-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 506
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Segmentation fault when using --soloFeatures Velocyto #1602
Comments
Hi Georgette, could you please send me the Log.out file from your run? |
Hi Alex This is the log file for the failed run: Log.out.txt Thanks |
I also get a segfault when setting Command: EDIT: |
Hi Georgette, Michael, I was trying to reproduce this seg-faults with both sets of parameters, but it did not happen on m test sets. |
I have found another potential problem that may be causing a seg-fault and fixed it: |
Dear Alex I tested Also, I tested again with the exact same conditions (except STAR version obviously) on So the problem is gone for me. Thanks much Alex! |
Hi Michael, |
Hello, I am also having a velocyto-induced segfault issue with STAR version 2.7.9a. This is with paired-end alignment and option '--peOverlapNbasesMin 5' This is with 3' 10x genomics 150x150bp sequencing which I assume is not a normal use case. Do you know if it works with 5' assay data? See also #1366. Thanks.
|
Hi John, Velocyto calculation may not work with 5' protocol, and --peOverlapNbasesMin may not work properly with any solo options. |
Hi Alex
Thanks for the great program.
I've been getting a segmentation fault error which happens with both the newest patch (2.7.10a_alpha_220601) as well as previous patches for 2.7.10a_alpha and version 2.7.9a. I've narrowed the problem down to when I include --soloFeatures Velocyto as it works fine when I use "--soloFeatures Gene GeneFull SJ". Just noticed this was also mentioned as a side issue in another thread: #1366
As a work around am I right that if I subtract Gene counts from GeneFull counts I would effectively end up with un-spliced counts, and with Gene counts representing spliced+ambiguous counts? If so this may be the best approach anyway as the He et al. 2022 Alevin-fry paper (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-022-01408-3) shows that RNA velocity may be improved by combining ambiguous with spliced reads. Or are ambiguous reads not counted in Gene counts?
Thanks
Georgette
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: