You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 29, 2023. It is now read-only.
Hi, there.
Thanks for your code. But seems your implementation is different from the EEGnet paper. In the paper there is a depthwise conv lary which is a 1*1 conv. So I suppose this is not the same as the implementation in the paper?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
EEGnet design has changed in 2018. I don't know of further revisions. This
implement is of the first version. At that time, the authors hadn't
released their code. Now they have. Please use the authors' original
implementation linked in my repo itself.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2021, 3:21 PM xiaolongwu0713 ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi, there.
Thanks for your code. But seems your implementation is different from the
EEGnet paper. In the paper there is a depthwise conv lary which is a 1*1
conv. So I suppose this is not the same as the implementation in the paper?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABFBDDLJ4IVXME2ICDG5XPTS4XQWLANCNFSM4W32GH7A>
.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Hi, there.
Thanks for your code. But seems your implementation is different from the EEGnet paper. In the paper there is a depthwise conv lary which is a 1*1 conv. So I suppose this is not the same as the implementation in the paper?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: