This library creates two helper functions designed to parse device orientation and devicemotion events. It returns objects that you can query as per the spec at the W3C with as much consistency as possible provided. Currently as per this document: http://dev.w3.org/geo/api/spec-source-orientation
Most devices now support at least part of the spec with motion being the most weakly supported in terms of the values being exposed but orientation being most wacky due to varying implementations.
The aim of this library is to attempt to normalise the way the different vendors are implementing the API and make it consistent across browsers.
This library is licenced under a BSD style licence as per the licence document included in the repo.
All issues etc should be logged at the github repo at http://github.com/ajfisher/deviceapi-normaliser/
Assumes - Jquery is installed so access to $.browser object is available.
Install the file in your path, include it in a script tag (after jquery).
Call the init function for the motion / orientation object:
mo.init();
This will do the various device detection etc as needed so it can work out what corrections are required.
Then add your eventlisteners to your page:
window.addEventListener("deviceorientation", [my_orientation_change_handler], false);
window.addEventListener("devicemotion", [my_motion_change_handler], false);
You will need to define your own handlers for the methods given above.
In these methods simply call the relevant function below and you'll be returned an object as per the spec.
You will need to call it with the event object passed into the handler.
Eg:
- function my_orientation_change_handler(e) {
var obj = deviceOrientation(e);
// returns obj.gamma obj.alpha obj.beta
}
- function my_motion_change_handler(e) {
var obj = deviceMotion(e);
// returns obj.accelerationIncludingGravity.x obj.accelerationIncludingGravity.y obj.accelerationIncludingGravity.z
}
- iOS devices prior to the iPhone 4 do not have a gyro and as a result don't provide that data back.
- Mobile chrome has only partial support on Android (orientation only). There is an outstanding ticket to get motion included though (https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=135804)
- rotationRate is partly supported but seemingly not entirely consistent for those devices that support it.
- doing Feature detection of the motion and orientation events isn't reliable due to misreporting
- Firefox - Gingerbread (2.3)+ devices (Motion and Orientation) NB: Firefox is not available on 2.3 anymore for new installs
- Chrome for Android - ICS (4.0)+ Orientation only (no motion)
- Android Browser - ICS (4.0)+ (Orientation and some motion)
- Chrome for Android - JB Orientation only (no motion)
- Firefox - JB Orientation and Motion.
- Note that the "stock" Android browser no longer exists as of JellyBean in favour of Chrome.
- Chrome for iOS - iOS6+ Motion and Orientation
- Mobile Safari - iOS4+ Motion and Orientation
- Tested on the Blackberry Playbook stock browser - Motion and Orientation
The specs suggest the following:
- X is in the plane of the ground and is positive to the East (-ive to West)
- Y is in the plane of the ground and is positive to the North (-ive to South)
- Z is perpendicular to the ground plane and is positive towards the sky (negative into the earth)
Rotation should be expressed using the right hand rule, thus positive values with rotation clockwise around the axis of rotation when looking down the axis.
The tables below express where the zero point is for a given axis, what the values are for it's rotational range, whether it obeys the Right Hand Rule* and any further notes.
- RHR* = Right Hand Rule. That positive values increase when rotating clockwise
- around the axis of rotation when looking along the axis' postive trajectory. This causes confusion because for a compass it looks like you're going backwards but that's because you're looking along the -ive trajectory of the Z axis.
With respect to RHR, Y=Yes, N=No and P=Partial which means it follows some of the RHR guidance
The spec is unclear what the defaults should be and so as a result many different choices are taken by the vendors. This causes confusion and the spec is not clear about what 0 degrees should actually be. From the example it is implied that North is 0 degrees because West is given as +90 degrees (which is correct under the RHR).
The range is tested by holding the device level in the horizontal plane, orienting it to the zero point then turning it through 360 degrees, observing its range and direction.
Zero point | RHR* | Range | |
---|---|---|---|
Reference: | North (0) | Y | [0, 360] |
iOS Chome: | East (90) | Y | [0, 360] |
iOS Safari: | East (90) | Y | [0, 360] |
Blackberry: | South(180) | N | [0, 360] |
Android ICS | |||
Chrome: | North (0) | Y | [0, 360] |
Stock: | West (270) | Y | [0, 360] |
Firefox: | North (0) | N | [0, 360] |
Android JB | |||
Chrome: | North(0) | Y | [0, 360] |
Firefox | North (0) | N | [0, 360] |
The spec defines zero point as being flat in the horizontal plane. All browsers now support this model. Note that there are some issues in the ranging of the values.
The range is tested by holding the device level in the horizontal plan and confirming the zero point. The device is then rotated around the X axis through 90 degrees (screen faces observer), then through the next 90 degrees (screen face down), then the remaining 180 degrees completing the bottom portion of the rotation.
Zero point | RHR* | Range | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reference | Horiz Plane | Y | [0, -180|180] | |
iOS Chome: | Horiz Plane | Y | [-90, 90] | Full range of rotation not supported.[1] |
iOS Safari: | Horiz Plane | Y | [-90, 90] | Full range of rotation not supported.[1] |
Backberry: | Horiz Plane | Y | [0, -180|180] | Per spec |
Android ICS | ||||
Chrome: |
|
Y | [-90, 90] | Full range of rotation not supported.[1] |
Stock |
|
Y | [-90, 90] | Full range of rotation not supported.[1] |
Firefox |
|
N | [0, 180|-180] | Back to front[2] |
Android JB | ||||
Chrome: |
|
Y | [-90, 90] | Full range of rotation not supported.[1] |
Firefox |
|
N | [0, 180|-180] | Back to front[2] |
[1] Under iOS as well as the stock Android browser and Chrome for Android, the rotation goes the right direction from the horizontal plane however once it hits the maximal or minimal point at (90 | -90 degrees) it simply starts to decrease again, rather than provide the full rotation.
[2] In FF on android the rotation is back to front but it does go through the full range to 180 degrees. However under firefox the value is -90 when the top is point upwards and 90 when the top of the device points downwards. This is a reversing of the RHR.
The spec defines the zero point as being level in the horizontal place. Again there are some issues with ranges and some implied issues with how the W3C have defined this as they are assuming only 90 degrees of rotation around the Y axis is relevant.
The range is tested by holding the device level in the horizontal plane and confirming a zero point. The device it then rotated around the Y axis 90 degrees clockwise (screen faces right) then again (screen faces down) and then through the other 180 degrees back to the origin.
Zero point | RHR* | Range | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reference | Horiz Plane | Y | [0, 90|-90] | [1] |
iOS Chome: | Horiz Plane | Y | [0, 180|-180] | Full range of rotation not supported[2] |
iOS Safari: | Horiz Plane | Y | [0, 180|-180] | Full range of rotation not supported[2] |
Blackberry: | Horiz Plane | Y | [0, 90|-90] | Per Spec |
Android ICS | ||||
Chrome: |
|
Y | [0, 270|-90] | Odd range to cope with the gaps[3] |
Stock: |
|
Y | [0, 270|-90] | Odd range to cope with the gaps[3] |
Firefox |
|
N | [0, -90|90] | Range back to front [4] |
Android JB | ||||
Chrome: |
|
Y | [0, 270|-90] | Odd range to cope with the gaps[3] |
Firefox |
|
N | [0, -90|90] | Range back to front [4] |
[1] This is poor definition by the W3C as it implies rotation only happens to 90 degrees from the horizontal plane, thus causing an issue when you go under this.
[2] Under iOS rotation starts from the horizontal plan with the screen facing up as the zero point. Rotating around the Y axis so that the screen is facing down will result in a value of 180 or -180. If the rotation occurs clockwise the values increase through the +ive range, if the rotation is anti-clockwise then the values increase through the -ive range. Thus resting the R edge (L edge upwards) the value is 90, the reverse (resting on the L edge, R edge up) means the value is -90.
