Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[C++][CI] OpenSSL link error in Gandiva on macOS #36329

Closed
pitrou opened this issue Jun 27, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #36336
Closed

[C++][CI] OpenSSL link error in Gandiva on macOS #36329

pitrou opened this issue Jun 27, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #36336

Comments

@pitrou
Copy link
Member

pitrou commented Jun 27, 2023

Describe the bug, including details regarding any error messages, version, and platform.

As seen on CI:

Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
  "_EVP_MD_get_size", referenced from:
      gandiva::gdv_hash_using_openssl(long long, void const*, unsigned long, evp_md_st const*, unsigned int, int*) in libgandiva.a(hash_utils.cc.o)
ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64

https://github.com/apache/arrow/actions/runs/5390688418/jobs/9786417735#step:9:1716

Also, it would be nice if the CMake configure logs shows the architecture being targeted (perhaps CMAKE_SYSTEM_PROCESSOR?).

Component(s)

C++, Continuous Integration

@pitrou
Copy link
Member Author

pitrou commented Jun 27, 2023

cc @kou

@kou
Copy link
Member

kou commented Jun 27, 2023

Ah, sorry. I didn't take a look at this failure.

It's caused by mixing OpenSSL 1.1 and 3.0.
In this case, OpenSSL 3.0's include headers (they have #define EVP_MD_size EVP_MD_get_size) are used and OpenSSL 1.1's libraries (they provides EVP_MD_size not EVP_MD_get_size) are used.

kou added a commit to kou/arrow that referenced this issue Jun 28, 2023
GitHub Actions self-hosted runner for macOS has
/usr/local/include/openssl/ provided by OpenSSL 3 (`openssl@3`). Our
include paths have `... -isystem /usr/local/include -isystem
/usr/local/opt/[email protected]/include ...`. It means that
`/usr/local/include/openssl/...` is used for `#include <openssl/...>`.

If we mix OpenSSL 3 headers and OpenSSL 1.1 libraries, we may get some
problems such as a link error.

This uses OpenSSL 3 instead of OpenSSL 1.1 because GitHub Actions
self-hosted runner for macOS provides OpenSSL 3 by
/usr/local/include/openssl/. Note that `$(brew --prefix
openssl@3)/include` isn't linked as /usr/local/include/openssl` by
default. So I think that Homebrew GitHub Actions self-hosted runner
for macOS does it explicitly.

Other solution: Unlinking `/usr/local/include/openssl` by `brew unlink
openssl@3`. But there is no reason to use OpenSSL 1.1 for us. So this
PR doesn't use this solution.
laurentgo pushed a commit to laurentgo/arrow that referenced this issue Jun 28, 2023
GitHub Actions self-hosted runner for macOS has
/usr/local/include/openssl/ provided by OpenSSL 3 (`openssl@3`). Our
include paths have `... -isystem /usr/local/include -isystem
/usr/local/opt/[email protected]/include ...`. It means that
`/usr/local/include/openssl/...` is used for `#include <openssl/...>`.

If we mix OpenSSL 3 headers and OpenSSL 1.1 libraries, we may get some
problems such as a link error.

This uses OpenSSL 3 instead of OpenSSL 1.1 because GitHub Actions
self-hosted runner for macOS provides OpenSSL 3 by
/usr/local/include/openssl/. Note that `$(brew --prefix
openssl@3)/include` isn't linked as /usr/local/include/openssl` by
default. So I think that Homebrew GitHub Actions self-hosted runner
for macOS does it explicitly.

Other solution: Unlinking `/usr/local/include/openssl` by `brew unlink
openssl@3`. But there is no reason to use OpenSSL 1.1 for us. So this
PR doesn't use this solution.
laurentgo pushed a commit to laurentgo/arrow that referenced this issue Jun 28, 2023
GitHub Actions self-hosted runner for macOS has
/usr/local/include/openssl/ provided by OpenSSL 3 (`openssl@3`). Our
include paths have `... -isystem /usr/local/include -isystem
/usr/local/opt/[email protected]/include ...`. It means that
`/usr/local/include/openssl/...` is used for `#include <openssl/...>`.

If we mix OpenSSL 3 headers and OpenSSL 1.1 libraries, we may get some
problems such as a link error.

This uses OpenSSL 3 instead of OpenSSL 1.1 because GitHub Actions
self-hosted runner for macOS provides OpenSSL 3 by
/usr/local/include/openssl/. Note that `$(brew --prefix
openssl@3)/include` isn't linked as /usr/local/include/openssl` by
default. So I think that Homebrew GitHub Actions self-hosted runner
for macOS does it explicitly.

Other solution: Unlinking `/usr/local/include/openssl` by `brew unlink
openssl@3`. But there is no reason to use OpenSSL 1.1 for us. So this
PR doesn't use this solution.
@raulcd raulcd added the Priority: Blocker Marks a blocker for the release label Jun 28, 2023
laurentgo pushed a commit to laurentgo/arrow that referenced this issue Jun 28, 2023
GitHub Actions self-hosted runner for macOS has
/usr/local/include/openssl/ provided by OpenSSL 3 (`openssl@3`). Our
include paths have `... -isystem /usr/local/include -isystem
/usr/local/opt/[email protected]/include ...`. It means that
`/usr/local/include/openssl/...` is used for `#include <openssl/...>`.

If we mix OpenSSL 3 headers and OpenSSL 1.1 libraries, we may get some
problems such as a link error.

This uses OpenSSL 3 instead of OpenSSL 1.1 because GitHub Actions
self-hosted runner for macOS provides OpenSSL 3 by
/usr/local/include/openssl/. Note that `$(brew --prefix
openssl@3)/include` isn't linked as /usr/local/include/openssl` by
default. So I think that Homebrew GitHub Actions self-hosted runner
for macOS does it explicitly.

Other solution: Unlinking `/usr/local/include/openssl` by `brew unlink
openssl@3`. But there is no reason to use OpenSSL 1.1 for us. So this
PR doesn't use this solution.
laurentgo pushed a commit to laurentgo/arrow that referenced this issue Jun 28, 2023
GitHub Actions self-hosted runner for macOS has
/usr/local/include/openssl/ provided by OpenSSL 3 (`openssl@3`). Our
include paths have `... -isystem /usr/local/include -isystem
/usr/local/opt/[email protected]/include ...`. It means that
`/usr/local/include/openssl/...` is used for `#include <openssl/...>`.

If we mix OpenSSL 3 headers and OpenSSL 1.1 libraries, we may get some
problems such as a link error.

This uses OpenSSL 3 instead of OpenSSL 1.1 because GitHub Actions
self-hosted runner for macOS provides OpenSSL 3 by
/usr/local/include/openssl/. Note that `$(brew --prefix
openssl@3)/include` isn't linked as /usr/local/include/openssl` by
default. So I think that Homebrew GitHub Actions self-hosted runner
for macOS does it explicitly.

Other solution: Unlinking `/usr/local/include/openssl` by `brew unlink
openssl@3`. But there is no reason to use OpenSSL 1.1 for us. So this
PR doesn't use this solution.
laurentgo pushed a commit to laurentgo/arrow that referenced this issue Jun 28, 2023
GitHub Actions self-hosted runner for macOS has
/usr/local/include/openssl/ provided by OpenSSL 3 (`openssl@3`). Our
include paths have `... -isystem /usr/local/include -isystem
/usr/local/opt/[email protected]/include ...`. It means that
`/usr/local/include/openssl/...` is used for `#include <openssl/...>`.

If we mix OpenSSL 3 headers and OpenSSL 1.1 libraries, we may get some
problems such as a link error.

This uses OpenSSL 3 instead of OpenSSL 1.1 because GitHub Actions
self-hosted runner for macOS provides OpenSSL 3 by
/usr/local/include/openssl/. Note that `$(brew --prefix
openssl@3)/include` isn't linked as /usr/local/include/openssl` by
default. So I think that Homebrew GitHub Actions self-hosted runner
for macOS does it explicitly.

Other solution: Unlinking `/usr/local/include/openssl` by `brew unlink
openssl@3`. But there is no reason to use OpenSSL 1.1 for us. So this
PR doesn't use this solution.
laurentgo pushed a commit to laurentgo/arrow that referenced this issue Jun 28, 2023
GitHub Actions self-hosted runner for macOS has
/usr/local/include/openssl/ provided by OpenSSL 3 (`openssl@3`). Our
include paths have `... -isystem /usr/local/include -isystem
/usr/local/opt/[email protected]/include ...`. It means that
`/usr/local/include/openssl/...` is used for `#include <openssl/...>`.

If we mix OpenSSL 3 headers and OpenSSL 1.1 libraries, we may get some
problems such as a link error.

This uses OpenSSL 3 instead of OpenSSL 1.1 because GitHub Actions
self-hosted runner for macOS provides OpenSSL 3 by
/usr/local/include/openssl/. Note that `$(brew --prefix
openssl@3)/include` isn't linked as /usr/local/include/openssl` by
default. So I think that Homebrew GitHub Actions self-hosted runner
for macOS does it explicitly.

Other solution: Unlinking `/usr/local/include/openssl` by `brew unlink
openssl@3`. But there is no reason to use OpenSSL 1.1 for us. So this
PR doesn't use this solution.
kou added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 30, 2023
### Rationale for this change

GitHub Actions self-hosted runner for macOS has
/usr/local/include/openssl/ provided by OpenSSL 3 (`openssl@ 3`). Our include paths have `... -isystem /usr/local/include -isystem /usr/local/opt/openssl@ 1.1/include ...`. It means that `/usr/local/include/openssl/...` is used for `#include <openssl/...>`.

If we mix OpenSSL 3 headers and OpenSSL 1.1 libraries, we may get some problems such as a link error.

### What changes are included in this PR?

This uses OpenSSL 3 instead of OpenSSL 1.1 because GitHub Actions self-hosted runner for macOS provides OpenSSL 3 by /usr/local/include/openssl/. Note that `$(brew --prefix openssl@ 3)/include` isn't linked as /usr/local/include/openssl` by default. So I think that Homebrew GitHub Actions self-hosted runner for macOS does it explicitly.

Other solution: Unlinking `/usr/local/include/openssl` by `brew unlink openssl@ 3`. But there is no reason to use OpenSSL 1.1 for us. So this PR doesn't use this solution.

### Are these changes tested?

Yes.

### Are there any user-facing changes?

Yes.
* Closes: #36329

Authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]>
@kou kou added this to the 13.0.0 milestone Jun 30, 2023
lriggs pushed a commit to lriggs/arrow that referenced this issue Jul 19, 2023
### Rationale for this change

GitHub Actions self-hosted runner for macOS has
/usr/local/include/openssl/ provided by OpenSSL 3 (`openssl@ 3`). Our include paths have `... -isystem /usr/local/include -isystem /usr/local/opt/openssl@ 1.1/include ...`. It means that `/usr/local/include/openssl/...` is used for `#include <openssl/...>`.

If we mix OpenSSL 3 headers and OpenSSL 1.1 libraries, we may get some problems such as a link error.

### What changes are included in this PR?

This uses OpenSSL 3 instead of OpenSSL 1.1 because GitHub Actions self-hosted runner for macOS provides OpenSSL 3 by /usr/local/include/openssl/. Note that `$(brew --prefix openssl@ 3)/include` isn't linked as /usr/local/include/openssl` by default. So I think that Homebrew GitHub Actions self-hosted runner for macOS does it explicitly.

Other solution: Unlinking `/usr/local/include/openssl` by `brew unlink openssl@ 3`. But there is no reason to use OpenSSL 1.1 for us. So this PR doesn't use this solution.

### Are these changes tested?

Yes.

### Are there any user-facing changes?

Yes.
* Closes: apache#36329

Authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]>
lriggs pushed a commit to dremio/arrow that referenced this issue Jul 21, 2023
### Rationale for this change

GitHub Actions self-hosted runner for macOS has
/usr/local/include/openssl/ provided by OpenSSL 3 (`openssl@ 3`). Our include paths have `... -isystem /usr/local/include -isystem /usr/local/opt/openssl@ 1.1/include ...`. It means that `/usr/local/include/openssl/...` is used for `#include <openssl/...>`.

If we mix OpenSSL 3 headers and OpenSSL 1.1 libraries, we may get some problems such as a link error.

### What changes are included in this PR?

This uses OpenSSL 3 instead of OpenSSL 1.1 because GitHub Actions self-hosted runner for macOS provides OpenSSL 3 by /usr/local/include/openssl/. Note that `$(brew --prefix openssl@ 3)/include` isn't linked as /usr/local/include/openssl` by default. So I think that Homebrew GitHub Actions self-hosted runner for macOS does it explicitly.

Other solution: Unlinking `/usr/local/include/openssl` by `brew unlink openssl@ 3`. But there is no reason to use OpenSSL 1.1 for us. So this PR doesn't use this solution.

### Are these changes tested?

Yes.

### Are there any user-facing changes?

Yes.
* Closes: apache#36329

Authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]>
xxlaykxx added a commit to dremio/arrow that referenced this issue Jul 30, 2023
### Rationale for this change

GitHub Actions self-hosted runner for macOS has
/usr/local/include/openssl/ provided by OpenSSL 3 (`openssl@ 3`). Our include paths have `... -isystem /usr/local/include -isystem /usr/local/opt/openssl@ 1.1/include ...`. It means that `/usr/local/include/openssl/...` is used for `#include <openssl/...>`.

If we mix OpenSSL 3 headers and OpenSSL 1.1 libraries, we may get some problems such as a link error.

### What changes are included in this PR?

This uses OpenSSL 3 instead of OpenSSL 1.1 because GitHub Actions self-hosted runner for macOS provides OpenSSL 3 by /usr/local/include/openssl/. Note that `$(brew --prefix openssl@ 3)/include` isn't linked as /usr/local/include/openssl` by default. So I think that Homebrew GitHub Actions self-hosted runner for macOS does it explicitly.

Other solution: Unlinking `/usr/local/include/openssl` by `brew unlink openssl@ 3`. But there is no reason to use OpenSSL 1.1 for us. So this PR doesn't use this solution.

### Are these changes tested?

Yes.

### Are there any user-facing changes?

Yes.
* Closes: apache#36329

Authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants