Fix CI workflow issue #424
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bmclaughlin
force-pushed
the
fix-quotes-in-workflows
branch
from
a45a623 to
688e602
Compare
bmclaughlin
force-pushed
the
fix-quotes-in-workflows
branch
from
688e602 to
8f5729b
Compare
bmclaughlin
requested review from
Tompage1994,
djdanielsson and
sean-m-sullivan
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
Get the workflows running again. The input definitions were missing for ci_workflow in the local reusable github actions. This PR adds them.
How should this be tested?
Due to the fix being in the reusable local workflow files, the ci_standalone and ci_dab_jwt workflows still won't run on this PR. I'm opening an additional PR in a few minutes that should have the workflows running due to this PR.
Is there a relevant Issue open for this?
No
Other Relevant info, PRs, etc
All other PRs recently that the CI hasn't even started. :(