This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 9, 2024. It is now read-only.
Move the package under the @ansible scope
#10
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
webknjaz
added
enhancement
webknjaz
requested review from
jimi-c,
relrod,
ssbarnea,
ganeshrn,
cidrblock,
priyamsahoo and
a team
webknjaz
commented
Sep 8, 2021
ssbarnea
approved these changes
Sep 9, 2021
relrod
approved these changes
Sep 13, 2021
ssbarnea
removed
help wanted
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
On the team call and in private discussions, we've decided to republish this dist under an
@ansibleorg that we apparently have access to.The only thing undecided is whether we want
@ansible/ansible-language-serveror@ansible/language-server.Most of the folks agreed on the former but since @relrod and @cidrblock are on PTO, they didn't get to vote and so this PR mustn't be merged until we get approvals or other opinions from them. This is why I'm marking this as a draft for now but everybody else should feel free to leave reviews meanwhile (although, it's optional).