Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add getreqnames test #964

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

thom-at-redhat
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Mar 6, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
1 Accepted issue

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

pkg/certificates/ca_test.go Dismissed Show dismissed Hide dismissed
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 39.61%. Comparing base (15c45db) to head (0d48630).

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel     #964      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   39.50%   39.61%   +0.10%     
==========================================
  Files          42       42              
  Lines        6606     6606              
==========================================
+ Hits         2610     2617       +7     
+ Misses       3797     3787      -10     
- Partials      199      202       +3     

see 4 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Contributor

@AaronH88 AaronH88 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@AaronH88 AaronH88 merged commit 5e147c7 into ansible:devel Mar 11, 2024
19 checks passed
@thom-at-redhat thom-at-redhat deleted the add_getreqnames_test branch March 18, 2024 16:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants