 0 #35522

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 11, 2023
+23 −3
Merged

GH-35521: [C++] Hash null bitmap only if null count is 0 #35522

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
9cad50d
Only hash array data bitmaps if the null count is not 0
micah-white May 9, 2023
d10fe67
not working test
micah-white May 9, 2023
d55a593
fix nits and test
micah-white May 10, 2023
f4d0ac8
Testing nits: ensure better output on error, add comments
pitrou May 11, 2023
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 3 additions & 2 deletions cpp/src/arrow/scalar.cc
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -153,9 +153,10 @@ struct ScalarHashImpl {

Status ArrayHash(const ArrayData& a) {
RETURN_NOT_OK(StdHash(a.length) & StdHash(a.GetNullCount()));
if (a.buffers[0] != nullptr) {
if (a.GetNullCount() != 0 && a.buffers[0] != nullptr) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IIRC, it's also possible that a.buffers[0] == nullptr if all the elements are valid. Is it possible that we still get differing hashes in this case?

  • All elements valid and equal and validity bitmap present (would hash the validity bitmap)
  • All elements valid and equal and validity bitmap missing (would not hash the validity bitmap)

Copy link
Contributor Author

@micah-white micah-white May 10, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, that's the bug that I am trying to fix. Since both cases have the same semantic value, their hashes should be the same.

// We can't visit values without unboxing the whole array, so only hash
// the null bitmap for now.
// the null bitmap for now. Only hash the null bitmap if the null count
// is not 0 to ensure hash consistency.
RETURN_NOT_OK(BufferHash(*a.buffers[0]));
}
for (const auto& child : a.child_data) {
Expand Down
15 changes: 15 additions & 0 deletions cpp/src/arrow/scalar_test.cc
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1106,6 +1106,19 @@ class TestListScalar : public ::testing::Test {
ASSERT_RAISES(Invalid, scalar.ValidateFull());
}

void TestHashing() {
ScalarType empty_bitmap_scalar(ArrayFromJSON(int16(), "[1, 2, 3]"));
ASSERT_OK(empty_bitmap_scalar.ValidateFull());
ASSERT_TRUE(empty_bitmap_scalar.value->data()->buffers[0] == nullptr);

auto list_array = ArrayFromJSON(type_, "[[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, null]]");
ASSERT_OK_AND_ASSIGN(auto set_bitmap_scalar_uncasted, list_array->GetScalar(0));
auto set_bitmap_scalar = std::dynamic_pointer_cast<ScalarType>(set_bitmap_scalar_uncasted);
ASSERT_TRUE(set_bitmap_scalar != nullptr);
ASSERT_TRUE(set_bitmap_scalar->value->data()->buffers[0] != nullptr);
ASSERT_TRUE(empty_bitmap_scalar.hash() == set_bitmap_scalar->hash());
}

protected:
std::shared_ptr<DataType> type_;
std::shared_ptr<Array> value_;
Expand All @@ -1119,6 +1132,8 @@ TYPED_TEST(TestListScalar, Basics) { this->TestBasics(); }

TYPED_TEST(TestListScalar, ValidateErrors) { this->TestValidateErrors(); }

TYPED_TEST(TestListScalar, TestHashing) { this->TestHashing(); }

TEST(TestFixedSizeListScalar, ValidateErrors) {
const auto ty = fixed_size_list(int16(), 3);
FixedSizeListScalar scalar(ArrayFromJSON(int16(), "[1, 2, 5]"), ty);
Expand Down