Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update/integration iqair devices #4015

Conversation

NicholasTurner23
Copy link
Contributor

@NicholasTurner23 NicholasTurner23 commented Dec 6, 2024

Description

[Provide a brief description of the changes made in this PR]

Just some clean up for bam data

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced data validation processes for improved accuracy in handling sensor data.
    • Improved clarity and consistency in DataFrame column assignments and renaming for better data readability.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved issues related to NaN value handling during data type conversion, preventing errors.
  • Refactor

    • Simplified syntax for column assignments in data extraction methods.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 6, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to the DataValidationUtils and DataWarehouseUtils classes within the src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils directory. Key modifications include adjustments in the control flow of the remove_outliers method to enhance validation logic based on the presence of a "network" column. Additionally, the format_data_types method has been improved for better handling of NaN values during data type conversions. In the DataWarehouseUtils, the assignment of the device_category column has been simplified, and the extract_sites_meta_data method has been enhanced with clearer column renaming.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/data_validator.py - Modified control flow in remove_outliers for correct application of get_valid_value.
- Updated format_data_types to handle NaN values more robustly.
src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/data_warehouse_utils.py - Simplified assignment of device_category in extract_hourly_bam_data and extract_hourly_low_cost_data.
- Enhanced column renaming in extract_sites_meta_data.

Possibly related PRs

  • Cleanup/Sanitize #3758: This PR modifies the DataValidationUtils class in data_validator.py, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR that also affects the same class and file.
  • Update/integration iqair devices #3985: This PR updates the process_data_for_message_broker method in data_validator.py, which is relevant as the main PR also modifies this method, particularly in how data is merged and validated.
  • Update/integration iqair devices #3999: This PR introduces changes to the remove_outliers method in data_validator.py, which aligns with the main PR's focus on enhancing data validation processes, particularly regarding the handling of the "network" column.

Suggested reviewers

  • Baalmart
  • BenjaminSsempala

🎉 In the realm of data, where numbers align,
Changes were made, oh so divine!
Outliers removed with a graceful flow,
Categories simplified, watch them glow!
With clearer names and types in sight,
Data validation shines ever so bright! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 12.21%. Comparing base (7bd1427) to head (5fbb05e).
Report is 3 commits behind head on staging.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           staging    #4015      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    11.73%   12.21%   +0.48%     
===========================================
  Files          114       51      -63     
  Lines        15331     4673   -10658     
  Branches       319      319              
===========================================
- Hits          1799      571    -1228     
+ Misses       13532     4102    -9430     

see 63 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/data_warehouse_utils.py (1)

48-48: LGTM! Consider using consistent assignment style across the file.

The simplified syntax for device category assignment is clean and effective. However, for consistency, you might want to update similar assignments throughout the file (e.g., in the merge_datasets method) to use this same direct assignment style.

Consider updating other device category assignments to match this style:

-        low_cost_data.loc[:, "device_category"] = str(DeviceCategory.LOW_COST)
-        bam_data.loc[:, "device_category"] = str(DeviceCategory.BAM)
+        low_cost_data["device_category"] = str(DeviceCategory.LOW_COST)
+        bam_data["device_category"] = str(DeviceCategory.BAM)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7bd1427 and 5fbb05e.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/data_validator.py (1 hunks)
  • src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/data_warehouse_utils.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/data_validator.py

165-165: Function definition does not bind loop variable mapped_name

(B023)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/data_validator.py (1)

162-166: LGTM! Logical improvement in control flow.

The adjusted indentation ensures proper validation of all rows when the 'network' column is absent, which is the correct behavior for handling non-network-specific data.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)

165-165: Function definition does not bind loop variable mapped_name

(B023)

Comment on lines +163 to +166
data[col] = data[col].apply(
lambda x: DataValidationUtils.get_valid_value(
column_name=mapped_name, row_value=x
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix potential loop variable binding issue.

The current implementation might lead to unexpected behavior as the lambda function captures the loop variable mapped_name from the outer scope.

Apply this fix to ensure proper variable binding:

-                data[col] = data[col].apply(
-                    lambda x: DataValidationUtils.get_valid_value(
-                        column_name=mapped_name, row_value=x
-                    )
-                )
+                mapped_name_current = mapped_name  # Capture current value
+                data[col] = data[col].apply(
+                    lambda x, name=mapped_name_current: DataValidationUtils.get_valid_value(
+                        column_name=name, row_value=x
+                    )
+                )
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
data[col] = data[col].apply(
lambda x: DataValidationUtils.get_valid_value(
column_name=mapped_name, row_value=x
)
mapped_name_current = mapped_name # Capture current value
data[col] = data[col].apply(
lambda x, name=mapped_name_current: DataValidationUtils.get_valid_value(
column_name=name, row_value=x
)
)
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)

165-165: Function definition does not bind loop variable mapped_name

(B023)

@Baalmart Baalmart merged commit e09fa9b into airqo-platform:staging Dec 6, 2024
48 checks passed
@Baalmart Baalmart mentioned this pull request Dec 6, 2024
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants