ipv4, ipv6, ipsubnet have moved from ansible.netcommon to ansible.utils #635
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Build succeeded.
|
ansibullbot
added
bug
alinabuzachis
approved these changes
Jan 27, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@sebastien-rosset Thank you for taking time to work on this. Could you please add a changelog fragment?
|
@alinabuzachis yes we should backport it so CI is working for that branch, thanks! |
alinabuzachis
added
backport-2
|
Build succeeded (gate pipeline).
|
Backport to stable-2: 💚 backport PR created✅ Backport PR branch: Backported as #659 🤖 @patchback |
patchback bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2022
…ls (#635) ipv4, ipv6, ipsubnet have moved from ansible.netcommon to ansible.utils SUMMARY This is a maintenance task to migrate from ansible.netcommon to ansible.utils. I was trying to fix an issue in that module, but I was told the functions have moved to ansible.utils. See ansible-collections/ansible.netcommon#362 (comment) ISSUE TYPE Bugfix Pull Request COMPONENT NAME Existing integration tests that use the ansible.netcommon module. No module uses netcommon, only integration tests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Reviewed-by: Alina Buzachis <None> (cherry picked from commit 0db6ac1)
Backport to stable-3: 💚 backport PR created✅ Backport PR branch: Backported as #661 🤖 @patchback |
patchback bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2022
…ls (#635) ipv4, ipv6, ipsubnet have moved from ansible.netcommon to ansible.utils SUMMARY This is a maintenance task to migrate from ansible.netcommon to ansible.utils. I was trying to fix an issue in that module, but I was told the functions have moved to ansible.utils. See ansible-collections/ansible.netcommon#362 (comment) ISSUE TYPE Bugfix Pull Request COMPONENT NAME Existing integration tests that use the ansible.netcommon module. No module uses netcommon, only integration tests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Reviewed-by: Alina Buzachis <None> (cherry picked from commit 0db6ac1)
softwarefactory-project-zuul bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2022
…ls (#635) (#661) [PR #635/0db6ac10 backport][stable-3] ipv4, ipv6, ipsubnet have moved from ansible.netcommon to ansible.utils This is a backport of PR #635 as merged into main (0db6ac1). SUMMARY This is a maintenance task to migrate from ansible.netcommon to ansible.utils. I was trying to fix an issue in that module, but I was told the functions have moved to ansible.utils. See ansible-collections/ansible.netcommon#362 (comment) ISSUE TYPE Bugfix Pull Request COMPONENT NAME Existing integration tests that use the ansible.netcommon module. No module uses netcommon, only integration tests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
softwarefactory-project-zuul bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 9, 2022
…ls (#635) (#659) [PR #635/0db6ac10 backport][stable-2] ipv4, ipv6, ipsubnet have moved from ansible.netcommon to ansible.utils This is a backport of PR #635 as merged into main (0db6ac1). SUMMARY This is a maintenance task to migrate from ansible.netcommon to ansible.utils. I was trying to fix an issue in that module, but I was told the functions have moved to ansible.utils. See ansible-collections/ansible.netcommon#362 (comment) ISSUE TYPE Bugfix Pull Request COMPONENT NAME Existing integration tests that use the ansible.netcommon module. No module uses netcommon, only integration tests. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
abikouo
pushed a commit
to abikouo/amazon.aws
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2023
…templates Add Issue Templates/Forms SUMMARY We've had a number of issues posted recently without the templates. This results in maintainers needing to guess to fill in the blanks. Use forms rather than the default template to make it harder to skip things like examples. ISSUE TYPE Feature Pull Request COMPONENT NAME .github ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Based on ansible-collections#400 and ansible-collections#401 Reviewed-by: Alina Buzachis <None>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
SUMMARY
This is a maintenance task to migrate from ansible.netcommon to ansible.utils. I was trying to fix an issue in that module, but I was told the functions have moved to ansible.utils. See ansible-collections/ansible.netcommon#362 (comment)
ISSUE TYPE
COMPONENT NAME
Existing integration tests that use the ansible.netcommon module. No module uses netcommon, only integration tests.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION