Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update upgrade_from_50_to_60.rst #1790

Open
wants to merge 53 commits into
base: 6.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

valerie-schneider
Copy link
Contributor

Add link to /cloud_edition/flexibility_mode/docs/job_consumers_and_workers following ticket SDS-23861

nmarniesse and others added 30 commits February 7, 2022 08:40
* Use Ubuntu 20.04 Circle CI machines

* Upgrade to Sphinx 4.4

* Fix broken links
Update docs for version 6.0
Update the PIM install command for docker
jmleroux and others added 23 commits March 15, 2022 10:10
…n-4.0-to-5.0-and-events

API-1741 - Update PIM doc according events API installation to migrat…
PIM:10344: Add dqi command to launch in 5.0 to 6.0 migration
PLG-779: initiate doc to migrate from 6.0 to 7.0
* PIM-10344: [Backport] Add dqi command to launch in 5.0 to 6.0 migration

* PIM-10376 WIP update CE 6.0 install process

* PIM-10376: Update doc for debian install

* PIM-10376: Ubuntu system install docs

* PIM-10376: Update patching doc

* PIM-10376: change php version

* PIM-10376: Fix broken link

* PIM-10376: Mysql download link version

* PIM-10376: node versions in install doc

* Remove badger links

Co-authored-by: Bryan Stéphan <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: BryanS29-akeneo <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Adrien Migaire <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Pierre Maraître <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Céline Morin <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas Marniesse <[email protected]>
PLG-469: Add dqi command to launch before doctrine migrations
Add link to /cloud_edition/flexibility_mode/docs/job_consumers_and_workers following ticket SDS-23861
Copy link
Contributor

@jmleroux jmleroux left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this PR be done on 6.0 branch before master?

@jmleroux jmleroux self-assigned this Jun 3, 2022
@valerie-schneider
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yep you are totally right 😱 I did not check the branch, thanks for the heads up !

@valerie-schneider valerie-schneider changed the base branch from master to 6.0 June 7, 2022 08:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.