Master to develop #4670
Master to develop #4670
Conversation
Version bump
[0.92.3] Bugfix unable to edit Callout-Whiteboard templates
[v0.93.0] Roles API, Unauthenticated Explore page (Merge conflict fix)
Authorization saved on subspace level
[0.93.1] #Placeholder title#
Minor version bump
Release: VC Data Patch
* Upgrade whiteboard-collaboration-service to 0.5.0 (#4625) Co-authored-by: Valentin Yanakiev <[email protected]> * change search index pattern var (#4640) * Org verification (#4627) * ensure org verification status is set properly after every event * Update src/domain/community/organization-verification/organization.verification.lifecycle.options.provider.ts Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Update src/domain/community/organization-verification/organization.verification.lifecycle.options.provider.ts Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Addressing pr feedback --------- Co-authored-by: Evgeni Dimitrov <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Valentin Yanakiev <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * subspace as a qualified search type * version bump (#4644) --------- Co-authored-by: Carlos Cano <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Valentin Yanakiev <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Neil Smyth <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Evgeni Dimitrov <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This reverts commit bd130dd.
[0.95.0] Subspace Templates, XState v5 upgrade
WalkthroughThe pull request includes updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (12)
src/domain/space/space/dto/space.dto.create.ts (1)
31-32: Consider adding @field decorator for GraphQL schema generation.While the property is correctly typed, consider adding the
@Fielddecorator to maintain consistency with other properties in the DTO if this field needs to be exposed in the GraphQL schema.+ @Field(() => String, { nullable: true }) // For accessing the default templates of the parent space templatesManagerParent?: ITemplatesManager;src/core/bootstrap/platform-template-definitions/subspace/bootstrap.subspace.callouts.ts (2)
18-18: Consider future visibility configuration needsThe visibility property is correctly implemented, but consider if future requirements might need this to be configurable rather than hardcoded to PUBLISHED.
42-42: Consider extracting default visibilitySince both callouts use PUBLISHED visibility, consider extracting this as a default value to reduce duplication and make future changes easier to maintain.
Example implementation:
+ const DEFAULT_CALLOUT_VISIBILITY = CalloutVisibility.PUBLISHED; export const bootstrapSubspaceCallouts: CreateCalloutInput[] = [ { nameID: 'welcome', - visibility: CalloutVisibility.PUBLISHED, + visibility: DEFAULT_CALLOUT_VISIBILITY, // ... }, { nameID: 'collaboration-tools', - visibility: CalloutVisibility.PUBLISHED, + visibility: DEFAULT_CALLOUT_VISIBILITY, // ... } ];src/domain/collaboration/collaboration/collaboration.service.authorization.ts (3)
Line range hint
65-70: LGTM with a minor suggestion for the error message.The simplified error handling correctly checks for essential child entities. Consider making the error message more specific by indicating which child entities are missing.
- throw new RelationshipNotFoundException( - `Unable to load child entities for collaboration authorization: ${collaboration.id}`, - LogContext.SPACES - ); + throw new RelationshipNotFoundException( + `Unable to load required child entities (callouts, innovationFlow) for collaboration authorization: ${collaboration.id}`, + LogContext.SPACES + );
Line range hint
120-126: LGTM with a suggestion for more detailed error handling.The addition of the
innovationFlow.profilecheck improves validation. Consider enhancing the error message to be more specific about which relationships are missing.- throw new RelationshipNotFoundException( - `Unable to load child entities for collaboration authorization children: ${collaboration.id}`, - LogContext.SPACES - ); + throw new RelationshipNotFoundException( + `Unable to load required child entities (callouts, innovationFlow, or innovationFlow.profile) for collaboration authorization children: ${collaboration.id}`, + LogContext.SPACES + );
146-147: LGTM with a suggestion for more explicit conditions.The comment and condition correctly handle the timeline authorization for non-template collaborations. Consider making the condition more explicit by grouping related checks.
- // Collaboration templates don't have timeline so this won't be executed for them - if (roleSet && spaceSettings && collaboration.timeline) { + // Skip timeline authorization for templates (they don't have timelines) + const hasRequiredContext = roleSet && spaceSettings; + const hasTimeline = collaboration.timeline !== undefined; + if (hasRequiredContext && hasTimeline) {src/domain/template/template/template.service.ts (1)
272-273: Consider using WhiteboardService for content updates.Direct assignment to
whiteboard.contentbypasses any validation or processing logic that might exist in theWhiteboardService. Consider using a service method to handle the content update.- template.whiteboard.content = templateData.whiteboardContent; + template.whiteboard = await this.whiteboardService.updateWhiteboardContent( + template.whiteboard.id, + templateData.whiteboardContent + );src/domain/collaboration/collaboration/collaboration.service.ts (2)
229-235: Consider extracting comment enabling logic to a separate method.The conditional logic for enabling comments could be more maintainable by extracting it into a dedicated method.
- if ( - calloutDefault.isTemplate === false && - calloutDefault.type === CalloutType.POST && - calloutDefault.contributionPolicy?.state === CalloutState.OPEN - ) { - calloutDefault.enableComments = true; - } + calloutDefault.enableComments = this.shouldEnableComments(calloutDefault); + private shouldEnableComments(callout: CreateCalloutInput): boolean { + return !callout.isTemplate && + callout.type === CalloutType.POST && + callout.contributionPolicy?.state === CalloutState.OPEN; + }
Line range hint
795-812: Consider improving the method's structure and type definitions.The renamed method could benefit from the following improvements:
- Extract the callout type definition to an interface
- Split the group and flow state handling into separate methods
- Consider using early returns to reduce nesting
+ interface CalloutWithTagsets { + framing: { + profile: { + tagsets?: { + name: string; + type?: TagsetType; + tags?: string[]; + }[]; + }; + }; + } public moveCalloutsToDefaultGroupAndState( validGroupNames: string[], validFlowStateNames: string[], - callouts: { - framing: { - profile: { - tagsets?: { - name: string; - type?: TagsetType; - tags?: string[]; - }[]; - }; - }; - }[] + callouts: CalloutWithTagsets[] ): void {src/domain/space/space/space.service.ts (1)
877-877: Add null check for templatesManagerWhile the template manager integration looks good, consider adding a null check before using the parent's templatesManager to prevent potential issues if the parent space's template manager is not properly initialized.
if (!space.storageAggregator || !space.community) { throw new EntityNotFoundException( `Unable to retrieve entities on space for creating subspace: ${space.id}`, LogContext.SPACES ); } +if (!space.templatesManager) { + throw new EntityNotFoundException( + `Unable to retrieve templatesManager on space for creating subspace: ${space.id}`, + LogContext.SPACES + ); +}Also applies to: 911-911
src/domain/template/template-applier/template.applier.service.ts (1)
121-124: Specify the return type of 'applyAuthorizationPolicyToNewCallouts' for clarityThe current return type
Promise<unknown>is not specific. Specifying the exact return type enhances type safety and code readability.Apply the following diff to specify the return type:
-private async applyAuthorizationPolicyToNewCallouts( +private async applyAuthorizationPolicyToNewCallouts( targetCollaboration: ICollaboration, newCallouts: ICallout[] -): Promise<unknown> { +): Promise<IAuthorizationPolicy[]> {src/domain/space/space.defaults/space.defaults.service.ts (1)
65-71: Include error details in warning logs for better diagnosticsCurrently, the catch block logs a warning without the error details. Including the error information can aid in debugging and provide more context.
Consider updating the logger call to include the error object:
this.logger.warn( `Space does not have a subspace default template, using platform default. parentSpaceTemplatesManager.id: ${parentSpaceTemplatesManager?.id}`, + { error: e }, LogContext.TEMPLATES );This modification adds the error stack trace or message to the logs, facilitating easier troubleshooting.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
package.json(1 hunks)src/core/bootstrap/platform-template-definitions/space-tutorials/bootstrap.space.tutorials.callouts.ts(8 hunks)src/core/bootstrap/platform-template-definitions/space/bootstrap.space.callouts.ts(2 hunks)src/core/bootstrap/platform-template-definitions/subspace-knowledge/bootstrap.subspace.knowledge.callouts.ts(12 hunks)src/core/bootstrap/platform-template-definitions/subspace/bootstrap.subspace.callouts.ts(3 hunks)src/domain/collaboration/collaboration/collaboration.service.authorization.ts(3 hunks)src/domain/collaboration/collaboration/collaboration.service.ts(7 hunks)src/domain/space/space.defaults/space.defaults.service.ts(5 hunks)src/domain/space/space/dto/space.dto.create.ts(2 hunks)src/domain/space/space/space.service.ts(3 hunks)src/domain/template/template-applier/template.applier.service.ts(2 hunks)src/domain/template/template/template.service.ts(3 hunks)src/migrations/1729511643555-templatesManager.ts(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/migrations/1729511643555-templatesManager.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- package.json
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (11)
src/core/bootstrap/platform-template-definitions/space-tutorials/bootstrap.space.tutorials.callouts.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/core/bootstrap/platform-template-definitions/space/bootstrap.space.callouts.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/core/bootstrap/platform-template-definitions/subspace-knowledge/bootstrap.subspace.knowledge.callouts.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/core/bootstrap/platform-template-definitions/subspace/bootstrap.subspace.callouts.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/collaboration/collaboration/collaboration.service.authorization.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/collaboration/collaboration/collaboration.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/space/space.defaults/space.defaults.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/space/space/dto/space.dto.create.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/space/space/space.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/template/template-applier/template.applier.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/template/template/template.service.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
🔇 Additional comments (18)
src/core/bootstrap/platform-template-definitions/space/bootstrap.space.callouts.ts (2)
8-8: LGTM! Clean import addition.
The import follows the established pattern and maintains consistency with other enum imports.
19-19: LGTM! Consistent visibility property addition.
The visibility property is correctly set using the CalloutVisibility enum, maintaining consistency with similar changes across other callout definitions.
src/domain/space/space/dto/space.dto.create.ts (1)
10-10: LGTM! Clean implementation of templates manager inheritance.
The addition of templatesManagerParent property follows the established pattern of parent-child relationships in the codebase, similar to storageAggregatorParent. The implementation maintains type safety and includes clear documentation.
Also applies to: 31-32
src/core/bootstrap/platform-template-definitions/subspace/bootstrap.subspace.callouts.ts (1)
7-7: LGTM: Import statement follows best practices
The import is correctly placed with other related enum imports and follows TypeScript conventions.
src/core/bootstrap/platform-template-definitions/space-tutorials/bootstrap.space.tutorials.callouts.ts (2)
8-8: LGTM: Import statement follows best practices
The import of CalloutVisibility enum is properly placed with other related enum imports.
19-19: Verify if all callouts should default to PUBLISHED
While the implementation is consistent, consider if:
- Some callouts might need different visibility states
- The visibility should be configurable rather than hardcoded
- There should be a default visibility state defined in a constant
Also applies to: 42-42, 65-65, 88-88, 111-111, 134-134, 157-157
✅ Verification successful
Let me check if there's a default visibility configuration or other visibility states defined.
Setting all callouts to PUBLISHED is appropriate for bootstrap templates
The current implementation is correct because:
- The
CalloutVisibilityenum supports bothDRAFTandPUBLISHEDstates - Bootstrap templates represent pre-configured, ready-to-use content that should be immediately visible
- The codebase shows that
DRAFTis used as the default for user-created callouts (seecallout.service.ts) - All other bootstrap template callouts across different spaces consistently use
PUBLISHEDvisibility
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if other callout configurations use different visibility states
rg -g "*.ts" "visibility:\s*CalloutVisibility" -A 1 -B 1
Length of output: 8734
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for CalloutVisibility enum definition and any default values
ast-grep --pattern 'enum CalloutVisibility {
$$$
}'
# Check for any other visibility states or default configurations
rg -g "*.ts" "CalloutVisibility\." -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 21006
src/core/bootstrap/platform-template-definitions/subspace-knowledge/bootstrap.subspace.knowledge.callouts.ts (2)
7-7: LGTM! Import follows established patterns.
The new CalloutVisibility enum import is properly placed with other enum imports and follows the established import pattern.
18-18: LGTM! Consistent visibility property addition.
The visibility property has been consistently added to all callouts with the appropriate PUBLISHED value, which aligns with the bootstrap data nature of these callouts.
Also applies to: 41-41, 64-64, 87-87, 110-110, 133-133, 156-156, 179-179, 202-202, 225-225, 248-248
src/domain/template/template/template.service.ts (2)
244-245: LGTM! Good performance optimization.
The conditional selection of fields based on template type helps minimize unnecessary data fetching.
287-287: LGTM! Proper relation loading.
Adding the collaboration relation ensures proper cleanup during template deletion and prevents orphaned records.
src/domain/collaboration/collaboration/collaboration.service.ts (2)
103-105: LGTM! Timeline creation logic is well-implemented.
The conditional timeline creation for non-template collaborations is a good optimization.
363-366: LGTM! Timeline deletion logic is consistent.
The conditional timeline deletion properly handles template collaborations and includes helpful documentation.
src/domain/space/space/space.service.ts (1)
221-222: LGTM: Template manager integration for collaboration creation
The addition of templatesManagerParent parameter enables proper template inheritance during collaboration creation.
src/domain/template/template-applier/template.applier.service.ts (1)
96-120: 'ensureCalloutsInValidGroupsAndStates' method is well-implemented
The method correctly validates the presence of innovationFlow and callouts, retrieves valid group names and flow states, and ensures callouts are moved to default groups and states appropriately.
src/domain/space/space.defaults/space.defaults.service.ts (4)
1-1: Correct addition of necessary imports
The inclusion of Inject and LoggerService from @nestjs/common aligns with NestJS best practices for dependency injection and logging.
28-29: Added new imports for template management and logging
The imports of ITemplatesManager from @domain/template/templates-manager and WINSTON_MODULE_NEST_PROVIDER from nest-winston are appropriate for the added functionality.
44-45: Extended method signature enhances flexibility
Adding the optional parameter parentSpaceTemplatesManager?: ITemplatesManager to createCollaborationInput increases the method's versatility and supports additional use cases.
181-181: Method call updated for consistency
Renaming the method to moveCalloutsToDefaultGroupAndState and updating the call ensures consistency across the codebase and improves code readability.
...ap/platform-template-definitions/subspace-knowledge/bootstrap.subspace.knowledge.callouts.ts
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/domain/collaboration/callout/callout.resolver.mutations.ts (2)
Line range hint
125-142: Use the updated callout object in notifications and activity logsIn the
updateCalloutVisibilitymethod, you are using the originalcalloutobject instead of the updatedsavedCalloutwhen creating thenotificationInputandactivityLogInput. To ensure the notifications and activity logs reflect the latest state of the callout, especially after visibility changes, you should usesavedCallout.Apply this diff to fix the issue:
if (calloutData.sendNotification) { const notificationInput: NotificationInputCalloutPublished = { triggeredBy: agentInfo.userID, - callout: callout, + callout: savedCallout, }; await this.notificationAdapter.calloutPublished(notificationInput); } const activityLogInput: ActivityInputCalloutPublished = { triggeredBy: agentInfo.userID, - callout: callout, + callout: savedCallout, }; this.activityAdapter.calloutPublished(activityLogInput);
Line range hint
189-195: Consistently use braces for allifstatementsFor better readability and to prevent potential errors, it's recommended to always use braces
{}forifstatements, even when the body contains only a single statement.Apply this diff to improve consistency:
if (callout.contributionPolicy.state === CalloutState.CLOSED) { - if ( - !this.authorizationService.isAccessGranted( - agentInfo, - callout.authorization, - AuthorizationPrivilege.UPDATE - ) - ) + if ( + !this.authorizationService.isAccessGranted( + agentInfo, + callout.authorization, + AuthorizationPrivilege.UPDATE + ) + ) { throw new CalloutClosedException( `New contributions to a closed Callout with id: '${callout.id}' are not allowed!` ); + } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/domain/collaboration/callout/callout.resolver.mutations.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/domain/collaboration/callout/callout.resolver.mutations.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/domain/collaboration/callout/callout.resolver.mutations.ts (2)
Line range hint 55-68: Deletion logic correctly implemented
The deleteCallout mutation method correctly retrieves the callout, verifies authorization, and deletes the callout as expected.
