Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add note about image regeneration in June 2022 #24524

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 23, 2022

Conversation

potiuk
Copy link
Member

@potiuk potiuk commented Jun 17, 2022

Added note about reganerating images in June 2022.

The noteis about image changes after refreshing are now better
organized (around date of the change) - this should be more useful
by the users who will look why their images have been refreshed.

Related to: #24516


^ Add meaningful description above

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code change, Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragement file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added area:production-image Production image improvements and fixes kind:documentation labels Jun 17, 2022
@potiuk potiuk added this to the Airflow 2.3.3 milestone Jun 17, 2022
@potiuk potiuk force-pushed the better-notes-about-image-regenerations branch from a71b243 to 19e5169 Compare June 17, 2022 14:03
@potiuk potiuk requested a review from mik-laj as a code owner June 17, 2022 14:03
@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented Jun 17, 2022

Looks green

@potiuk potiuk mentioned this pull request Jun 17, 2022
1 task
@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented Jun 19, 2022

Would be nice to get it green to get better image changelog @jedcunningham @ephraimbuddy

@potiuk potiuk requested a review from josh-fell June 22, 2022 07:55
@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented Jun 22, 2022

Anyone?

docs/docker-stack/changelog.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/docker-stack/changelog.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/docker-stack/changelog.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@potiuk potiuk force-pushed the better-notes-about-image-regenerations branch from 5933a5f to 191e3ce Compare June 22, 2022 22:40
Added note about reganerating images in June 2022.

The noteis about image changes after refreshing are now better
organized (around date of the change) - this should be more useful
by the users who will look why their images have been refreshed.

Related to: apache#24516
@potiuk potiuk force-pushed the better-notes-about-image-regenerations branch from 191e3ce to 1f87e2e Compare June 22, 2022 22:40
docs/docker-stack/changelog.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/docker-stack/changelog.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@github-actions github-actions bot added the okay to merge It's ok to merge this PR as it does not require more tests label Jun 22, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers might decide that full test matrix is needed and add the 'full tests needed' label. Then you should rebase it to the latest main or amend the last commit of the PR, and push it with --force-with-lease.

Copy link
Member

@jedcunningham jedcunningham left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks @potiuk!

docs/docker-stack/changelog.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@potiuk potiuk merged commit 1a62829 into apache:main Jun 23, 2022
@potiuk potiuk deleted the better-notes-about-image-regenerations branch June 23, 2022 00:27
ephraimbuddy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 29, 2022
The note is about image changes after refreshing are now better
organized (around date of the change) - this should be more useful
by the users who will look why their images have been refreshed.

Related to: #24516

(cherry picked from commit 1a62829)
@ephraimbuddy ephraimbuddy added the type:doc-only Changelog: Doc Only label Jun 30, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:production-image Production image improvements and fixes kind:documentation okay to merge It's ok to merge this PR as it does not require more tests type:doc-only Changelog: Doc Only
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants