Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update doc for DAG file processing #23209

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2022

Conversation

ephraimbuddy
Copy link
Contributor

We can now run the DagFileProcessorProcess in a separate process and it's not fully documented

@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added area:Scheduler including HA (high availability) scheduler kind:documentation labels Apr 25, 2022
We can now run the ``DagFileProcessorProcess`` in a separate process and it's not fully documented

Update docs/apache-airflow/concepts/dagfile-processing.rst

Co-authored-by: Tzu-ping Chung <[email protected]>

fixup! Update docs/apache-airflow/concepts/dagfile-processing.rst
@ephraimbuddy ephraimbuddy force-pushed the dagfile-processing-doc branch from 6e1dfcc to 114da69 Compare April 25, 2022 09:54
@github-actions github-actions bot added the okay to merge It's ok to merge this PR as it does not require more tests label Apr 25, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers might decide that full test matrix is needed and add the 'full tests needed' label. Then you should rebase it to the latest main or amend the last commit of the PR, and push it with --force-with-lease.

@ephraimbuddy ephraimbuddy added the type:doc-only Changelog: Doc Only label Apr 25, 2022
@ephraimbuddy ephraimbuddy merged commit 61bc8ff into apache:main Apr 25, 2022
@ephraimbuddy ephraimbuddy deleted the dagfile-processing-doc branch April 25, 2022 12:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area:Scheduler including HA (high availability) scheduler kind:documentation okay to merge It's ok to merge this PR as it does not require more tests type:doc-only Changelog: Doc Only
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants