Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.28.0 #233

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.28.0 #233

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jun 6, 2023 •
edited
Loading

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
react-router (source) ~6.11.0 -> ~6.28.0 age adoption passing confidence
react-router-dom (source) ~6.11.0 -> ~6.28.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

remix-run/react-router (react-router)

v6.28.0

Compare Source

v6.27.0: v6.27.0

Compare Source

See the changelog for release notes: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#v6270

v6.26.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.26.1

Compare Source

v6.26.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add a new replace(url, init?) alternative to redirect(url, init?) that performs a history.replaceState instead of a history.pushState on client-side navigation redirects (#​11811)
Patch Changes
  • Fix initial hydration behavior when using future.v7_partialHydration along with unstable_patchRoutesOnMiss (#​11838)
    • During initial hydration, router.state.matches will now include any partial matches so that we can render ancestor HydrateFallback components
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.25.1: v6.25.1

Compare Source

See the changelog for release notes: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#v6251

v6.25.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Stabilize future.unstable_skipActionErrorRevalidation as future.v7_skipActionErrorRevalidation (#​11769)

    • When this flag is enabled, actions will not automatically trigger a revalidation if they return/throw a Response with a 4xx/5xx status code
    • You may still opt-into revalidation via shouldRevalidate
    • This also changes shouldRevalidate's unstable_actionStatus parameter to actionStatus
Patch Changes
  • Fix regression and properly decode paths inside useMatch so matches/params reflect decoded params (#​11789)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.24.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • When using future.v7_relativeSplatPath, properly resolve relative paths in splat routes that are children of pathless routes (#​11633)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.24.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
Patch Changes

v6.23.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.23.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add a new unstable_dataStrategy configuration option (#​11098)
    • This option allows Data Router applications to take control over the approach for executing route loaders and actions
    • The default implementation is today's behavior, to fetch all loaders in parallel, but this option allows users to implement more advanced data flows including Remix single-fetch, middleware/context APIs, automatic loader caching, and more
Patch Changes

v6.22.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.22.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.22.1: v6.22.1

Compare Source

See the changelog for release notes: https://github.com/remix-run/react-router/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#v6221

v6.22.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.21.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Remove leftover unstable_ prefix from Blocker/BlockerFunction types (#​11187)

v6.21.2

Compare Source

v6.21.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Fix bug with route.lazy not working correctly on initial SPA load when v7_partialHydration is specified (#​11121)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.21.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Add a new future.v7_relativeSplatPath flag to implement a breaking bug fix to relative routing when inside a splat route. (#​11087)

    This fix was originally added in #​10983 and was later reverted in #​11078 because it was determined that a large number of existing applications were relying on the buggy behavior (see #​11052)

    The Bug
    The buggy behavior is that without this flag, the default behavior when resolving relative paths is to ignore any splat (*) portion of the current route path.

    The Background
    This decision was originally made thinking that it would make the concept of nested different sections of your apps in <Routes> easier if relative routing would replace the current splat:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>
    <Route path="/" element={<Home />} />
    <Route path="dashboard/*" element={<Dashboard />} />
  </Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

    Any paths like /dashboard, /dashboard/team, /dashboard/projects will match the Dashboard route. The dashboard component itself can then render nested <Routes>:

    function Dashboard() {
  return (
    <div>
      <h2>Dashboard</h2>
      <nav>
        <Link to="/">Dashboard Home</Link>
        <Link to="team">Team</Link>
        <Link to="projects">Projects</Link>
      </nav>

      <Routes>
        <Route path="/" element={<DashboardHome />} />
        <Route path="team" element={<DashboardTeam />} />
        <Route path="projects" element={<DashboardProjects />} />
      </Routes>
    </div>
  );
}

    Now, all links and route paths are relative to the router above them. This makes code splitting and compartmentalizing your app really easy. You could render the Dashboard as its own independent app, or embed it into your large app without making any changes to it.

    The Problem

    The problem is that this concept of ignoring part of a path breaks a lot of other assumptions in React Router - namely that "." always means the current location pathname for that route. When we ignore the splat portion, we start getting invalid paths when using ".":

    // If we are on URL /dashboard/team, and we want to link to /dashboard/team:
function DashboardTeam() {
  // ❌ This is broken and results in <a href="/dashboard">
  return <Link to=".">A broken link to the Current URL</Link>;

  // ✅ This is fixed but super unintuitive since we're already at /dashboard/team!
  return <Link to="./team">A broken link to the Current URL</Link>;
}

    We've also introduced an issue that we can no longer move our DashboardTeam component around our route hierarchy easily - since it behaves differently if we're underneath a non-splat route, such as /dashboard/:widget. Now, our "." links will, properly point to ourself inclusive of the dynamic param value so behavior will break from it's corresponding usage in a /dashboard/* route.

    Even worse, consider a nested splat route configuration:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>
    <Route path="dashboard">
      <Route path="*" element={<Dashboard />} />
    </Route>
  </Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

    Now, a <Link to="."> and a <Link to=".."> inside the Dashboard component go to the same place! That is definitely not correct!

    Another common issue arose in Data Routers (and Remix) where any <Form> should post to it's own route action if you the user doesn't specify a form action:

    let router = createBrowserRouter({
  path: "/dashboard",
  children: [
    {
      path: "*",
      action: dashboardAction,
      Component() {
        // ❌ This form is broken!  It throws a 405 error when it submits because
        // it tries to submit to /dashboard (without the splat value) and the parent
        // `/dashboard` route doesn't have an action
        return <Form method="post">...</Form>;
      },
    },
  ],
});

    This is just a compounded issue from the above because the default location for a Form to submit to is itself (".") - and if we ignore the splat portion, that now resolves to the parent route.

    The Solution
    If you are leveraging this behavior, it's recommended to enable the future flag, move your splat to it's own route, and leverage ../ for any links to "sibling" pages:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>
    <Route path="dashboard">
      <Route index path="*" element={<Dashboard />} />
    </Route>
  </Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

function Dashboard() {
  return (
    <div>
      <h2>Dashboard</h2>
      <nav>
        <Link to="..">Dashboard Home</Link>
        <Link to="../team">Team</Link>
        <Link to="../projects">Projects</Link>
      </nav>

      <Routes>
        <Route path="/" element={<DashboardHome />} />
        <Route path="team" element={<DashboardTeam />} />
        <Route path="projects" element={<DashboardProjects />} />
      </Router>
    </div>
  );
}

    This way, . means "the full current pathname for my route" in all cases (including static, dynamic, and splat routes) and .. always means "my parents pathname".

Patch Changes

v6.20.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.20.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Export the PathParam type from the public API (#​10719)
Patch Changes
  • Fix bug with resolveTo in splat routes (#​11045)
    • This is a follow up to #​10983 to handle the few other code paths using getPathContributingMatches
    • This removes the UNSAFE_getPathContributingMatches export from @remix-run/router since we no longer need this in the react-router/react-router-dom layers
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.19.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add unstable_flushSync option to useNavigate/useSumbit/fetcher.load/fetcher.submit to opt-out of React.startTransition and into ReactDOM.flushSync for state updates (#​11005)
  • Remove the unstable_ prefix from the useBlocker hook as it's been in use for enough time that we are confident in the API. We do not plan to remove the prefix from unstable_usePrompt due to differences in how browsers handle window.confirm that prevent React Router from guaranteeing consistent/correct behavior. (#​10991)
Patch Changes

  • Fix useActionData so it returns proper contextual action data and not any action data in the tree (#​11023)

  • Fix bug in useResolvedPath that would cause useResolvedPath(".") in a splat route to lose the splat portion of the URL path. (#​10983)

    • ⚠️ This fixes a quite long-standing bug specifically for "." paths inside a splat route which incorrectly dropped the splat portion of the URL. If you are relative routing via "." inside a splat route in your application you should double check that your logic is not relying on this buggy behavior and update accordingly.

  • Updated dependencies:

v6.18.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Fix the future prop on BrowserRouter, HashRouter and MemoryRouter so that it accepts a Partial<FutureConfig> instead of requiring all flags to be included. (#​10962)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.17.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Fix RouterProvider future prop type to be a Partial<FutureConfig> so that not all flags must be specified (#​10900)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.16.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • In order to move towards stricter TypeScript support in the future, we're aiming to replace current usages of any with unknown on exposed typings for user-provided data. To do this in Remix v2 without introducing breaking changes in React Router v6, we have added generics to a number of shared types. These continue to default to any in React Router and are overridden with unknown in Remix. In React Router v7 we plan to move these to unknown as a breaking change. (#​10843)
    • Location now accepts a generic for the location.state value
    • ActionFunctionArgs/ActionFunction/LoaderFunctionArgs/LoaderFunction now accept a generic for the context parameter (only used in SSR usages via createStaticHandler)
    • The return type of useMatches (now exported as UIMatch) accepts generics for match.data and match.handle - both of which were already set to unknown
  • Move the @private class export ErrorResponse to an UNSAFE_ErrorResponseImpl export since it is an implementation detail and there should be no construction of ErrorResponse instances in userland. This frees us up to export a type ErrorResponse which correlates to an instance of the class via InstanceType. Userland code should only ever be using ErrorResponse as a type and should be type-narrowing via isRouteErrorResponse. (#​10811)
  • Export ShouldRevalidateFunctionArgs interface (#​10797)
  • Removed private/internal APIs only required for the Remix v1 backwards compatibility layer and no longer needed in Remix v2 (_isFetchActionRedirect, _hasFetcherDoneAnything) (#​10715)
Patch Changes

v6.15.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add's a new redirectDocument() function which allows users to specify that a redirect from a loader/action should trigger a document reload (via window.location) instead of attempting to navigate to the redirected location via React Router (#​10705)
Patch Changes
  • Ensure useRevalidator is referentially stable across re-renders if revalidations are not actively occurring (#​10707)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.14.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.14.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Fix loop in unstable_useBlocker when used with an unstable blocker function (#​10652)
  • Fix issues with reused blockers on subsequent navigations (#​10656)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.14.0

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Strip basename from locations provided to unstable_useBlocker functions to match useLocation (#​10573)
  • Fix generatePath when passed a numeric 0 value parameter (#​10612)
  • Fix unstable_useBlocker key issues in StrictMode (#​10573)
  • Fix tsc --skipLibCheck:false issues on React 17 (#​10622)
  • Upgrade typescript to 5.1 (#​10581)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.13.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Move React.startTransition usage behind a future flag to avoid issues with existing incompatible Suspense usages. We recommend folks adopting this flag to be better compatible with React concurrent mode, but if you run into issues you can continue without the use of startTransition until v7. Issues usually boils down to creating net-new promises during the render cycle, so if you run into issues you should either lift your promise creation out of the render cycle or put it behind a useMemo. (#​10596)

    Existing behavior will no longer include React.startTransition:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>{/*...*/}</Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

<RouterProvider router={router} />

    If you wish to enable React.startTransition, pass the future flag to your component:

    <BrowserRouter future={{ v7_startTransition: true }}>
  <Routes>{/*...*/}</Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

<RouterProvider router={router} future={{ v7_startTransition: true }}/>
Patch Changes
  • Work around webpack/terser React.startTransition minification bug in production mode (#​10588)

v6.12.1

Compare Source

Warning
Please use version 6.13.0 or later instead of 6.12.1. This version suffers from a webpack/terser minification issue resulting in invalid minified code in your resulting production bundles which can cause issues in your application. See #​10579 for more details.

Patch Changes
  • Adjust feature detection of React.startTransition to fix webpack + react 17 compilation error (#​10569)

v6.12.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Wrap internal router state updates with React.startTransition if it exists (#​10438)
Patch Changes
remix-run/react-router (react-router-dom)

v6.28.0

Compare Source

v6.27.0

Compare Source

v6.26.2

Compare Source

v6.26.1

Compare Source

v6.26.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add a new replace(url, init?) alternative to redirect(url, init?) that performs a history.replaceState instead of a history.pushState on client-side navigation redirects (#​11811)
Patch Changes
  • Fix initial hydration behavior when using future.v7_partialHydration along with unstable_patchRoutesOnMiss (#​11838)
    • During initial hydration, router.state.matches will now include any partial matches so that we can render ancestor HydrateFallback components
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.25.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.25.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Stabilize future.unstable_skipActionErrorRevalidation as future.v7_skipActionErrorRevalidation (#​11769)

    • When this flag is enabled, actions will not automatically trigger a revalidation if they return/throw a Response with a 4xx/5xx status code
    • You may still opt-into revalidation via shouldRevalidate
    • This also changes shouldRevalidate's unstable_actionStatus parameter to actionStatus
Patch Changes

v6.24.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.24.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
Patch Changes
  • Fix fetcher.submit types - remove incorrect navigate/fetcherKey/unstable_viewTransition options because they are only relevant for useSubmit (#​11631)
  • Allow falsy location.state values passed to <StaticRouter> (#​11495)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.23.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.23.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add a new unstable_dataStrategy configuration option (#​11098)
    • This option allows Data Router applications to take control over the approach for executing route loaders and actions
    • The default implementation is today's behavior, to fetch all loaders in parallel, but this option allows users to implement more advanced data flows including Remix single-fetch, middleware/context APIs, automatic loader caching, and more
Patch Changes

v6.22.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.22.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.22.1

Compare Source

v6.22.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Include a window__reactRouterVersion tag for CWV Report detection (#​11222)
Patch Changes

v6.21.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Fix NavLink isPending when a basename is used (#​11195)
  • Remove leftover unstable_ prefix from Blocker/BlockerFunction types (#​11187)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.21.2

Compare Source

v6.21.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.21.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Add a new future.v7_relativeSplatPath flag to implement a breaking bug fix to relative routing when inside a splat route. (#​11087)

    This fix was originally added in #​10983 and was later reverted in #​11078 because it was determined that a large number of existing applications were relying on the buggy behavior (see #​11052)

    The Bug
    The buggy behavior is that without this flag, the default behavior when resolving relative paths is to ignore any splat (*) portion of the current route path.

    The Background
    This decision was originally made thinking that it would make the concept of nested different sections of your apps in <Routes> easier if relative routing would replace the current splat:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>
    <Route path="/" element={<Home />} />
    <Route path="dashboard/*" element={<Dashboard />} />
  </Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

    Any paths like /dashboard, /dashboard/team, /dashboard/projects will match the Dashboard route. The dashboard component itself can then render nested <Routes>:

    function Dashboard() {
  return (
    <div>
      <h2>Dashboard</h2>
      <nav>
        <Link to="/">Dashboard Home</Link>
        <Link to="team">Team</Link>
        <Link to="projects">Projects</Link>
      </nav>

      <Routes>
        <Route path="/" element={<DashboardHome />} />
        <Route path="team" element={<DashboardTeam />} />
        <Route path="projects" element={<DashboardProjects />} />
      </Routes>
    </div>
  );
}

    Now, all links and route paths are relative to the router above them. This makes code splitting and compartmentalizing your app really easy. You could render the Dashboard as its own independent app, or embed it into your large app without making any changes to it.

    The Problem

    The problem is that this concept of ignoring part of a path breaks a lot of other assumptions in React Router - namely that "." always means the current location pathname for that route. When we ignore the splat portion, we start getting invalid paths when using ".":

    // If we are on URL /dashboard/team, and we want to link to /dashboard/team:
function DashboardTeam() {
  // ❌ This is broken and results in <a href="/dashboard">
  return <Link to=".">A broken link to the Current URL</Link>;

  // ✅ This is fixed but super unintuitive since we're already at /dashboard/team!
  return <Link to="./team">A broken link to the Current URL</Link>;
}

    We've also introduced an issue that we can no longer move our DashboardTeam component around our route hierarchy easily - since it behaves differently if we're underneath a non-splat route, such as /dashboard/:widget. Now, our "." links will, properly point to ourself inclusive of the dynamic param value so behavior will break from it's corresponding usage in a /dashboard/* route.

    Even worse, consider a nested splat route configuration:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>
    <Route path="dashboard">
      <Route path="*" element={<Dashboard />} />
    </Route>
  </Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

    Now, a <Link to="."> and a <Link to=".."> inside the Dashboard component go to the same place! That is definitely not correct!

    Another common issue arose in Data Routers (and Remix) where any <Form> should post to it's own route action if you the user doesn't specify a form action:

    let router = createBrowserRouter({
  path: "/dashboard",
  children: [
    {
      path: "*",
      action: dashboardAction,
      Component() {
        // ❌ This form is broken!  It throws a 405 error when it submits because
        // it tries to submit to /dashboard (without the splat value) and the parent
        // `/dashboard` route doesn't have an action
        return <Form method="post">...</Form>;
      },
    },
  ],
});

    This is just a compounded issue from the above because the default location for a Form to submit to is itself (".") - and if we ignore the splat portion, that now resolves to the parent route.

    The Solution
    If you are leveraging this behavior, it's recommended to enable the future flag, move your splat to it's own route, and leverage ../ for any links to "sibling" pages:

    <BrowserRouter>
  <Routes>
    <Route path="dashboard">
      <Route index path="*" element={<Dashboard />} />
    </Route>
  </Routes>
</BrowserRouter>

function Dashboard() {
  return (
    <div>
      <h2>Dashboard</h2>
      <nav>
        <Link to="..">Dashboard Home</Link>
        <Link to="../team">Team</Link>
        <Link to="../projects">Projects</Link>
      </nav>

      <Routes>
        <Route path="/" element={<DashboardHome />} />
        <Route path="team" element={<DashboardTeam />} />
        <Route path="projects" element={<DashboardProjects />} />
      </Router>
    </div>
  );
}

    This way, . means "the full current pathname for my route" in all cases (including static, dynamic, and splat routes) and .. always means "my parents pathname".

Patch Changes

v6.20.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.20.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Export the PathParam type from the public API (#​10719)
Patch Changes

v6.19.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add unstable_flushSync option to useNavigate/useSumbit/fetcher.load/fetcher.submit to opt-out of React.startTransition and into ReactDOM.flushSync for state updates (#​11005)
  • Allow unstable_usePrompt to accept a BlockerFunction in addition to a boolean (#​10991)
Patch Changes
  • Fix issue where a changing fetcher key in a useFetcher that remains mounted wasn't getting picked up (#​11009)
  • Fix useFormAction which was incorrectly inheriting the ?index query param from child route action submissions (#​11025)
  • Fix NavLink active logic when to location has a trailing slash (#​10734)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.18.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Add support for manual fetcher key specification via useFetcher({ key: string }) so you can access the same fetcher instance from different components in your application without prop-drilling (RFC) (#​10960)

    • Fetcher keys are now also exposed on the fetchers returned from useFetchers so that they can be looked up by key

  • Add navigate/fetcherKey params/props to useSumbit/Form to support kicking off a fetcher submission under the hood with an optionally user-specified key (#​10960)

    • Invoking a fetcher in this way is ephemeral and stateless
    • If you need to access the state of one of these fetchers, you will need to leverage useFetcher({ key }) to look it up elsewhere
Patch Changes
  • Adds a fetcher context to RouterProvider that holds completed fetcher data, in preparation for the upcoming future flag that will change the fetcher persistence/cleanup behavior (#​10961)
  • Fix the future prop on BrowserRouter, HashRouter and MemoryRouter so that it accepts a Partial<FutureConfig> instead of requiring all flags to be included. (#​10962)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.17.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Add experimental support for the View Transitions API via document.startViewTransition to enable CSS animated transitions on SPA navigations in your application. (#​10916)

    The simplest approach to enabling a View Transition in your React Router app is via the new <Link unstable_viewTransition> prop. This will cause the navigation DOM update to be wrapped in document.startViewTransition which will enable transitions for the DOM update. Without any additional CSS styles, you'll get a basic cross-fade animation for your page.

    If you need to apply more fine-grained styles for your animations, you can leverage the unstable_useViewTransitionState hook which will tell you when a transition is in progress and you can use that to apply classes or styles:

    function ImageLink(to, src, alt) {
  let isTransitioning = unstable_useViewTransitionState(to);
  return (
    <Link to={to} unstable_viewTransition>
      <img
        src={src}
        alt={alt}
        style={{
          viewTransitionName: isTransitioning ? "image-expand" : "",
        }}
      />
    </Link>
  );
}

    You can also use the <NavLink unstable_viewTransition> shorthand which will manage the hook usage for you and automatically add a transitioning class to the <a> during the transition:

    a.transitioning img {
  view-transition-name: "image-expand";
}
    <NavLink to={to} unstable_viewTransition>
  <img src={src} alt={alt} />
</NavLink>

    For an example usage of View Transitions with React Router, check out our fork of the Astro Records demo.

    For more information on using the View Transitions API, please refer to the Smooth and simple transitions with the View Transitions API guide from the Google Chrome team.

    Please note, that because the ViewTransition API is a DOM API, we now export a specific RouterProvider from react-router-dom with this functionality. If you are importing RouterProvider from react-router, then it will not support view transitions. (#​10928

Patch Changes

v6.16.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
Patch Changes
  • Properly encode rendered URIs in server rendering to avoid hydration errors (#​10769)

v6.15.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Add's a new redirectDocument() function which allows users to specify that a redirect from a loader/action should trigger a document reload (via window.location) instead of attempting to navigate to the redirected location via React Router (#​10705)
Patch Changes
  • Fixes an edge-case affecting web extensions in Firefox that use URLSearchParams and the useSearchParams hook. (#​10620)
  • Do not include hash in useFormAction() for unspecified actions since it cannot be determined on the server and causes hydration issues (#​10758)
  • Reorder effects in unstable_usePrompt to avoid throwing an exception if the prompt is unblocked and a navigation is performed synchronously (#​10687, #​10718)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.14.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • Properly decode element id when emulating hash scrolling via <ScrollRestoration> (#​10682)
  • Add missing <Form state> prop to populate history.state on submission navigations (#​10630)
  • Support proper hydration of Error subclasses such as ReferenceError/TypeError (#​10633)
  • Updated dependencies:

v6.14.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v6.14.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

  • Add support for application/json and text/plain encodings for useSubmit/fetcher.submit. To reflect these additional types, useNavigation/useFetcher now also contain navigation.json/navigation.text and fetcher.json/fetcher.text which include the json/text submission if applicable (#​10413)

    // The default behavior will still serialize as FormData
function Component() {
  let navigation = useNavigation();
  let submit = useSubmit();
  submit({ key: "value" }, { method: "post" });
  // navigation.formEncType => "application/x-www-form-urlencoded"
  // navigation.formData    => FormData instance
}

async function action({ request }) {
  // request.headers.get("Content-Type") => "application/x-www-form-urlencoded"
  // await request.formData()            => FormData instance
}
    // Opt-into JSON encoding with `encType: "application/json"`
function Component() {
  let navigation = useNavigation();
  let submit = useSubmit();
  submit({ key: "value" }, { method: "post", encType: "application/json" });
  // navigation.formEncType => "application/json"
  // navigation.json        => { key: "value" }
}

async function action({ request }) {
  // request.headers.get("Content-Type") => "application/json"
  // await request.json()                => { key: "value" }
}
    // Opt-into text encoding with `encType: "text/plain"`
function Component() {
  let navigation = useNavigation();
  let submit = useSubmit();
  submit("Text submission", { method: "post", encType: "text/plain" });
  // navigation.formEncType => "text/plain"
  // navigation.text        => "Text submission"
}

async function action({ request }) {
  // request.headers.get("Content-Type") => "text/plain"
  // await request.text()                => "Text submission"
}
Patch Changes
  • When submitting a form from a submitter element, prefer the built-in new FormData(form, submitter) instead of the previous manual approach in modern browsers (those that support the new submitter parameter) (#​9865, #​10627)
    • For browsers that don't support it, we continue to just append the submit button's entry to the end, and we also add rudimentary support for type="image" buttons
    • If developers want full spec-compliant support for legacy browsers, they can use the formdata-submitter-polyfill
  • Call window.history.pushState/replaceState before updating React Router state (instead of after) so that window.location matches `useLo

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.12.0 chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.13.0 Jun 14, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from abb84e7 to 041e01c Compare June 14, 2023 17:52
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.13.0 chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.14.0 Jun 23, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 041e01c to 478d876 Compare June 23, 2023 21:51
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 478d876 to 9a445d0 Compare August 10, 2023 17:30
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.14.0 chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.15.0 Aug 10, 2023
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.15.0 chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.16.0 Sep 13, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 9a445d0 to a086a78 Compare September 13, 2023 18:47
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.16.0 chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.17.0 Oct 16, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from a086a78 to fe548ad Compare October 16, 2023 16:14
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.17.0 chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.18.0 Oct 31, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from fe548ad to 142e199 Compare October 31, 2023 16:57
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 142e199 to 2dc5f36 Compare November 16, 2023 15:12
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.18.0 chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.19.0 Nov 16, 2023
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.19.0 chore(deps): update react-router monorepo Nov 22, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 2dc5f36 to 0b3a4e9 Compare November 22, 2023 17:03
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update react-router monorepo chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.20.0 Nov 22, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 0b3a4e9 to 98194b8 Compare November 22, 2023 19:26
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 98194b8 to 9b46339 Compare December 13, 2023 22:45
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.20.0 chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.21.0 Dec 13, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 9b46339 to 9f885dc Compare February 1, 2024 23:15
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.21.0 chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.22.0 Feb 1, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 9f885dc to 9f14936 Compare April 23, 2024 16:04
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.22.0 chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.23.0 Apr 23, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 9f14936 to bd0b7e6 Compare June 24, 2024 22:51
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.23.0 chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.24.0 Jun 24, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from bd0b7e6 to 6d06b43 Compare August 1, 2024 11:31
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.24.0 chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.25.0 Aug 1, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 6d06b43 to d4ec539 Compare August 1, 2024 15:36
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.25.0 chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.26.0 Aug 1, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from d4ec539 to 5570e47 Compare October 11, 2024 22:04
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.26.0 chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.27.0 Oct 11, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 5570e47 to 8ece3f4 Compare November 7, 2024 01:36
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.27.0 chore(deps): update react-router monorepo to ~6.28.0 Nov 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
0 participants