Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relocate receptor cert and key file location #1442

Merged

Conversation

TheRealHaoLiu
Copy link
Member

@TheRealHaoLiu TheRealHaoLiu commented Jun 6, 2023

SUMMARY

Rename/relocate file for receptor tls cert mount points
Rename/relocate file for receptor work signing keys mount points

related to ansible/awx#14091

ISSUE TYPE
  • Bug, Docs Fix or other nominal change
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

/etc/receptor/signing/work-private-key.pem -> /etc/receptor/work_private_key.pem

/etc/receptor/signing/work-public-key.pem -> /etc/receptor/work_public_key.pem
@TheRealHaoLiu
Copy link
Member Author

CI faiure due to require ansible/awx#14091 to be merged

/etc/receptor/tls/ca/receptor-ca.key -> /etc/receptor/tls/ca/mesh-CA.key

/etc/receptor/tls/ca/receptor-ca.crt -> /etc/receptor/tls/ca/mesh-CA.crt

/etc/receptor/signing/work-private-key.pem -> /etc/receptor/work_private_key.pem

/etc/receptor/signing/work-public-key.pem -> /etc/receptor/work_public_key.pem

Update task.yaml.j2
@TheRealHaoLiu TheRealHaoLiu force-pushed the relocate-receptor-cert-n-keys branch from ad1c428 to a868e98 Compare June 9, 2023 17:53
@TheRealHaoLiu TheRealHaoLiu merged commit a5e29ae into ansible:devel Jun 9, 2023
@TheRealHaoLiu TheRealHaoLiu deleted the relocate-receptor-cert-n-keys branch June 9, 2023 18:19
@AlanCoding
Copy link
Member

I updated the title of ansible/awx#14098 and merged it, because it seems apparent that work signing for remote execution nodes won't work unless these 2 are merged together.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants