-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 343
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow to disable encryption on cloudtrail #1384
Allow to disable encryption on cloudtrail #1384
Conversation
Docs Build 📝Thank you for contribution!✨ This PR has been merged and your docs changes will be incorporated when they are next published. |
09faa5f
to
949e615
Compare
Build succeeded. ✔️ ansible-galaxy-importer SUCCESS in 4m 23s |
Build succeeded. ✔️ ansible-galaxy-importer SUCCESS in 4m 56s |
Signed-off-by: Alina Buzachis <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alina Buzachis <[email protected]>
7b17fc3
to
7b89b70
Compare
Build succeeded. ✔️ ansible-galaxy-importer SUCCESS in 4m 36s |
Build succeeded (gate pipeline). ✔️ ansible-galaxy-importer SUCCESS in 3m 53s |
Backport to stable-5: 💚 backport PR created✅ Backport PR branch: Backported as #1385 🤖 @patchback |
Allow to disable encryption on cloudtrail SUMMARY Allow to disable encryption on cloudtrail. Note: Tests are not run in CI because of missing policy. ISSUE TYPE Bugfix Pull Request Docs Pull Request Feature Pull Request New Module Pull Request COMPONENT NAME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Reviewed-by: Mark Chappell (cherry picked from commit 200392e)
[PR #1384/200392e0 backport][stable-5] Allow to disable encryption on cloudtrail This is a backport of PR #1384 as merged into main (200392e). SUMMARY Allow to disable encryption on cloudtrail. Note: Tests are not run in CI because of missing policy. ISSUE TYPE Bugfix Pull Request Docs Pull Request Feature Pull Request New Module Pull Request COMPONENT NAME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Reviewed-by: Mark Chappell
…#1384) route53_info - fix max_items when not paginating SUMMARY As reported in ansible-collections#1383, the route53_info module presently fails to run with a boto3 parameter validation error if run with particular combinations of parameters, specifically: query: hosted_zone parameter with hosted_zone_method: list_by_name query: reusable_delegation_set without specifying a delegation_set_id I believe this is a regression introduced in ansible-collections#813 ISSUE TYPE Bugfix Pull Request COMPONENT NAME route53_info ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Some further information is described in the issue but tl;dr the prior PR converted all cases in the module where params['MaxItems'] was set to instead pass a params['PaginationConfig'], however this should only be done if a boto3 paginator is actually being used, and will fail (as noted above, due to parameter validation) if called with a regular boto3 client method. Hence this PR switches back to directly setting MaxItems on the methods that do not use a paginator. Reviewed-by: Mark Chappell <None> This commit was initially merged in https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.aws See: ansible-collections/community.aws@569fff4
route53_info - enable max_items tests SUMMARY Enables the tests from ansible-collections#1384 ISSUE TYPE Feature Pull Request COMPONENT NAME route53_info ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This commit was initially merged in https://github.com/ansible-collections/community.aws See: ansible-collections/community.aws@7427a0d
…#1384) route53_info - fix max_items when not paginating SUMMARY As reported in ansible-collections#1383, the route53_info module presently fails to run with a boto3 parameter validation error if run with particular combinations of parameters, specifically: query: hosted_zone parameter with hosted_zone_method: list_by_name query: reusable_delegation_set without specifying a delegation_set_id I believe this is a regression introduced in ansible-collections#813 ISSUE TYPE Bugfix Pull Request COMPONENT NAME route53_info ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Some further information is described in the issue but tl;dr the prior PR converted all cases in the module where params['MaxItems'] was set to instead pass a params['PaginationConfig'], however this should only be done if a boto3 paginator is actually being used, and will fail (as noted above, due to parameter validation) if called with a regular boto3 client method. Hence this PR switches back to directly setting MaxItems on the methods that do not use a paginator. Reviewed-by: Mark Chappell <None>
…#1384) route53_info - fix max_items when not paginating SUMMARY As reported in ansible-collections#1383, the route53_info module presently fails to run with a boto3 parameter validation error if run with particular combinations of parameters, specifically: query: hosted_zone parameter with hosted_zone_method: list_by_name query: reusable_delegation_set without specifying a delegation_set_id I believe this is a regression introduced in ansible-collections#813 ISSUE TYPE Bugfix Pull Request COMPONENT NAME route53_info ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Some further information is described in the issue but tl;dr the prior PR converted all cases in the module where params['MaxItems'] was set to instead pass a params['PaginationConfig'], however this should only be done if a boto3 paginator is actually being used, and will fail (as noted above, due to parameter validation) if called with a regular boto3 client method. Hence this PR switches back to directly setting MaxItems on the methods that do not use a paginator. Reviewed-by: Mark Chappell <None>
…#1384) route53_info - fix max_items when not paginating SUMMARY As reported in ansible-collections#1383, the route53_info module presently fails to run with a boto3 parameter validation error if run with particular combinations of parameters, specifically: query: hosted_zone parameter with hosted_zone_method: list_by_name query: reusable_delegation_set without specifying a delegation_set_id I believe this is a regression introduced in ansible-collections#813 ISSUE TYPE Bugfix Pull Request COMPONENT NAME route53_info ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Some further information is described in the issue but tl;dr the prior PR converted all cases in the module where params['MaxItems'] was set to instead pass a params['PaginationConfig'], however this should only be done if a boto3 paginator is actually being used, and will fail (as noted above, due to parameter validation) if called with a regular boto3 client method. Hence this PR switches back to directly setting MaxItems on the methods that do not use a paginator. Reviewed-by: Mark Chappell <None>
route53_info - enable max_items tests SUMMARY Enables the tests from ansible-collections#1384 ISSUE TYPE Feature Pull Request COMPONENT NAME route53_info ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
SUMMARY
Allow to disable encryption on cloudtrail.
Note: Tests are not run in CI because of missing policy.
ISSUE TYPE
COMPONENT NAME
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION