Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support ws or wss proto #8877

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 15, 2020

Conversation

jakemcdermott
Copy link
Contributor

@jakemcdermott jakemcdermott commented Dec 11, 2020

SUMMARY

Use ws when on http and wss when on https

related: #8881

@jakemcdermott jakemcdermott force-pushed the ws-proto branch 2 times, most recently from 2e317e7 to 97cfbcc Compare December 12, 2020 00:08
@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link
Contributor

Build succeeded.

@unlikelyzero
Copy link

Note: no additional coverage is needed. Once e2e is 🟢 this will be implicitly tested

Copy link
Member

@AlexSCorey AlexSCorey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me.

@jakemcdermott
Copy link
Contributor Author

jakemcdermott commented Dec 15, 2020

re:

Note: no additional coverage is needed. Once e2e is green_circle this will be implicitly tested

1 e2e failure: https://dashboard.cypress.io/projects/ui2mq7/runs/3606/overview

...but it's the workflow visualizer notifications tab test which I've observed to be flakey and failing occasionally on other branches: e.g: https://dashboard.cypress.io/projects/ui2mq7/runs/3607/overview

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link
Contributor

Build succeeded (gate pipeline).

@softwarefactory-project-zuul softwarefactory-project-zuul bot merged commit 3ae6ea9 into ansible:devel Dec 15, 2020
@jakemcdermott
Copy link
Contributor Author

related: #8932

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants