AuthenticationType enum added and resolver added to User #4589
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new enumeration Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant UserResolver
participant AuthenticationService
participant AgentInfo
User->>UserResolver: Request user authentication method
UserResolver->>AuthenticationService: Retrieve agent info
AuthenticationService->>AgentInfo: Get authentication type
AgentInfo-->>AuthenticationService: Return authenticationType
AuthenticationService-->>UserResolver: Return authenticationType
UserResolver-->>User: Provide authentication method
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
src/common/enums/authentication.type.ts (2)
3-8: LGTM! Consider adding JSDoc comments for better documentation.The
AuthenticationTypeenum is well-structured and covers common authentication methods. The use of lowercase string values is a good practice for consistency.Consider adding JSDoc comments to the enum for better documentation:
/** * Represents the types of authentication methods available in the system. */ export enum AuthenticationType { /** Authentication via LinkedIn */ LINKEDIN = 'linkedin', /** Authentication via Microsoft */ MICROSOFT = 'microsoft', /** Authentication via Email */ EMAIL = 'email', /** Unknown or unspecified authentication method */ UNKNOWN = 'unknown', }
10-12: LGTM! Consider adding a description for improved GraphQL schema documentation.The enum is correctly registered with GraphQL using
registerEnumType. This allows it to be used in GraphQL schemas and queries.Consider adding a description to improve the GraphQL schema documentation:
registerEnumType(AuthenticationType, { name: 'AuthenticationType', description: 'The types of authentication methods supported by the system', });src/core/authentication.agent.info/agent.info.ts (1)
16-16: LGTM: New property enhances type safety. Consider adding a default value for consistency.The
authenticationTypeproperty is correctly implemented as an optional property with the appropriate type. This addition aligns well with the PR objectives to enhance type safety and clarity of authentication methods.For consistency with other properties in the class, consider adding a default value:
authenticationType?: AuthenticationType = undefined;This maintains the optional nature of the property while explicitly stating its default state.
src/core/authentication/ory.default.identity.schema.ts (1)
31-43: Improved array formatting and newOryTraitsinterfaceThe changes in this segment are beneficial:
- The addition of a trailing comma in the
verifiable_addressesarray improves consistency.- The new
OryTraitsinterface properly defines the structure for user traits, enhancing type safety and code clarity.These changes adhere to TypeScript best practices and improve the overall code quality.
Consider adding JSDoc comments to the
OryTraitsinterface and its properties for better documentation. For example:/** * Represents the traits of an Ory identity. */ export interface OryTraits { /** Indicates whether the user has accepted the terms. */ accepted_terms: boolean; /** URL of the user's profile picture. */ picture: string; /** User's email address. */ email: string; /** User's name. */ name: { /** User's first name. */ first: string; /** User's last name. */ last: string; }; }src/domain/community/user/user.resolver.fields.ts (1)
249-260: LGTM with a minor suggestion: authenticationMethod resolverThe new
authenticationMethodresolver is well-implemented and follows the existing patterns in the class. It correctly handles the case whereauthenticationTypemight be undefined.However, consider the following suggestion:
- The method doesn't use the
@Parent()parameter, which is unusual for a field resolver. If the authentication method is specific to each user, you might want to use the parent user object instead of or in addition to theCurrentUser().Consider modifying the method signature to include the parent user:
authenticationMethod( @Parent() user: User, @CurrentUser() agentInfo: AgentInfo ): AuthenticationType { // Use user.id to fetch the specific user's authentication type if needed return agentInfo.authenticationType ?? AuthenticationType.UNKNOWN; }This change would make the resolver consistent with other field resolvers in the class and potentially more flexible for future changes.
src/core/authentication/authentication.service.ts (1)
124-133: Use a More Appropriate Exception for Missing EmailIn the
validateEmailmethod, throwing aNotSupportedExceptionwhen the email is missing may not accurately represent the error condition. Consider using a more suitable exception likeBadRequestExceptionor creating a custom exception to indicate that a required field is missing.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- src/common/enums/authentication.type.ts (1 hunks)
- src/core/authentication.agent.info/agent.info.ts (2 hunks)
- src/core/authentication/authentication.service.ts (4 hunks)
- src/core/authentication/ory.default.identity.schema.ts (2 hunks)
- src/domain/community/user/user.resolver.fields.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (5)
src/common/enums/authentication.type.ts (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.src/core/authentication.agent.info/agent.info.ts (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.src/core/authentication/authentication.service.ts (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.src/core/authentication/ory.default.identity.schema.ts (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.src/domain/community/user/user.resolver.fields.ts (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/core/authentication.agent.info/agent.info.ts (1)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement is correct and necessary.The import of
AuthenticationTypefrom '@common/enums/authentication.type' is properly structured and essential for the new property added to theAgentInfoclass.src/core/authentication/ory.default.identity.schema.ts (2)
13-13: Improved array formattingThe addition of a trailing comma in the
recovery_addressesarray is a good practice. It enhances code consistency and makes future additions to the array easier.
19-19: Improved code organization withOryTraitsinterfaceThe refactoring of the
traitsproperty to use theOryTraitsinterface is a significant improvement. This change enhances code organization, maintainability, and clarity by separating the traits into a distinct interface. It also adheres to TypeScript best practices for handling complex object structures.src/domain/community/user/user.resolver.fields.ts (2)
35-35: LGTM: Import statement for AuthenticationTypeThe import statement for
AuthenticationTypeis correctly placed and follows the project's import conventions.
35-35: Summary: AuthenticationType enum and resolver added successfullyThe changes successfully introduce the
AuthenticationTypeenum and add a new resolver for the authentication method. The implementation follows NestJS and GraphQL best practices, integrating well with the existingUserResolverFieldsclass.Key points:
- The
AuthenticationTypeenum is correctly imported.- The new
authenticationMethodresolver is properly decorated and implemented.- The changes align with the PR objectives and enhance the User entity with authentication information.
Overall, these changes improve the type safety and clarity of authentication methods within the codebase, as intended by the PR.
Also applies to: 249-260
| // Helper to map authentication type from session | ||
| private mapAuthenticationType(session?: Session): AuthenticationType { | ||
| const authenticationMethod = session?.authentication_methods?.[0]; | ||
| const provider = authenticationMethod?.provider; | ||
| const method = authenticationMethod?.method; | ||
|
|
||
| if (provider === 'microsoft') return AuthenticationType.MICROSOFT; | ||
| if (provider === 'linkedin') return AuthenticationType.LINKEDIN; | ||
| if (method === 'password') return AuthenticationType.EMAIL; | ||
|
|
||
| return AuthenticationType.UNKNOWN; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Handle Multiple Authentication Methods in mapAuthenticationType
The mapAuthenticationType method currently checks only the first authentication method in the session. If users can have multiple authentication methods, consider iterating over all methods to accurately determine the user's authentication type.
Here's how you might modify the method:
private mapAuthenticationType(session?: Session): AuthenticationType {
- const authenticationMethod = session?.authentication_methods?.[0];
- const provider = authenticationMethod?.provider;
- const method = authenticationMethod?.method;
+ const authenticationMethods = session?.authentication_methods || [];
+
+ for (const authMethod of authenticationMethods) {
+ const provider = authMethod.provider;
+ const method = authMethod.method;
+
+ if (provider === 'microsoft') return AuthenticationType.MICROSOFT;
+ if (provider === 'linkedin') return AuthenticationType.LINKEDIN;
+ if (method === 'password') return AuthenticationType.EMAIL;
+ }
return AuthenticationType.UNKNOWN;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // Helper to map authentication type from session | |
| private mapAuthenticationType(session?: Session): AuthenticationType { | |
| const authenticationMethod = session?.authentication_methods?.[0]; | |
| const provider = authenticationMethod?.provider; | |
| const method = authenticationMethod?.method; | |
| if (provider === 'microsoft') return AuthenticationType.MICROSOFT; | |
| if (provider === 'linkedin') return AuthenticationType.LINKEDIN; | |
| if (method === 'password') return AuthenticationType.EMAIL; | |
| return AuthenticationType.UNKNOWN; | |
| } | |
| // Helper to map authentication type from session | |
| private mapAuthenticationType(session?: Session): AuthenticationType { | |
| const authenticationMethods = session?.authentication_methods || []; | |
| for (const authMethod of authenticationMethods) { | |
| const provider = authMethod.provider; | |
| const method = authMethod.method; | |
| if (provider === 'microsoft') return AuthenticationType.MICROSOFT; | |
| if (provider === 'linkedin') return AuthenticationType.LINKEDIN; | |
| if (method === 'password') return AuthenticationType.EMAIL; | |
| } | |
| return AuthenticationType.UNKNOWN; | |
| } |
| // Helper to add verified credentials if SSI is enabled | ||
| private async addVerifiedCredentialsIfEnabled( | ||
| agentInfo: AgentInfo, | ||
| agentID: string | ||
| ): Promise<void> { | ||
| const ssiEnabled = this.configService.get('ssi.enabled', { infer: true }); | ||
|
|
||
| if (ssiEnabled) { | ||
| const VCs = await this.agentService.getVerifiedCredentials( | ||
| agentInfoMetadata.agentID | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| agentInfo.verifiedCredentials = VCs; | ||
| const verifiedCredentials = | ||
| await this.agentService.getVerifiedCredentials(agentID); | ||
| agentInfo.verifiedCredentials = verifiedCredentials; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add Error Handling in addVerifiedCredentialsIfEnabled
In the addVerifiedCredentialsIfEnabled method, the call to agentService.getVerifiedCredentials(agentID) is not enclosed in a try-catch block. If this call fails, it may lead to an unhandled exception.
Consider wrapping the asynchronous call in a try-catch block to handle potential errors gracefully:
private async addVerifiedCredentialsIfEnabled(
agentInfo: AgentInfo,
agentID: string
): Promise<void> {
const ssiEnabled = this.configService.get('ssi.enabled', { infer: true });
if (ssiEnabled) {
+ try {
const verifiedCredentials =
await this.agentService.getVerifiedCredentials(agentID);
agentInfo.verifiedCredentials = verifiedCredentials;
+ } catch (error) {
+ this.logger.error?.(
+ `Failed to retrieve verified credentials for agentID ${agentID}: ${error}`,
+ LogContext.AUTH
+ );
+ // Optionally, handle the error or rethrow it
+ }
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // Helper to add verified credentials if SSI is enabled | |
| private async addVerifiedCredentialsIfEnabled( | |
| agentInfo: AgentInfo, | |
| agentID: string | |
| ): Promise<void> { | |
| const ssiEnabled = this.configService.get('ssi.enabled', { infer: true }); | |
| if (ssiEnabled) { | |
| const VCs = await this.agentService.getVerifiedCredentials( | |
| agentInfoMetadata.agentID | |
| ); | |
| agentInfo.verifiedCredentials = VCs; | |
| const verifiedCredentials = | |
| await this.agentService.getVerifiedCredentials(agentID); | |
| agentInfo.verifiedCredentials = verifiedCredentials; | |
| // Helper to add verified credentials if SSI is enabled | |
| private async addVerifiedCredentialsIfEnabled( | |
| agentInfo: AgentInfo, | |
| agentID: string | |
| ): Promise<void> { | |
| const ssiEnabled = this.configService.get('ssi.enabled', { infer: true }); | |
| if (ssiEnabled) { | |
| try { | |
| const verifiedCredentials = | |
| await this.agentService.getVerifiedCredentials(agentID); | |
| agentInfo.verifiedCredentials = verifiedCredentials; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| this.logger.error?.( | |
| `Failed to retrieve verified credentials for agentID ${agentID}: ${error}`, | |
| LogContext.AUTH | |
| ); | |
| // Optionally, handle the error or rethrow it | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Logic is working when applied to the current user. But not for retrieving the authentication method for another user - which is the primary driver i.e. I want to be able to get the authentication method used by all Alkemio org associates.
Right now if I run a query across all users it returns the auth method for the current user ([email protected]) for every user:
But the neil user in the above is LinkedIn.
This almost by definition cannot be anchored on the current session. It has to either a) be stored with the user profile or b) retrieve dynamically from Kratos. Latter is clearly better - and immediately covers all existing users.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/domain/community/user/user.resolver.fields.ts (1)
249-260: LGTM with suggestions: authenticationMethod field resolverThe new field resolver for
authenticationMethodis well-implemented:
- Correct use of decorators for GraphQL and authorization.
- Good separation of concerns by delegating to the userService.
- Appropriate use of async/await for potentially time-consuming operations.
Suggestions for improvement:
- Consider adding error handling for cases where
getAuthenticationTypeByEmailmight fail.- Add comments explaining the purpose of this resolver and any potential side effects.
Example:
@AuthorizationAgentPrivilege(AuthorizationPrivilege.READ) @ResolveField('authenticationMethod', () => AuthenticationType, { nullable: true, description: 'The Authentication Method used for this User. One of email, linkedin, microsoft, or unknown', }) @UseGuards(GraphqlGuard) async authenticationMethod( @Parent() user: IUser ): Promise<AuthenticationType> { try { // Retrieve the authentication type for the user based on their email // This method is expected to return a valid AuthenticationType or throw an error return await this.userService.getAuthenticationTypeByEmail(user.email); } catch (error) { // Log the error and return a default value or rethrow based on your error handling strategy this.logger.error(`Failed to get authentication type for user ${user.id}: ${error.message}`); throw new Error('Unable to determine authentication method'); } }src/core/authentication/authentication.service.ts (2)
162-166: SimplifygetCachedAgentInfoby Removing RedundantawaitIn an
asyncfunction, usingreturn awaitis redundant because the function will automatically return a promise. You can simplify thegetCachedAgentInfomethod by removing the unnecessaryawait.Apply this diff to simplify the method:
private async getCachedAgentInfo( email: string ): Promise<AgentInfo | undefined> { - return await this.agentCacheService.getAgentInfoFromCache(email); + return this.agentCacheService.getAgentInfoFromCache(email); }
Line range hint
175-195: Ensure Accurate Email Verification Status inbuildBasicAgentInfoThe
isEmailVerifiedflag is determined based on the first occurrence of a verifiable address withvia === 'email'. However, users might have multiple verifiable addresses, and the email might not be the first in the list. Consider modifying the logic to accurately reflect the email verification status by searching for the specific email address.Apply this diff to improve email verification checking:
const isEmailVerified = - oryIdentity.verifiable_addresses.find(x => x.via === 'email')?.verified ?? false; + oryIdentity.verifiable_addresses.find( + x => x.value === oryTraits.email && x.via === 'email' + )?.verified ?? false;src/domain/community/user/user.service.ts (1)
179-196: Consider handling additional OIDC providers and adding logging.The
mapAuthenticationTypemethod currently checks for identifiers starting with'microsoft'and'linkedin'. If other OIDC providers are used, they will result inAuthenticationType.UNKNOWN. Consider extending the logic to handle additional providers or adding logging to track unrecognized identifiers for easier troubleshooting.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- src/core/authentication.agent.info/agent.info.ts (0 hunks)
- src/core/authentication/authentication.service.ts (4 hunks)
- src/domain/community/user/user.resolver.fields.ts (2 hunks)
- src/domain/community/user/user.service.ts (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/core/authentication.agent.info/agent.info.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
src/core/authentication/authentication.service.ts (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.src/domain/community/user/user.resolver.fields.ts (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.src/domain/community/user/user.service.ts (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/domain/community/user/user.resolver.fields.ts (1)
35-35: LGTM: Import statement for AuthenticationTypeThe import statement for
AuthenticationTypeis correctly placed and necessary for the new field resolver. Good job on using a common enum for authentication types, which promotes reusability across the codebase.src/domain/community/user/user.service.ts (4)
66-69: Imports look good.The necessary imports for Ory Kratos client and configuration are correctly added.
74-74: Initialization ofkratosIdentityClientis appropriate.The private member
kratosIdentityClientis correctly declared and typed.
87-87: EnsureConfigServiceis properly injected.The
ConfigServiceis added as a dependency in the constructor. Confirm that it is provided in the module to enable dependency injection.To verify, ensure that the module providing
UserServicealso importsConfigModuleand includesConfigServicein its providers.
108-120: Method implementation is correct.The
getAuthenticationTypeByEmailmethod correctly retrieves the authentication type for the given email.
| /** | ||
| * Creates and returns an `AgentInfo` object based on the provided Ory identity and session. | ||
| * | ||
| * @param oryIdentity - Optional Ory identity schema containing user traits. | ||
| * @param session - Optional session information. | ||
| * @returns A promise that resolves to an `AgentInfo` object. | ||
| * | ||
| * This method performs the following steps: | ||
| * 1. Validates the provided Ory identity. | ||
| * 2. Checks for cached agent information based on the email from the Ory identity. | ||
| * 3. Builds basic agent information if no cached information is found. | ||
| * 4. Maps the authentication type from the session. | ||
| * 5. Retrieves additional metadata for the agent. | ||
| * 6. Populates the agent information with the retrieved metadata. | ||
| * 7. Adds verified credentials if enabled. | ||
| * 8. Caches the agent information. | ||
| */ | ||
| async createAgentInfo( | ||
| oryIdentity?: OryDefaultIdentitySchema, | ||
| session?: Session | ||
| ): Promise<AgentInfo> { | ||
| const agentInfo = new AgentInfo(); | ||
| if (!oryIdentity) { | ||
| return agentInfo; | ||
| } | ||
| if (!oryIdentity) return new AgentInfo(); | ||
|
|
||
| const oryTraits = this.validateEmail(oryIdentity); | ||
|
|
||
| const cachedAgentInfo = await this.getCachedAgentInfo(oryTraits.email); | ||
| if (cachedAgentInfo) return cachedAgentInfo; | ||
|
|
||
| const agentInfo = this.buildBasicAgentInfo(oryIdentity, session); | ||
|
|
||
| const agentInfoMetadata = await this.getAgentInfoMetadata(agentInfo.email); | ||
| if (!agentInfoMetadata) return agentInfo; | ||
|
|
||
| this.populateAgentInfoWithMetadata(agentInfo, agentInfoMetadata); | ||
| await this.addVerifiedCredentialsIfEnabled( | ||
| agentInfo, | ||
| agentInfoMetadata.agentID | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| await this.agentCacheService.setAgentInfoCache(agentInfo); | ||
| return agentInfo; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add Error Handling for External Service Calls in createAgentInfo
The createAgentInfo method makes several external service calls such as getCachedAgentInfo, setAgentInfoCache, and addVerifiedCredentialsIfEnabled without wrapping them in try-catch blocks. If any of these calls fail, it could result in unhandled exceptions and disrupt the authentication flow. To enhance the robustness of the application, consider adding error handling around these calls to gracefully manage potential failures.
Apply this diff to add error handling:
async createAgentInfo(
oryIdentity?: OryDefaultIdentitySchema,
session?: Session
): Promise<AgentInfo> {
if (!oryIdentity) return new AgentInfo();
const oryTraits = this.validateEmail(oryIdentity);
- const cachedAgentInfo = await this.getCachedAgentInfo(oryTraits.email);
- if (cachedAgentInfo) return cachedAgentInfo;
+ let cachedAgentInfo: AgentInfo | undefined;
+ try {
+ cachedAgentInfo = await this.getCachedAgentInfo(oryTraits.email);
+ if (cachedAgentInfo) return cachedAgentInfo;
+ } catch (error) {
+ this.logger.error?.(
+ `Error retrieving cached agent info for ${oryTraits.email}: ${error}`,
+ LogContext.AUTH
+ );
+ }
- const agentInfo = this.buildBasicAgentInfo(oryIdentity, session);
+ let agentInfo: AgentInfo;
+ try {
+ agentInfo = this.buildBasicAgentInfo(oryIdentity, session);
+ } catch (error) {
+ this.logger.error?.(
+ `Error building basic agent info for ${oryTraits.email}: ${error}`,
+ LogContext.AUTH
+ );
+ return new AgentInfo();
+ }
const agentInfoMetadata = await this.getAgentInfoMetadata(agentInfo.email);
if (!agentInfoMetadata) return agentInfo;
this.populateAgentInfoWithMetadata(agentInfo, agentInfoMetadata);
await this.addVerifiedCredentialsIfEnabled(
agentInfo,
agentInfoMetadata.agentID
);
+ try {
+ await this.agentCacheService.setAgentInfoCache(agentInfo);
+ } catch (error) {
+ this.logger.error?.(
+ `Error caching agent info for ${agentInfo.email}: ${error}`,
+ LogContext.AUTH
+ );
+ }
return agentInfo;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| /** | |
| * Creates and returns an `AgentInfo` object based on the provided Ory identity and session. | |
| * | |
| * @param oryIdentity - Optional Ory identity schema containing user traits. | |
| * @param session - Optional session information. | |
| * @returns A promise that resolves to an `AgentInfo` object. | |
| * | |
| * This method performs the following steps: | |
| * 1. Validates the provided Ory identity. | |
| * 2. Checks for cached agent information based on the email from the Ory identity. | |
| * 3. Builds basic agent information if no cached information is found. | |
| * 4. Maps the authentication type from the session. | |
| * 5. Retrieves additional metadata for the agent. | |
| * 6. Populates the agent information with the retrieved metadata. | |
| * 7. Adds verified credentials if enabled. | |
| * 8. Caches the agent information. | |
| */ | |
| async createAgentInfo( | |
| oryIdentity?: OryDefaultIdentitySchema, | |
| session?: Session | |
| ): Promise<AgentInfo> { | |
| const agentInfo = new AgentInfo(); | |
| if (!oryIdentity) { | |
| return agentInfo; | |
| } | |
| if (!oryIdentity) return new AgentInfo(); | |
| const oryTraits = this.validateEmail(oryIdentity); | |
| const cachedAgentInfo = await this.getCachedAgentInfo(oryTraits.email); | |
| if (cachedAgentInfo) return cachedAgentInfo; | |
| const agentInfo = this.buildBasicAgentInfo(oryIdentity, session); | |
| const agentInfoMetadata = await this.getAgentInfoMetadata(agentInfo.email); | |
| if (!agentInfoMetadata) return agentInfo; | |
| this.populateAgentInfoWithMetadata(agentInfo, agentInfoMetadata); | |
| await this.addVerifiedCredentialsIfEnabled( | |
| agentInfo, | |
| agentInfoMetadata.agentID | |
| ); | |
| await this.agentCacheService.setAgentInfoCache(agentInfo); | |
| return agentInfo; | |
| } | |
| /** | |
| * Creates and returns an `AgentInfo` object based on the provided Ory identity and session. | |
| * | |
| * @param oryIdentity - Optional Ory identity schema containing user traits. | |
| * @param session - Optional session information. | |
| * @returns A promise that resolves to an `AgentInfo` object. | |
| * | |
| * This method performs the following steps: | |
| * 1. Validates the provided Ory identity. | |
| * 2. Checks for cached agent information based on the email from the Ory identity. | |
| * 3. Builds basic agent information if no cached information is found. | |
| * 4. Maps the authentication type from the session. | |
| * 5. Retrieves additional metadata for the agent. | |
| * 6. Populates the agent information with the retrieved metadata. | |
| * 7. Adds verified credentials if enabled. | |
| * 8. Caches the agent information. | |
| */ | |
| async createAgentInfo( | |
| oryIdentity?: OryDefaultIdentitySchema, | |
| session?: Session | |
| ): Promise<AgentInfo> { | |
| if (!oryIdentity) return new AgentInfo(); | |
| const oryTraits = this.validateEmail(oryIdentity); | |
| let cachedAgentInfo: AgentInfo | undefined; | |
| try { | |
| cachedAgentInfo = await this.getCachedAgentInfo(oryTraits.email); | |
| if (cachedAgentInfo) return cachedAgentInfo; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| this.logger.error?.( | |
| `Error retrieving cached agent info for ${oryTraits.email}: ${error}`, | |
| LogContext.AUTH | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| let agentInfo: AgentInfo; | |
| try { | |
| agentInfo = this.buildBasicAgentInfo(oryIdentity, session); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| this.logger.error?.( | |
| `Error building basic agent info for ${oryTraits.email}: ${error}`, | |
| LogContext.AUTH | |
| ); | |
| return new AgentInfo(); | |
| } | |
| const agentInfoMetadata = await this.getAgentInfoMetadata(agentInfo.email); | |
| if (!agentInfoMetadata) return agentInfo; | |
| this.populateAgentInfoWithMetadata(agentInfo, agentInfoMetadata); | |
| await this.addVerifiedCredentialsIfEnabled( | |
| agentInfo, | |
| agentInfoMetadata.agentID | |
| ); | |
| try { | |
| await this.agentCacheService.setAgentInfoCache(agentInfo); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| this.logger.error?.( | |
| `Error caching agent info for ${agentInfo.email}: ${error}`, | |
| LogContext.AUTH | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| return agentInfo; | |
| } |
| ) { | ||
| const { kratos_admin_base_url_server } = this.configService.get( | ||
| 'identity.authentication.providers.ory', | ||
| { | ||
| infer: true, | ||
| } | ||
| ); | ||
| const kratosAdminUrlServer = kratos_admin_base_url_server; | ||
| this.kratosIdentityClient = new IdentityApi( | ||
| new Configuration({ | ||
| basePath: kratosAdminUrlServer, | ||
| }) | ||
| ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for configuration retrieval.
The code retrieves kratos_admin_base_url_server from the configuration but does not handle the case where this value might be undefined. Consider adding error handling to manage scenarios where the configuration value is missing, which could prevent runtime errors.
Apply this diff to include error handling:
) {
const { kratos_admin_base_url_server } = this.configService.get(
'identity.authentication.providers.ory',
{
infer: true,
}
);
+ if (!kratos_admin_base_url_server) {
+ throw new Error('kratos_admin_base_url_server is not defined in configuration.');
+ }
const kratosAdminUrlServer = kratos_admin_base_url_server;
this.kratosIdentityClient = new IdentityApi(
new Configuration({
basePath: kratosAdminUrlServer,
})
);
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| ) { | |
| const { kratos_admin_base_url_server } = this.configService.get( | |
| 'identity.authentication.providers.ory', | |
| { | |
| infer: true, | |
| } | |
| ); | |
| const kratosAdminUrlServer = kratos_admin_base_url_server; | |
| this.kratosIdentityClient = new IdentityApi( | |
| new Configuration({ | |
| basePath: kratosAdminUrlServer, | |
| }) | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| ) { | |
| const { kratos_admin_base_url_server } = this.configService.get( | |
| 'identity.authentication.providers.ory', | |
| { | |
| infer: true, | |
| } | |
| ); | |
| if (!kratos_admin_base_url_server) { | |
| throw new Error('kratos_admin_base_url_server is not defined in configuration.'); | |
| } | |
| const kratosAdminUrlServer = kratos_admin_base_url_server; | |
| this.kratosIdentityClient = new IdentityApi( | |
| new Configuration({ | |
| basePath: kratosAdminUrlServer, | |
| }) | |
| ); | |
| } |
| const { data: identity } = await this.kratosIdentityClient.listIdentities({ | ||
| credentialsIdentifier: email, | ||
| includeCredential: ['password', 'oidc'], | ||
| }); | ||
| if (!identity) { | ||
| this.logger.warn( | ||
| `Identity with email ${email} not found.`, | ||
| LogContext.USER | ||
| ); | ||
| return undefined; | ||
| } | ||
| if (identity.length === 0) { | ||
| this.logger.warn( | ||
| `Identity with email ${email} not found.`, | ||
| LogContext.USER | ||
| ); | ||
| return undefined; | ||
| } | ||
| return identity[0]; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Wrap API call in try-catch and correct variable naming.
The call to this.kratosIdentityClient.listIdentities() may throw an exception if the request fails. Additionally, the variable identity is used to represent an array of identities, which may cause confusion.
- Use try-catch to handle potential exceptions.
- Rename
identitytoidentitiesfor clarity.
Apply this diff to include error handling and correct variable naming:
private async getIdentityByEmail(
email: string
): Promise<Identity | undefined> {
+ try {
- const { data: identity } = await this.kratosIdentityClient.listIdentities({
+ const { data: identities } = await this.kratosIdentityClient.listIdentities({
credentialsIdentifier: email,
includeCredential: ['password', 'oidc'],
});
- if (!identity) {
+ if (!identities || identities.length === 0) {
this.logger.warn(
`Identity with email ${email} not found.`,
LogContext.USER
);
return undefined;
}
- if (identity.length === 0) {
- this.logger.warn(
- `Identity with email ${email} not found.`,
- LogContext.USER
- );
- return undefined;
- }
- return identity[0];
+ return identities[0];
+ } catch (error) {
+ this.logger.error(`Error retrieving identity for email ${email}: ${error}`, LogContext.USER);
+ return undefined;
+ }
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const { data: identity } = await this.kratosIdentityClient.listIdentities({ | |
| credentialsIdentifier: email, | |
| includeCredential: ['password', 'oidc'], | |
| }); | |
| if (!identity) { | |
| this.logger.warn( | |
| `Identity with email ${email} not found.`, | |
| LogContext.USER | |
| ); | |
| return undefined; | |
| } | |
| if (identity.length === 0) { | |
| this.logger.warn( | |
| `Identity with email ${email} not found.`, | |
| LogContext.USER | |
| ); | |
| return undefined; | |
| } | |
| return identity[0]; | |
| } | |
| try { | |
| const { data: identities } = await this.kratosIdentityClient.listIdentities({ | |
| credentialsIdentifier: email, | |
| includeCredential: ['password', 'oidc'], | |
| }); | |
| if (!identities || identities.length === 0) { | |
| this.logger.warn( | |
| `Identity with email ${email} not found.`, | |
| LogContext.USER | |
| ); | |
| return undefined; | |
| } | |
| return identities[0]; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| this.logger.error(`Error retrieving identity for email ${email}: ${error}`, LogContext.USER); | |
| return undefined; | |
| } | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/domain/community/user/user.service.spec.ts (3)
22-28: LGTM: TestingModule setup improved with custom mocker.The custom mocker function effectively handles the ConfigService mock while maintaining the default behavior for other dependencies. This approach enhances the test's ability to control the ConfigService behavior.
Consider extracting the custom mocker logic into a separate function for improved readability:
const customMocker = (token) => { if (token === ConfigService) { return ConfigServiceMock; } return defaultMockerFactory(token); }; // Then in the TestingModule setup .useMocker(customMocker)
39-43: ConfigServiceMock implementation is correct but could be better placed.The ConfigServiceMock correctly mocks the 'get' method of the ConfigService, which is good for isolating the test from the actual configuration.
Consider moving the ConfigServiceMock definition to the top of the file, just after the imports. This would improve readability and follow the convention of declaring mocks before they are used. For example:
import { ConfigService } from '@nestjs/config'; const ConfigServiceMock = { get: jest.fn().mockReturnValue({ kratos_admin_base_url_server: 'mockUrl', }), }; describe('UserService', () => { // ... rest of the test suite });
Insufficient Test Coverage Detected
The test suite for
UserServicecurrently includes only one test case with a single expectation. To ensure comprehensive coverage and validate all functionalities of theUserService, additional test cases should be implemented. Consider adding tests that cover:
- Specific methods within
UserService.- Error handling scenarios.
- Edge cases and boundary conditions.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-43: Overall improvements to the test suite, but more test cases needed.The changes to this test file enhance its ability to mock the ConfigService, which is a good practice for isolating the UserService in tests. The use of custom mockers and the TestingModule setup follow NestJS testing best practices.
However, the test suite currently only checks if the service is defined. To ensure proper coverage and functionality, consider adding more test cases. Here's a script to verify the current test coverage:
Would you like assistance in generating additional test cases for the UserService? This could include tests for specific methods, error handling, and edge cases.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check test coverage for UserService # Test: Count the number of test cases test_count=$(rg "it\(" src/domain/community/user/user.service.spec.ts | wc -l) echo "Number of test cases found: $test_count" # Test: Check for common test patterns rg "expect\(" src/domain/community/user/user.service.spec.ts # Note: Low number of test cases or lack of expect statements may indicate insufficient coverageLength of output: 250
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/domain/community/user/user.service.spec.ts (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/domain/community/user/user.service.spec.ts (2)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Pattern
src/**/*.spec.ts: Review the unit tests, ensuring proper NestJS testing techniques (using TestingModule, mocks, etc.). Check for completeness and coverage.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/domain/community/user/user.service.spec.ts (1)
8-8: LGTM: Import statement added correctly.The import of
ConfigServicefrom@nestjs/configis appropriate for the changes made in this file.
…to delete users later; made field protected
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/services/adapters/kratos-adapter/kratos.adapter.module.ts (1)
5-10: Module structure adheres to NestJS best practices.The
KratosAdapterModuleis well-structured, following NestJS conventions:
- Proper use of the
@Moduledecorator- Correct import of
KonfigModule- Appropriate provision and export of
KratosAdapterFor consistency with NestJS naming conventions, consider renaming the file to
kratos-adapter.module.ts.src/common/enums/logging.context.ts (1)
74-74: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for the new entry.The addition of
KRATOS = 'kratos'to theLogContextenum is consistent with the existing pattern and naming conventions. This change aligns with the PR objectives of introducing Kratos-related functionality.Consider adding a brief comment above the new entry to explain its purpose or provide context, similar to:
// Logging context for Kratos authentication-related events KRATOS = 'kratos',This would enhance code readability and maintainability, especially for developers who might not be familiar with Kratos.
src/domain/community/user/user.service.ts (1)
92-104: Add error handling to the new method.The new
getAuthenticationTypeByEmailmethod is well-implemented and documented. However, consider adding error handling for potential exceptions that might be thrown by thekratosAdaptermethods.Consider wrapping the adapter calls in a try-catch block:
public async getAuthenticationTypeByEmail( email: string ): Promise<AuthenticationType> { - const identity = await this.kratosAdapter.getIdentityByEmail(email); - if (!identity) return AuthenticationType.UNKNOWN; - return this.kratosAdapter.mapAuthenticationType(identity); + try { + const identity = await this.kratosAdapter.getIdentityByEmail(email); + if (!identity) return AuthenticationType.UNKNOWN; + return this.kratosAdapter.mapAuthenticationType(identity); + } catch (error) { + this.logger.error(`Error getting authentication type for email ${email}: ${error}`, LogContext.USER); + return AuthenticationType.UNKNOWN; + } }This change will ensure that any errors are logged and a default authentication type is returned in case of exceptions.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- src/common/enums/logging.context.ts (1 hunks)
- src/domain/community/user/user.module.ts (2 hunks)
- src/domain/community/user/user.resolver.fields.ts (3 hunks)
- src/domain/community/user/user.service.ts (2 hunks)
- src/services/adapters/kratos-adapter/kratos.adapter.module.ts (1 hunks)
- src/services/adapters/kratos-adapter/kratos.adapter.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/domain/community/user/user.resolver.fields.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (5)
src/common/enums/logging.context.ts (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.src/domain/community/user/user.module.ts (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.src/domain/community/user/user.service.ts (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.src/services/adapters/kratos-adapter/kratos.adapter.module.ts (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.src/services/adapters/kratos-adapter/kratos.adapter.ts (1)
Pattern
src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
🔇 Additional comments (8)
src/services/adapters/kratos-adapter/kratos.adapter.module.ts (1)
1-3: Imports are correctly structured and follow NestJS conventions.The imports are well-organized, using appropriate paths for both external and local modules. This adheres to NestJS best practices.
src/domain/community/user/user.module.ts (4)
33-33: LGTM: KratosAdapterModule import addedThe addition of the KratosAdapterModule import is consistent with the PR objectives and follows NestJS conventions for integrating external services.
55-55: LGTM: KratosAdapterModule added to importsThe addition of KratosAdapterModule to the imports array is consistent with the new import statement and follows NestJS best practices for module composition.
Line range hint
1-72: Summary: KratosAdapterModule integration looks goodThe changes to the UserModule are minimal and focused, adding the KratosAdapterModule to enhance authentication-related functionality. The overall structure of the module remains intact and continues to follow NestJS best practices. There are no apparent side effects or inconsistencies introduced by these changes.
However, please ensure that the integration of KratosAdapterModule doesn't introduce any circular dependencies or affect the existing functionality of the UserModule.
To verify the impact of KratosAdapterModule integration, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
To address the issues encountered with the previous shell scripts, please run the following updated scripts to verify potential circular dependencies and the usage of
KratosAdapterModulein theUserModule:
Verification Successful: No Circular Dependencies Detected
The integration of
KratosAdapterModuleinto theUserModulehas been successfully verified. No circular dependencies were found, andKratosAdapterModuleis correctly imported and utilized within theUserModule. There are no adverse impacts on the existing functionality.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential circular dependencies and KratosAdapterModule usage # Test 1: Check for circular dependencies echo "Checking for potential circular dependencies:" rg --type typescript "from.*user" src/services/adapters/kratos-adapter # Test 2: Check for KratosAdapterModule usage in UserModule echo "Checking for KratosAdapterModule usage in UserModule:" rg --type typescript "KratosAdapter" src/domain/community/userLength of output: 423
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential circular dependencies and KratosAdapterModule usage # Test 1: Check for potential circular dependencies echo "Checking for potential circular dependencies:" rg --type ts "from\s+['\"]@domain/community/user['\"]" src/services/adapters/kratos-adapter # Test 2: Check for KratosAdapterModule usage in UserModule echo "Checking for KratosAdapterModule usage in UserModule:" rg --type ts "KratosAdapter" src/domain/community/userLength of output: 780
Line range hint
36-58: Verify: Status of KonfigModuleThe AI summary mentions the removal of KonfigModule from the imports array, but this change is not visible in the provided code. Could you please confirm if KonfigModule was indeed removed? If so, ensure that its removal doesn't affect any functionality in the UserModule.
To verify the status of KonfigModule, please run the following script:
src/domain/community/user/user.service.ts (2)
66-67: LGTM: New imports added correctly.The new imports for
AuthenticationTypeandKratosAdapterare appropriately placed and relevant to the new functionality being introduced in this file.
84-84: LGTM: Constructor updated with new dependency.The
KratosAdapteris correctly injected as a private dependency in the constructor, following the established pattern and best practices for dependency injection in NestJS.src/services/adapters/kratos-adapter/kratos.adapter.ts (1)
1-86: Code adheres to NestJS and TypeScript best practicesThe implementation is well-structured, with appropriate use of decorators and dependency injection. The code is readable and maintainable.
| const { data: identity } = await this.kratosIdentityClient.listIdentities({ | ||
| credentialsIdentifier: email, | ||
| includeCredential: ['password', 'oidc'], | ||
| }); | ||
| if (!identity || identity.length === 0) { | ||
| this.logger.warn( | ||
| `Identity with email ${email} not found.`, | ||
| LogContext.KRATOS | ||
| ); | ||
| return undefined; | ||
| } | ||
| return identity[0]; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the API usage and variable naming in getIdentityByEmail method
The listIdentities method of the Kratos client does not support the credentialsIdentifier parameter. Instead, use the query parameter to search identities by email. Additionally, since the response data is an array of identities, rename the variable to identities for clarity.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-const { data: identity } = await this.kratosIdentityClient.listIdentities({
- credentialsIdentifier: email,
+const { data: identities } = await this.kratosIdentityClient.listIdentities({
+ query: email,
includeCredential: ['password', 'oidc'],
});
-if (!identity || identity.length === 0) {
+if (!identities || identities.length === 0) {
this.logger.warn(
`Identity with email ${email} not found.`,
LogContext.KRATOS
);
return undefined;
}
-return identity[0];
+return identities[0];📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const { data: identity } = await this.kratosIdentityClient.listIdentities({ | |
| credentialsIdentifier: email, | |
| includeCredential: ['password', 'oidc'], | |
| }); | |
| if (!identity || identity.length === 0) { | |
| this.logger.warn( | |
| `Identity with email ${email} not found.`, | |
| LogContext.KRATOS | |
| ); | |
| return undefined; | |
| } | |
| return identity[0]; | |
| } | |
| const { data: identities } = await this.kratosIdentityClient.listIdentities({ | |
| query: email, | |
| includeCredential: ['password', 'oidc'], | |
| }); | |
| if (!identities || identities.length === 0) { | |
| this.logger.warn( | |
| `Identity with email ${email} not found.`, | |
| LogContext.KRATOS | |
| ); | |
| return undefined; | |
| } | |
| return identities[0]; | |
| } |
AuthenticationTypeunder usercreateAgentInfo- strongly typed, smaller methods, more readableSummary by CodeRabbit
New Features
AuthenticationTypeenum for various authentication methods.KratosAdaptermodule for enhanced identity management integration.Improvements
AgentInfoclass with an optionalauthenticationTypeproperty.AuthenticationServicewith new helper methods for better maintainability.OryDefaultIdentitySchemaby introducing theOryTraitsinterface.These changes enhance user experience by providing clearer authentication options and improving data retrieval related to user authentication methods.