Add back methods in security manager #37997
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
vincbeck
requested review from
ryanahamilton,
ashb,
bbovenzi and
pierrejeambrun
as code owners
This was referenced Mar 8, 2024
|
Test implemented in #37915 |
hussein-awala
approved these changes
Mar 8, 2024
howardyoo
pushed a commit
to howardyoo/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2024
howardyoo
pushed a commit
to howardyoo/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2024
utkarsharma2
pushed a commit
to astronomer/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I wrongly removed 2 methods in #37889. Adding them back. It makes fail any auth manager but FAB. I'll add a test in a separate PR to catch it. The reason why I dont add the test in this PR is:
^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.