Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding threadId to response and improving response initialiser #3

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

valeksiev
Copy link
Collaborator

@valeksiev valeksiev commented Dec 12, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new optional attribute thread_id in the Response class for better identification.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced error handling for missing fields in the Response class, improving robustness.
  • Chores

    • Updated project version from 0.0.1 to 0.0.2 in the configuration file.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the Response class in the alkemio_virtual_contributor_engine/events/response.py file, including the addition of a new optional attribute thread_id and improvements in error handling and default value management. Additionally, the project version in the pyproject.toml file has been updated from "0.0.1" to "0.0.2" with no other changes to dependencies or configurations.

Changes

File Change Summary
alkemio_virtual_contributor_engine/events/response.py Added thread_id attribute to Response class; updated constructor for better error handling and default values; modified to_dict method to include thread_id.
pyproject.toml Incremented project version from "0.0.1" to "0.0.2"; no other changes made.

Poem

In the code where rabbits hop,
A thread_id now takes the top.
With defaults set, and errors caught,
Our responses shine, a clever thought!
Version two, we leap with glee,
Hopping forward, wild and free! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 34f5ab3 and 247bc3e.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • poetry.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • alkemio_virtual_contributor_engine/events/response.py (2 hunks)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@valeksiev valeksiev merged commit 6d8cf0a into develop Dec 12, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@valeksiev valeksiev deleted the v0.0.2 branch December 12, 2024 13:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants