Move filesystem sensor to standard provider #43890
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
boring-cyborg
bot
added
area:CLI
area:core-operators
romsharon98
approved these changes
Nov 17, 2024
|
nice! |
12 tasks
kandharvishnu
pushed a commit
to kandharvishnu/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2024
* Moved filesystem sensor to standard provider * Update all references to filesystem sensor * Update provider.yaml with standard filesystem sensor name * Typo fix in contributing-docs * Changing title underline as per static test error msg * DAT-1897 - Update docs and references as per review comments * Moved sensor documentation to standard provider * Removed reference to file sensor from index.rst
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Move filesystem sensor to standard provider, relates to #43641.
^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.