Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: add description of init container image definition #1779

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 27, 2024

Conversation

zaki-lknr
Copy link
Contributor

SUMMARY

Add init_container_image parameter.
This parameter is not dependent of ee_images settings. Therefore, use it when we want to pull a custom image or from private cotainer registry (e.g. disconnected internet).

ISSUE TYPE
  • Bug, Docs Fix or other nominal change
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Copy link
Contributor

@kurokobo kurokobo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zaki-lknr
Hi, thanks for sending helpful PR to improve docs! 😃
I've leave some minor comments, could you please check if you would like?

Copy link
Contributor

@kurokobo kurokobo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for updating!
LGTM, but I don't have any permission to do anything, so I can only comment on this😞

Copy link
Member

@rooftopcellist rooftopcellist left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zaki-lknr Thanks for adding this improvement to the docs!

I think it might be useful to (in a follow-up PR) add a sample AWX custom resource yaml file for disconnected environment, like what we did here for resource requests and limits configuration, etc. Then link to it from these docs so that folks can copy, paste and fill out their specific internal registry urls.

@rooftopcellist rooftopcellist merged commit 809491b into ansible:devel Mar 27, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants