Ignore deprecations in gcp automl, translate

[gopidesupavan]

https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/12441141635/job/34737776458

---

^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

[gopidesupavan]

Do we really need to ignore these deprecations? or we should remove those deprecated classes? it looks like they have date mentioned target around sept 2025.

[potiuk]

Let's take a closer look before merging

[potiuk]

It's ok - it's September 2025 - so they are fine. My question is more why in the original PR the tests did not fail. I am looking into it.

[gopidesupavan]

It's ok - it's September 2025 - so they are fine. My question is more why in the original PR the tests did not fail. I am looking into it.

ah i see it looks like providers tests not triggered in original pr https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/12431426634/job/34709142003

[gopidesupavan]

looks like selective checks ignoring some of the file checks conditions. trying to look more..

[potiuk]

Fix here #45131

[potiuk]

It was a very subtle combination of two bugs - and it's mostly a by-product of having several different folders where provider files come from. Will be simplified in the future when we implement #44511 (I am working on it already - first PRs are coming shortly on that one).