-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 369
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update documents to replace AntreaProxy with Antrea Proxy #6515
Update documents to replace AntreaProxy with Antrea Proxy #6515
Conversation
6c0ecc3
to
e8c40a6
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A nit.
e8c40a6
to
b211195
Compare
type, `noEncap`, `noSNAT` traffic mode, and `AntreaProxy` feature enabled. Configuration | ||
with `ProxyAll` feature enabled is not verified. | ||
type, `noEncap`, `noSNAT` traffic mode, and Antrea Proxy enabled. Configuration | ||
with `proxyAll` enabled is not verified. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Worthy to check all ProxyAll
and update ProxyAll
to proxyAll
if necessary.
I can see there are inconsistent in some docs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will check.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I found that every ProxyAll (Without quotting)
is at the beginning of sentences. I don't think we need to update them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only when it refers to the proxyAll
field in the YAML, we should we use proxyAll
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only when it refers to the proxyAll field in the YAML, we should we use proxyAll.
I may not get what you mean. Do you mean that we should use proxyAll
in the YAML comments, even if the word is at the beginning of sentences?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
'proxyAllhere should refer to the
proxyAllfield in
antrea-agent.confright? In this case, we should use
proxyAllas Lan suggested, not
ProxyAll, as the field is named
proxyAll`. It does not matter whether it begins a sentence or not.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, got that. If so, how about this: Option proxyAll
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the current version here "Configuration
with proxyAll
enabled is not verified" is fine.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, got that. If so, how about this: Option proxyAll?
I meant that how about changing the ProxyAll tells antrea-agent .....
at the beginning of sentences in YAML files to Option proxyAll tells antrea-agent
.
I think the current version here "Configuration
with proxyAll enabled is not verified" is fine.
I didn't change this one where proxyAll
is not at the beginning of sentences. @jianjuns
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK. I think we can say "proxyAll tells..."
b211195
to
5cabe64
Compare
5cabe64
to
e5c4fc6
Compare
e5c4fc6
to
51ed9da
Compare
Signed-off-by: Hongliang Liu <[email protected]>
51ed9da
to
b1bc4a8
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@jianjuns Could you help do the final confirm to see if we can merge this? Thanks |
I do not have further comments, but should we wait for your other Antrea Proxy fix PR merged first, and so we can update new added "AntreaProxy" in that PR too? |
@jianjuns IIRC, I don't have other Antrea Proxy PRs right now. If you meant it is #6308, I have rebased this PR. |
/skip-all |
…6515) Signed-off-by: Hongliang Liu <[email protected]>
No description provided.