Add operator to create jobs in Databricks #35156
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tatiana
force-pushed
the
databricks-jobs-create
branch
4 times, most recently
from
bcb5d02 to
7b04f5b
Compare
…fic version ==0.10.0
…fic version ==0.10.0
This was agreed with @stikkireddy, since there the SDK interfaces are changing ATM. When it becomes stable, we can re-introduce this dependency
tatiana
force-pushed
the
databricks-jobs-create
branch
from
f75c975 to
043f692
Compare
|
@Lee-W @potiuk @phanikumv @pankajastro @pankajkoti This PR addresses the feedback given on #32221 and fixes the tests. The Hoping we can get this merged to main soon - I have a few follow up PRs! |
27 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add
DatabricksCreateJobsOperatorfor use cases where theDatabricksSubmitRunOperatoris insufficient.Closes: #29733
This work was mostly done by @kyle-winkelman (#29790) and @stikkireddy (#32221), and this PR aims to get their work to the finishing line.
These were the changes I made since #32221:
mainbranchdatabricks-sdkdependency as a follow-up to a conversation with @stikkireddy, since the interfaces of this library are not stable yet. We can improve the operator in the future to use this after the 1.0 release.^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.