Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🚀 Wait for mutate phase before layoutCallback #20814

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 14, 2019

Conversation

jridgewell
Copy link
Contributor

@jridgewell jridgewell commented Feb 12, 2019

Resources itself is in a measure phase when it schedules layoutCallbacks.

Fixes #20770

Resources itself is in a measure phase when it schedules layoutCallbacks.
@jridgewell jridgewell changed the title 🚀Wait for mutate phase before layoutCallback 🚀 Wait for mutate phase before layoutCallback Feb 12, 2019
Copy link
Member

@cramforce cramforce left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm, uhm, scared and/or happy if this doesn't break any tests.

Let's wait for @dvoytenko before merging.

@jridgewell jridgewell merged commit b734396 into ampproject:master Feb 14, 2019
@jridgewell jridgewell deleted the startLayout-mutate-phase branch February 14, 2019 23:38
noranazmy pushed a commit to noranazmy/amphtml that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2019
* Wait for mutate phase before layoutCallback

Resources itself is in a measure phase when it schedules layoutCallbacks.

* Lint

* Fix resource tests

* Fix integration tests

* Attempt to fix carousel tests

* Skip broken integration tests
bramanudom pushed a commit to bramanudom/amphtml that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2019
* Wait for mutate phase before layoutCallback

Resources itself is in a measure phase when it schedules layoutCallbacks.

* Lint

* Fix resource tests

* Fix integration tests

* Attempt to fix carousel tests

* Skip broken integration tests
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants