Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

made lookup by nameID to be separate to lookup by UUID #4580

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

techsmyth
Copy link
Member

@techsmyth techsmyth commented Oct 2, 2024

The paths should be logically full separate
Error message should now give more information if it is still happening.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new method to fetch an Innovation Pack by its NameID.
  • Enhancements

    • Improved clarity in method naming and error handling for fetching templates and innovation packs.
    • Updated documentation for resolver methods to better describe functionality.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted error messages to reflect accurate search criteria for templates and innovation packs.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several modifications across three service files. The TemplateService class has a method renamed and its logic refined to focus exclusively on searching by nameID. The InnovationPackService class sees the refactoring of an existing method and the addition of a new method for fetching InnovationPack by nameID. Additionally, the LookupByNameResolverFields class updates method names and descriptions to enhance clarity regarding their functionality. Overall, the changes aim to improve code readability and maintainability without introducing new features.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/domain/template/template/template.service.ts - Renamed method: getTemplateInTemplatesSetOrFailgetTemplateByNameIDInTemplatesSetOrFail
- Parameter name changed: templateIdOrNameIdtemplateNameId
- Updated error message for template not found.
src/library/innovation-pack/innovation.pack.service.ts - Refactored method: getInnovationPackOrFail to simplify logic and removed secondary lookup.
- Added method: getInnovationPackByNameIdOrFail.
src/services/api/lookup-by-name/lookup.by.name.resolver.fields.ts - Renamed method: getInnovationPackOrFailgetInnovationPackByNameIdOrFail
- Renamed method: getTemplateInTemplatesSetOrFailgetTemplateByNameIDInTemplatesSetOrFail
- Updated descriptions and authorization messages for clarity.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant LookupByNameResolverFields
    participant InnovationPackService
    participant TemplateService

    Client->>LookupByNameResolverFields: request innovationPack(nameID)
    LookupByNameResolverFields->>InnovationPackService: getInnovationPackByNameIdOrFail(nameID)
    InnovationPackService-->>LookupByNameResolverFields: return InnovationPack or throw error
    LookupByNameResolverFields-->>Client: return InnovationPack or error message

    Client->>LookupByNameResolverFields: request template(templatesSetID, nameID)
    LookupByNameResolverFields->>TemplateService: getTemplateByNameIDInTemplatesSetOrFail(templatesSetID, nameID)
    TemplateService-->>LookupByNameResolverFields: return Template or throw error
    LookupByNameResolverFields-->>Client: return Template or error message
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@techsmyth techsmyth requested a review from ccanos October 2, 2024 12:34
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/services/api/lookup-by-name/lookup.by.name.resolver.fields.ts (1)

56-60: Improved method naming and error message accuracy

The changes in the template method implementation enhance code clarity and error reporting:

  1. Renaming getTemplateInTemplatesSetOrFail to getTemplateByNameIDInTemplatesSetOrFail explicitly indicates the lookup method, aligning with the PR objective.
  2. Updating the error message from "InnovationPack" to "template" corrects a previous inaccuracy.

These improvements contribute to better code maintainability and more accurate error handling.

Consider further improving the error message by including both the template ID and NameID:

- `lookup template by NameID: ${template.id}`
+ `lookup template by NameID: ${nameID}, ID: ${template.id}`

This change would provide more comprehensive information for debugging purposes.

Also applies to: 66-66

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3bf99f4 and 488e939.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/domain/template/template/template.service.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/library/innovation-pack/innovaton.pack.service.ts (2 hunks)
  • src/services/api/lookup-by-name/lookup.by.name.resolver.fields.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
src/domain/template/template/template.service.ts (1)

Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.

src/library/innovation-pack/innovaton.pack.service.ts (1)

Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.

src/services/api/lookup-by-name/lookup.by.name.resolver.fields.ts (1)

Pattern src/**/*.{ts,js}: Review the TypeScript/JavaScript code for NestJS best practices, dependency injection, module structure, and potential bugs. Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.

🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/services/api/lookup-by-name/lookup.by.name.resolver.fields.ts (2)

34-34: Improved method naming for clarity

The renaming of getInnovationPackOrFail to getInnovationPackByNameIdOrFail enhances code clarity by explicitly stating that the lookup is performed using a NameID. This change aligns well with the PR objective of separating nameID and UUID lookups.


49-49: Enhanced method description

The updated description for the template resolver method now accurately reflects that the lookup uses both a templatesSetId and a template NameID. This improvement in documentation clarity will help developers better understand the method's functionality and required parameters.

src/domain/template/template/template.service.ts (1)

Line range hint 383-402: Refactoring to separate nameID lookup from UUID lookup

The changes align with the PR objective of separating the lookup by nameID from the lookup by UUID. This improves the clarity and specificity of the method. However, there are a few points to consider:

  1. The method now searches for a template using the id field (line 392) instead of nameID. This seems inconsistent with the method name and purpose.

  2. The error message (line 398) correctly mentions NameID, but the actual search is still performed using the id field.

  3. Consider adding a comment explaining why this separation is important for the system's architecture.

To address these issues, consider the following changes:

async getTemplateByNameIDInTemplatesSetOrFail(
  templatesSetID: string,
  templateNameId: string
): Promise<ITemplate> {
  const template = await this.templateRepository.findOne({
    where: {
      templatesSet: {
        id: templatesSetID,
      },
-     id: templateNameId,
+     nameID: templateNameId,
    },
  });

  if (!template) {
    throw new EntityNotFoundException(
      `Templates with NameID (${templateNameId}) not found in templatesSet with ID: ${templatesSetID}!`,
      LogContext.TEMPLATES
    );
  }
  return template;
}

Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this method:

/**
 * Retrieves a template by its nameID within a specific templates set.
 * This method is part of the effort to separate nameID lookups from UUID lookups,
 * improving the logical independence of these operations.
 */
async getTemplateByNameIDInTemplatesSetOrFail(
  // ... rest of the method
)

To ensure that this change doesn't break existing functionality, we should verify that all calls to this method are using the correct parameter. Let's search for usages of this method:

src/library/innovation-pack/innovaton.pack.service.ts (1)

150-154: Simplified lookup in getInnovationPackOrFail improves clarity

The refactored method now directly queries by id, which simplifies the logic and enhances readability.

@ccanos ccanos merged commit a382fc7 into develop Oct 3, 2024
3 checks passed
@ccanos ccanos deleted the client-6293 branch October 3, 2024 16:39
where: {
templatesSet: {
id: templatesSetID,
},
nameID: templateIdOrNameId,
id: templateNameId,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

missed this, creating another PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants