v2.0: Fix reserve minimal compute units for builtins (backport of #3799)

[mergify]

Problem

Implementing solana-foundation/solana-improvement-documents#170 by defining MAX_BUILTIN_ALLOCATION_COMPUTE_UNIT_LIMIT to 3K CUs, then use it to allocate builtin instructions' CU Meters for VM and cost tracking for leaders.

Summary of Changes

• When calculates default tx cu limits, use MAX_BUILTIN_ALLOCATION_COMPUTE_UNIT_LIMIT per builtin instruction, including compute-budget program instructions.
• Cost model reads cu limits from RuntimeTransaction's static_meta, replacing a localized implementation that isn't consistent with compute-budget.
• Changes are behind Feature gate
• updated existing tests to allow additional feature_set parameters (touch many files)

Feature Gate Issue: #2562

---

This is an automatic backport of pull request #3799 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

[mergify]

Cherry-pick of 3e9af14 has failed:

On branch mergify/bp/v2.0/pr-3799
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/v2.0'.

You are currently cherry-picking commit 3e9af14f3a.
  (fix conflicts and run "git cherry-pick --continue")
  (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
  (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)

Changes to be committed:
	new file:   runtime-transaction/src/builtin_programs_filter.rs
	modified:   sdk/program/src/message/sanitized.rs
	modified:   sdk/program/src/message/versions/sanitized.rs

Unmerged paths:
  (use "git add/rm <file>..." as appropriate to mark resolution)
	deleted by us:   builtins-default-costs/src/lib.rs
	deleted by us:   compute-budget/src/compute_budget_limits.rs
	both modified:   compute-budget/src/compute_budget_processor.rs
	both modified:   core/src/banking_stage/consumer.rs
	both modified:   core/src/banking_stage/immutable_deserialized_packet.rs
	deleted by us:   core/src/banking_stage/transaction_scheduler/receive_and_buffer.rs
	both modified:   cost-model/src/cost_model.rs
	both modified:   cost-model/src/transaction_cost.rs
	deleted by us:   programs/compute-budget-bench/benches/compute_budget.rs
	both modified:   programs/sbf/tests/programs.rs
	deleted by us:   runtime-transaction/benches/process_compute_budget_instructions.rs
	deleted by us:   runtime-transaction/src/compute_budget_instruction_details.rs
	deleted by us:   runtime-transaction/src/compute_budget_program_id_filter.rs
	both modified:   runtime-transaction/src/lib.rs
	both modified:   runtime-transaction/src/runtime_transaction.rs
	deleted by us:   runtime-transaction/src/runtime_transaction/sdk_transactions.rs
	both modified:   runtime/src/bank.rs
	both modified:   runtime/src/bank/tests.rs
	both modified:   runtime/src/prioritization_fee_cache.rs
	both modified:   sdk/src/feature_set.rs
	deleted by us:   svm-transaction/src/svm_message.rs
	deleted by us:   svm-transaction/src/svm_message/sanitized_message.rs
	deleted by us:   svm-transaction/src/svm_message/sanitized_transaction.rs
	both modified:   svm/src/transaction_processor.rs
	deleted by us:   transaction-view/src/resolved_transaction_view.rs
	deleted by us:   transaction-view/src/transaction_view.rs

To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally

[t-nelson]

this has been untouched with conflicts for two weeks. can we close it?

[tao-stones]

this has been untouched with conflicts for two weeks. can we close it?

I also think better not to backport this one, but let me sync up w @jstarry tomorrow when he's back.