Ansible collections for USGv6R1 related features

[pprakashsamy]

SUMMARY

1. Addition of USGv6R1 feature related attributes in Enterprise SONiC resource module:
   Data definitions in 'argspec'.
   Implementation of 'facts' to gather facts for the module.
   Implementation of 'config' to apply configurations for merged and deleted states.
2. Definition of regression test cases to verify correct functionality of USGv6R1 related attributes.

ISSUE TYPE

• Feature Pull Request

COMPONENT NAME
sonic_l3_interfaces

OUTPUT
Test Result:
Regression_USGv6R1_Ansible.pdf

Latest:
regression-2024-06-10-15-57-23.zip

DEPENDANT PR:
ansible-network/resource_module_models#255

Checklist:

• I have performed a self-review of my own code to ensure there are no formatting, linting, or security issues
• I have verified that new and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• I have not allowed coverage numbers to degenerate
• I have maintained at least 90% code coverage
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

[kerry-meyer]

Thank you for making the incremental changes to address the pending review comments.

I triggered a run of the sanity tests after the latest pushes to the PR branch and there are some failures that need to be addressed before this PR can be approved and merged:

• Please fix the UT failure for the l3_interfaces module (See the "Details" link for "Code coverage / Code coverage | Python 3.10 (pull_request) Failing after 33s ".)

• Please fix the sanity failures (related to a changed documentation block in the l3_interfaces "module" file).

---

Also, the most recently posted regression test summary output is not readable. Please generate a new one that is a readable ".pdf" file (by printing the verbose '.html' regression test summary file for the regression run to a ".pdf" file).

[kerry-meyer]

The proposed change set and corresponding test results look good.

I am requesting two very minor documentation changes (single line changes). No regression test re-run is needed after pushing these changes.

[kerry-meyer]

Since deletion of the address causes deletion of the eui64 bool regardless of whether the bool deletion is explicitly requested, the user doesn't need to specify "eui64: True" to do the deletion for this case. It would provide better guidance to our users to omit this line in the example.

[kerry-meyer]

Thank you for making the final set of requested incremental changes.

The current set of proposed changes and corresponding test results look good.

Thank you very much for providing the code changes for support of the USGv6R1 related changes.

Approved.