Line range hint 70-84: Update logic is properly implemented
The updateCallout mutation method appropriately retrieves the callout, checks authorization, and updates the callout with the provided data.
…pproval Fix community application self-approval
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
src/domain/access/role-set/role.set.service.lifecycle.application.ts (1)
36-44: Consider adding error handling for authorization failures.While the implementation is correct, it might be beneficial to add explicit error handling or logging when authorization fails to help with debugging and monitoring.
Consider wrapping the authorization check:
hasApplicationAcceptPrivilege: ({ event }) => { const agentInfo: AgentInfo = event.agentInfo; const authorizationPolicy: IAuthorizationPolicy = event.authorization; - return this.authorizationService.isAccessGranted( - agentInfo, - authorizationPolicy, - AuthorizationPrivilege.COMMUNITY_APPLY_ACCEPT - ); + try { + const isGranted = this.authorizationService.isAccessGranted( + agentInfo, + authorizationPolicy, + AuthorizationPrivilege.COMMUNITY_APPLY_ACCEPT + ); + if (!isGranted) { + this.logger.debug( + `Access denied for COMMUNITY_APPLY_ACCEPT privilege`, + { agentId: agentInfo.id } + ); + } + return isGranted; + } catch (error) { + this.logger.error( + `Error checking COMMUNITY_APPLY_ACCEPT privilege`, + { error, agentId: agentInfo.id } + ); + return false; + } },src/common/enums/authorization.privilege.ts (1)
33-33: Consider adding JSDoc comments for privilege groups.The enum has several logical groups of privileges (e.g., CRUD, community-related, etc.). Consider adding JSDoc comments to document these groups and their purposes.
Example documentation:
+ /** Community membership and application privileges */ COMMUNITY_JOIN = 'community-join', COMMUNITY_APPLY = 'community-apply', COMMUNITY_APPLY_ACCEPT = 'community-apply-accept',src/domain/access/application/application.service.lifecycle.ts (1)
Line range hint
63-67: Review asymmetric privilege requirements in state transitionsThe state machine uses different privileges for accept and reject flows:
- Accept flow (NEW->APPROVING->APPROVED) uses 'hasApplicationAcceptPrivilege'
- Reject flow uses 'hasUpdatePrivilege'
This asymmetry might indicate inconsistent authorization design. Consider whether reject actions should also use the more specific privilege.
Also applies to: 75-78
src/domain/access/application/application.service.authorization.ts (1)
71-84: Consider extracting the privilege rule creation to a constantThe implementation is correct, but the privilege rule creation could be moved to a constant for better reusability and consistency.
Consider applying this refactor:
+// In authorization policy constants file +export const COMMUNITY_APPLY_ACCEPT_PRIVILEGE = new AuthorizationPolicyRulePrivilege( + [AuthorizationPrivilege.COMMUNITY_APPLY_ACCEPT], + AuthorizationPrivilege.GRANT, + POLICY_RULE_COMMUNITY_APPROVE_APPLICATION +); private appendPrivilegeRules( authorization: IAuthorizationPolicy ): IAuthorizationPolicy { - const approveApplicationPrivilege = new AuthorizationPolicyRulePrivilege( - [AuthorizationPrivilege.COMMUNITY_APPLY_ACCEPT], - AuthorizationPrivilege.GRANT, - POLICY_RULE_COMMUNITY_APPROVE_APPLICATION - ); - return this.authorizationPolicyService.appendPrivilegeAuthorizationRules( authorization, - [approveApplicationPrivilege] + [COMMUNITY_APPLY_ACCEPT_PRIVILEGE] ); }src/domain/access/role-set/role.set.resolver.mutations.ts (2)
Line range hint
704-708: Enhance error handling and logging structureWhile logging is present, consider structuring it better with additional context and using more specific error types for better error tracking.
Consider this improvement:
- this.logger.verbose?.( - `Event ${eventData.eventName} triggered on application: ${application.id} using lifecycle ${application.lifecycle.id}`, - LogContext.COMMUNITY - ); + this.logger.verbose?.( + { + message: `Event triggered on application`, + event: eventData.eventName, + applicationId: application.id, + lifecycleId: application.lifecycle.id, + context: LogContext.COMMUNITY + } + );
Line range hint
1-824: Consider splitting the resolver into smaller, focused classesThe
RoleSetResolverMutationsclass has grown quite large and handles multiple concerns (roles, applications, invitations). Consider splitting it into separate resolvers for better maintainability and adherence to the Single Responsibility Principle.Suggested structure:
RoleSetMembershipResolver- for role assignment/removalRoleSetApplicationResolver- for application handlingRoleSetInvitationResolver- for invitation handling
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
package.json(1 hunks)src/common/constants/authorization/policy.rule.constants.ts(1 hunks)src/common/enums/authorization.privilege.ts(1 hunks)src/domain/access/application/application.service.authorization.ts(3 hunks)src/domain/access/application/application.service.lifecycle.ts(2 hunks)src/domain/access/role-set/role.set.resolver.mutations.ts(1 hunks)src/domain/access/role-set/role.set.service.lifecycle.application.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- package.json
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (6)
src/common/constants/authorization/policy.rule.constants.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/common/enums/authorization.privilege.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/access/application/application.service.authorization.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/access/application/application.service.lifecycle.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/access/role-set/role.set.resolver.mutations.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
src/domain/access/role-set/role.set.service.lifecycle.application.ts (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/common/constants/authorization/policy.rule.constants.ts (1)
30-31: LGTM! Verify constant usage.
The new policy rule constant follows the established naming conventions and is properly integrated into the authorization framework.
Let's verify the constant's usage across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Policy rule constant is properly integrated and used
The constant is correctly used in the ApplicationAuthorizationService where it's integrated into the authorization policy with appropriate privileges for community application approval. The implementation follows the authorization framework's patterns by:
- Importing the constant from the correct location
- Using it to create an AuthorizationPolicyRulePrivilege
- Associating it with the COMMUNITY_APPLY_ACCEPT privilege
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the new policy rule constant
# Expected: References in ApplicationAuthorizationService and RoleSetResolverMutations
# Test 1: Search for direct string references
rg -l 'policyRule-communityApproveApplication'
# Test 2: Search for constant references
rg -l 'POLICY_RULE_COMMUNITY_APPROVE_APPLICATION'
# Test 3: Search for related authorization checks
ast-grep --pattern 'authorize($_, $POLICY_RULE_COMMUNITY_APPROVE_APPLICATION)'
Length of output: 364
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual usage in the authorization service
rg -A 5 -B 5 "POLICY_RULE_COMMUNITY_APPROVE_APPLICATION" src/domain/access/application/application.service.authorization.ts
# Check for any related authorization rules or patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'class ApplicationAuthorizationService {
$$$
authorize($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Look for any mutation resolvers that might be using this
fd resolver -e ts -x rg -l "POLICY_RULE_COMMUNITY_APPROVE_APPLICATION" {}
Length of output: 1458
src/domain/access/role-set/role.set.service.lifecycle.application.ts (1)
36-44: Implementation looks good, verify privilege definition.
The new guard follows best practices and maintains consistency with the existing codebase. The implementation is clean and properly typed.
Let's verify the new privilege is properly defined:
✅ Verification successful
Privilege is properly defined and consistently used across the codebase
The COMMUNITY_APPLY_ACCEPT privilege is:
- Correctly defined in the authorization enums (
src/common/enums/authorization.privilege.ts) - Consistently used across relevant components:
- Application service authorization
- Role set lifecycle service
- Role set resolver mutations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify COMMUNITY_APPLY_ACCEPT privilege definition and usage
# Test 1: Check if the privilege is defined in the enum
rg "COMMUNITY_APPLY_ACCEPT" --type ts
# Test 2: Look for other usages of this privilege to ensure consistent implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'AuthorizationPrivilege.COMMUNITY_APPLY_ACCEPT'
Length of output: 931
src/common/enums/authorization.privilege.ts (1)
33-33: LGTM! New privilege follows conventions.
The new COMMUNITY_APPLY_ACCEPT privilege is well-placed and follows the established naming patterns. However, please verify the impact on existing switch statements in the codebase.
src/domain/access/application/application.service.lifecycle.ts (1)
63-63: Verify implementation of the new application accept privilege
The new 'hasApplicationAcceptPrivilege' guard needs proper implementation in the authorization service.
Let's verify the implementation:
Also applies to: 75-75
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify the implementation of the guard.
The application accept privilege is properly implemented
The verification shows that:
- The
COMMUNITY_APPLY_ACCEPTprivilege is defined in the authorization enums - The guard
hasApplicationAcceptPrivilegeis implemented in the role set service with proper authorization checks - The authorization policy rule
POLICY_RULE_COMMUNITY_APPROVE_APPLICATIONis defined and used in the application authorization service - The privilege is correctly integrated with the authorization policy service
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for the implementation of application accept privilege
# Check for privilege definition
echo "Checking for privilege definition..."
rg "COMMUNITY_APPLY_ACCEPT" -A 3
# Check for guard implementation
echo "Checking for guard implementation..."
rg "hasApplicationAcceptPrivilege" -A 5
# Check for authorization service updates
echo "Checking for authorization service implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_AuthorizationService {
$$$
hasApplicationAcceptPrivilege($_) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 3864
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for the authorization service class implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_Service {
$$$
isAccessGranted($_) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Check for any authorization policy rules related to application accept
rg "POLICY_RULE.*APPROV.*APPLICATION" -A 3
Length of output: 1173
src/domain/access/application/application.service.authorization.ts (2)
9-10: LGTM: Imports follow NestJS conventions
The new imports are properly structured and follow NestJS best practices.
29-31: LGTM: Authorization flow is properly structured
The new privilege rules are correctly integrated into the authorization flow, maintaining proper sequencing of policy application.
Let's verify the authorization flow implementation across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Authorization flow implementation is consistent across services
The verification confirms that appendPrivilegeAuthorizationRules is consistently used across multiple services in the codebase, following the same pattern of extending authorization policies with privilege rules. The implementation in the application service aligns with this established pattern.
Key findings:
- The method is used in 14 different service files
- All implementations follow the same pattern of passing authorization and privilege rules
- The base implementation is properly defined in
authorization.policy.service.ts - The change maintains consistency with other services like
role.set.service.authorization.tsthat also append specific privileges
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent authorization flow implementation
# Look for similar patterns of authorization policy application
# Search for other services that might need similar privilege rules
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
applyAuthorizationPolicy($_, $_) {
$$$
}
}'
# Check for consistent usage of appendPrivilegeAuthorizationRules
rg -A 3 "appendPrivilegeAuthorizationRules"
Length of output: 6013
src/domain/access/role-set/role.set.resolver.mutations.ts (1)
696-700:
Design issue with guard triggers needs attention
The TODO comment indicates a temporary fix for guards not being triggered during transitions. This could lead to security vulnerabilities if the authorization checks are bypassed.
Let's verify other places where similar guard trigger issues might exist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores