Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(sankey): add @visx/sankey #1880

Merged
merged 29 commits into from
Nov 7, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jacksonhardaker
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Enhancements

@jacksonhardaker
Copy link
Contributor Author

@williaster When you have a moment to approve the workflow again, I believe I've resolved the steps (at least locally) so that it will complete. That said, I'm not sure what the happo output will be, given there are new additions to the demo site.

@jacksonhardaker
Copy link
Contributor Author

@williaster Happy to help resolve any issues surfaced in happo, if you can point me to them? I suspect most of the issues are because of the newly added examples/docs?

@williaster
Copy link
Collaborator

hey @jacksonhardaker happo looks good to me (sorry it's opaque to contributors, we can't open up access to that check unfortunately). the diff it flagged was just a new addition as you suspected

thanks so much for the contribution, will try and get this reviewed with @hshoff in the next few days. thanks for your patience!

image

Copy link
Collaborator

@williaster williaster left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @jacksonhardaker thank you SO MUCH for this awesome contribution. everything looks spectacular, we appreciate how well you followed code styles/all of the integration points for a new package including tests and a gallery example with sandbox 🙏 🙏 🙏

major apologies on the slow review, it's been a really busy time for the maintainers. I had 2x super small comments and then I think it's good to go!! 🚀 THANK YOU AGAIN! it's always exciting to have new packages and functionality.

@@ -45,6 +46,8 @@ import { packageJson as textPackageJson } from '../components/Gallery/TextTile';
import extractVisxDepsFromPackageJson from '../components/util/extractVisxDepsFromPackageJson';
import { VisxPackage } from '../types';

console.log({ sankeyPackageJson });
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

reminder to remove this

packages/visx-sankey/Readme.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
"@types/react": "*",
"@visx/group": "3.3.0",
"classnames": "^2.3.1",
"d3-sankey": "^0.12.3",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

noting for my future self that this package doesn't have an esm-only version yet, so doesn't need to be in @visx/vendor. d3-sankey itself has dependencies on d3-array and d3-shape (and transitive internmap) but they aren't ESM-only versions

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
export { default as Sankey } from './Sankey';
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this looks great, thanks for adding the relevant types (including SankeyProps) as well 💯

</svg>,
);

describe('<Sankey />', () => {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👏 ty!! these are great

jacksonhardaker and others added 2 commits November 6, 2024 16:35
Co-authored-by: Chris Williams <[email protected]>
@jacksonhardaker
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @williaster. I made those small tweaks, so should be good to go.

@williaster
Copy link
Collaborator

amazing! lgtm, will merge this and it should be released/live soon!

thanks again for the great work here 🙌

@williaster williaster merged commit 07a91d8 into airbnb:master Nov 7, 2024
2 checks passed
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 7, 2024

🎉 This PR is included in version v3.12.0 of the packages modified 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants