Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve test and typing coverage for Qubole Operator #10928

Closed
chattarajoy opened this issue Sep 14, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

Improve test and typing coverage for Qubole Operator #10928

chattarajoy opened this issue Sep 14, 2020 · 5 comments
Labels
good first issue kind:task A task that needs to be completed as part of a larger issue

Comments

@chattarajoy
Copy link
Contributor

This provider also has poor typing coverage.
#9708 (comment)

Originally posted by @mik-laj in #9347 (comment)

@boring-cyborg
Copy link

boring-cyborg bot commented Sep 14, 2020

Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue template!

@chattarajoy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Pls assign this to me

@mik-laj mik-laj added the kind:feature Feature Requests label Sep 14, 2020
@chattarajoy chattarajoy removed their assignment Sep 25, 2020
@chattarajoy
Copy link
Contributor Author

chattarajoy commented Sep 25, 2020

assigned to @lordozb

@eladkal eladkal added good first issue and removed kind:feature Feature Requests labels Dec 25, 2020
@vikramkoka vikramkoka added the kind:task A task that needs to be completed as part of a larger issue label Feb 9, 2021
@morrme
Copy link
Contributor

morrme commented Feb 17, 2021

Hello @eladkal and @vikramkoka !

It seems as though this operator now has ~94% coverage according to #9708 (comment)

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor

eladkal commented Feb 17, 2021

fixed in #11229

@eladkal eladkal closed this as completed Feb 17, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue kind:task A task that needs to be completed as part of a larger issue
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants