Support for WifiWave2.

[ytimenkov]

Added configuration profiles to configure Mikrotik APs which have only WifiWave2 package.

SUMMARY

New Access Points like capAX don't have support for the previous "wireless" module and shipped only with WifiWave 2.
This Pull Requests adds some settings to enable configuring such APs with ansible.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Documentation and parameters can be found in the Mikrotiks wiki: https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/display/ROS/WifiWave2

Current settings are more profile-based. I.e. the expectation is to create (say) channel profile and then use it further.
However Mikrotik allows specifying all options "in-place" or override ones coming from profile:

        path: interface wifiwave2 security
        data:
          - name: lan-auth
            authentication-types: wpa2-psk,wpa3-psk
...
        path: interface wifiwave2 configuration
        data:
          - name: lan-conf
            security: lan-auth

vs

        path: interface wifiwave2 configuration
        data:
          - name: lan-conf
            security.authentication-types: wpa2-psk,wpa3-psk

The latter is not implemented, but I can add it if required.

[github-actions]

Docs Build 📝

Thank you for contribution!✨

This PR has been merged and the docs are now incorporated into main:
https://ansible-collections.github.io/community.routeros/branch/main

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (ac89aa0) 82.92% compared to head (103efe1) 82.97%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #226      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.92%   82.97%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          32       32              
  Lines        4046     4046              
  Branches      871      871              
==========================================
+ Hits         3355     3357       +2     
  Misses        506      506              
+ Partials      185      183       -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	66.86% <ø> (ø)
sanity	22.10% <100.00%> (+0.09%)	⬆️
units	82.91% <100.00%> (+0.05%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[felixfontein]

Hmm, I know to little about that endpoint (and don't have enough time right now to read into it) to be able to answer your question, but I guess this needs some more thought.

[felixfontein]

Sorry for not writing back earlier. I've been able to ask @derdeagle for some feedback on this. His suggestions was to version it (see my comment below), and to potentially also implement more related paths (interface wifiwave2 access-list, interface wifiwave2 provisioning, interface wifiwave2 capsman, interface wifiwave2 cap) - but that could also happen later (i.e. outside this PR).

[felixfontein]

@ytimenkov thanks a lot for your contribution!
@derdeagle thanks a lot for reviewing this!

And sorry this took so long...