Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix stream .read() / .readany() / .iter_any() (#3525) #3527

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 11, 2019
Merged

Conversation

socketpair
Copy link
Contributor

@socketpair socketpair commented Jan 11, 2019

What do these changes do?

Are there changes in behavior for the user?

Related issue number

Checklist

  • I think the code is well written
  • Unit tests for the changes exist
  • Documentation reflects the changes
  • If you provide code modification, please add yourself to CONTRIBUTORS.txt
    • The format is <Name> <Surname>.
    • Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names.
  • Add a new news fragment into the CHANGES folder
    • name it <issue_id>.<type> for example (588.bugfix)
    • if you don't have an issue_id change it to the pr id after creating the pr
    • ensure type is one of the following:
      • .feature: Signifying a new feature.
      • .bugfix: Signifying a bug fix.
      • .doc: Signifying a documentation improvement.
      • .removal: Signifying a deprecation or removal of public API.
      • .misc: A ticket has been closed, but it is not of interest to users.
    • Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: "Fix issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files."

@socketpair socketpair requested a review from asvetlov as a code owner January 11, 2019 22:02
@socketpair
Copy link
Contributor Author

@asvetlov URGENT patch. Major bug. Please merge and backport as soon as possible.

@asvetlov
Copy link
Member

Any test?

@socketpair
Copy link
Contributor Author

socketpair commented Jan 11, 2019

Later I will write. I consider to merge immediatelly. As 3.x is heavily broken

@asvetlov
Copy link
Member

Well, ok. Will do just after passing CI

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #3527 into master will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3527      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.94%   97.92%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          44       44              
  Lines        8562     8562              
  Branches     1381     1381              
==========================================
- Hits         8386     8384       -2     
- Misses         71       72       +1     
- Partials      105      106       +1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
aiohttp/streams.py 98.72% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
aiohttp/web_fileresponse.py 96.55% <0%> (-1.15%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a86af67...aaa518f. Read the comment docs.

@asvetlov asvetlov merged commit 5c4cb82 into master Jan 11, 2019
asvetlov pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2019
(cherry picked from commit 5c4cb82)

Co-authored-by: Коренберг Марк <[email protected]>
asvetlov added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2019
…3528)

(cherry picked from commit 5c4cb82)

Co-authored-by: Коренберг Марк <[email protected]>
asvetlov pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2019
…) (#3560)

(cherry picked from commit c3f494f)

Co-authored-by: Коренберг Марк <[email protected]>
@socketpair socketpair deleted the iter_any branch January 21, 2019 15:34
asvetlov added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2019
…) (#3560) (#3565)

(cherry picked from commit c3f494f)

Co-authored-by: Коренберг Марк <[email protected]>
@lock lock bot added the outdated label Jan 22, 2020
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 22, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants