[3.5] Improve documentation for BaseRequest.path and BaseRequest.raw_path (#3791)

[asvetlov]

(cherry picked from commit 6b0a651)

Co-authored-by: Harmon [email protected]

What do these changes do?

Are there changes in behavior for the user?

Related issue number

Checklist

• I think the code is well written
• Unit tests for the changes exist
• Documentation reflects the changes
• If you provide code modification, please add yourself to CONTRIBUTORS.txt
  • The format is <Name> <Surname>.
  • Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names.
• Add a new news fragment into the CHANGES folder
  • name it <issue_id>.<type> for example (588.bugfix)
  • if you don't have an issue_id change it to the pr id after creating the pr
  • ensure type is one of the following:
    • .feature: Signifying a new feature.
    • .bugfix: Signifying a bug fix.
    • .doc: Signifying a documentation improvement.
    • .removal: Signifying a deprecation or removal of public API.
    • .misc: A ticket has been closed, but it is not of interest to users.
  • Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: "Fix issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files."

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #3792 into 3.5 will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              3.5    #3792   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.94%   97.94%           
=======================================
  Files          44       44           
  Lines        8576     8576           
  Branches     1380     1380           
=======================================
  Hits         8400     8400           
  Misses         71       71           
  Partials      105      105

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2354926...971a279. Read the comment docs.