Limit the answers length on ApplicationForm #7419
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces enhanced validation for form inputs in the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Form
participant Validator
User->>Form: Enters form input
Form->>Validator: Validate input
Validator-->>Validator: Check required status
Validator-->>Validator: Check max length
Validator-->>Form: Validation result
Form-->>User: Display validation feedback
The sequence diagram illustrates the validation process, showing how user input is checked against both required status and maximum length constraints before being processed by the form. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/domain/community/application/applicationButton/ApplicationDialog.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
src/domain/community/application/applicationButton/ApplicationDialog.tsx (1)
Pattern src/**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Review the React.js/TypeScript/JavaScript code for best practices and potential bugs.
Ensure that the code adheres to TypeScript's typing system and modern standards.
Use the following code guide documentation in the codebase: 'docs/code-guidelines.md'.
Ensure sufficient error handling and logging is present, but note:
- We have a global error handler in place. So local
try/catchblocks are not required unless they provide value beyond what the global error handler already covers. - Avoid flagging the absence of local error handling in cases where the global error handler suffices.
- Avoid flagging the absence of logging in cases where the global logger is already in place (graphql usage).
Inform about the recommendation of not using non-null assertion,
except on GraphQL queries where the variable is asserted non-null and followed by a
skip: with the same variable.
Examples:
- Not Required: there's a skip
{
variables: { templateId: templateId! },
skip: !templateId,
}
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- SQL Injection
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery)
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/domain/community/application/applicationButton/ApplicationDialog.tsx (2)
62-64: LGTM: Correct dependency array in useMemo.The validation schema's useMemo dependency array correctly includes both
questionsandtfunction, ensuring proper reactivity.
62-64: LGTM: Robust maxLength implementation.The implementation provides two layers of length validation:
- UI constraint through FormikInputField's maxLength prop
- Schema validation through Yup's max() validator
This ensures a good user experience while maintaining data integrity.
src/domain/community/application/applicationButton/ApplicationDialog.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
* Limit the answers length on ApplicationForm * Fix error message --------- Co-authored-by: Petar Kolev <[email protected]>
server #4823
Strictly not needed for this fix, but I detected that the form was not enforcing the maxLength of the answers either, this should do it.
Summary by CodeRabbit