[3] The Chrome for Android and stock android browsers create the right rotational vales for the +-90 range however the gap after 90 on the clockwise rotation is filled with increasing +ive values until it reaches the -90 value. This provides an opportunity to know exactly how far the device is rotated around the Y axis but can't be replicated by any of the others.
[4] Firefox reverses its range the same way as it does on Beta. The range is correct however rotation clockwise results in a -ive number and the reverse.
Support for motion properties:
Acc | AccIG | Rot | Interval | |
---|---|---|---|---|
iOS Chome: | N | Y | N | N |
iOS Safari: | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Android Chrome: | N | N | N | N |
Android Stock: | N | Y | N | Y |
Android FF: | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Blackberry | Y | N | N | Y[1] |
[1] Weirdly BB uses a variable interval instead of a constant which is the guidance from the spec. This implies the sampling is done in software rather than hardware off the accelerometer chip?
Given the large range of results and the incomplete handling of motion versus orientation across devices. Understanding the differences between the devices is critical in order to have similar performance in a multi-device context (eg for games). The following is some information about feature detection and how different browsers handle it.
Simply checking for if(window.DeviceOrientationEvent) yields the following:
Browser | Result | Notes |
---|---|---|
Chrome (Desktop) | True | Failure[1] |
Chrome (JB/ICS) | True | [2] |
Chrome (iOS) | True | |
Firefox (JB/ICS) | True | |
Safari (iOS) | True | |
Blackberry | True | [2] |
Android (stock) | True | [1] |
[1] Chrome on desktop provides a false positive with this event suggesting it's available in all versions of desktop chrome but reports nothing unless a tilt sensor is available to the computer
[2] Chrome on Android, the ICS stock Android browser and the BB stock browser all detect correctly but only if a warm up time for the gyro is provided. If this is detected with immediate execution it will fail with false results.
Simply checking for if(window.DeviceMotionEvent) yields the following:
Browser | Result | Notes |
---|---|---|
Chrome (Desktop) | False | |
Chrome (JB/ICS) | False | |
Chrome (iOS) | True | |
Firefox (JB/ICS) | True | |
Safari (iOS) | True | |
Blackberry | True | |
Android Stock | True |
The results from motion are much more consistent with reality, with no false positives and actual detection occurring correctly in all instances.
Using the various ways browsers report their capability given above as well as a very small dose of browser type detection or UA checks (it's understood this is not ideal but it's skewed towards extremely loose detection checks and there's no other alternative) it is possible to determine what device is being used and as a result what modifications are required to bring the values from the events back on spec.
It should be noted that this really only applies to the orientation events as the motion spec is either correct or not implemented at all.
The table below summarises the event feature detection, decisions about what browser it's likely to be or whether further detection is actually required.
Orientation | Motion | OS | Browser | Further detection |
---|---|---|---|---|
True | True | iOS | Safari / Chrome | $.browser.webkit && !Android |
Android | Firefox | ! $.browser.webkit | ||
Stock | userAgent.match(/Android/i) | |||
Blackberry | Stock | userAgent.match(/RIM|Blackberry/i) | ||
True | False | Desktop | Webkit | N/A |
Android | Chrome | userAgent.match(/Android/i) |
As can be seen in the table below, all of the major browsers in play require a degree of change in order to bring them back to the standard for orientation.
Browser / OS | Correction |
---|---|
iOS Webkit | Alpha: (-90 degrees) Beta: (correct range) Gamma: (Limit range) |
Android: | |
Firefox | Alpha, Beta, Gamma (Reverse RHR) |
Stock | Alpha None Beta (Correct range) Gamma (Limit Range) |
Chrome | Alpha: None Beta: (Correct range) Gamma: (Limit Range) |
Blackberry | Alpha: (-180 degrees) Beta: None Gamma: None |
NB: This section needs considerable refactoring based on the updated spec and the way the vendors have implemented it. For the moment there are no behavioural changes from the default.
The following mods have been made to bring the devices into "line" with the spec.
Safari:
- Early iOS devices have no gyro - as such any call to deviceOrientation will return the right object but with data as null.
Firefox:
- Write handler to detect whether eventlisteners should be bound or not based on capabilities.