Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add codecov flag for go coverage #1014

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 24, 2024

Conversation

thom-at-redhat
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@thom-at-redhat thom-at-redhat marked this pull request as ready for review April 23, 2024 11:00
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 40.28%. Comparing base (df3d903) to head (fdd6276).
Report is 95 commits behind head on devel.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #1014      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   40.34%   40.28%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          42       42              
  Lines        6637     6637              
==========================================
- Hits         2678     2674       -4     
- Misses       3746     3750       +4     
  Partials      213      213              
Flag Coverage Δ
go 40.28% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Apr 24, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@thom-at-redhat thom-at-redhat merged commit c2bd835 into ansible:devel Apr 24, 2024
16 checks passed
@thom-at-redhat thom-at-redhat deleted the add_coverage_flags branch April 24, 2024 12:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants