Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix bug in CookieJar when a cookie would be expired by mistake #2088

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2017

Conversation

roganov
Copy link
Contributor

@roganov roganov commented Jul 13, 2017

What do these changes do?

Fixes #2084
Unfortunately I couldn't come up with a test case other than to record uvloop's timestamps and replay them. Obviously it highly depends on the internals on CookieJar and the test may become irrelevant it code changes.

Are there changes in behavior for the user?

Hopefully not.

Related issue number

#2084

Checklist

  • I think the code is well written
  • Unit tests for the changes exist
  • Documentation reflects the changes
  • If you provide code modification, please add yourself to CONTRIBUTORS.txt
    • The format is <Name> <Surname>.
    • Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names.
  • Add a new news fragment into the changes folder
    • name it <issue_id>.<type> for example (588.bug)
    • if you don't have an issue_id change it to the pr id after creating the pr
    • ensure type is one of the following:
      • .feature: Signifying a new feature.
      • .bugfix: Signifying a bug fix.
      • .doc: Signifying a documentation improvement.
      • .removal: Signifying a deprecation or removal of public API.
      • .misc: A ticket has been closed, but it is not of interest to users.
    • Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: "Fix issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files."

@roganov roganov force-pushed the fix-cookiejar-#2084 branch from 412c25e to bb63a3c Compare July 13, 2017 19:48
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jul 13, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #2088 into 2.2 will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              2.2    #2088   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.03%   97.03%           
=======================================
  Files          38       38           
  Lines        7684     7684           
  Branches     1341     1341           
=======================================
  Hits         7456     7456           
  Misses        104      104           
  Partials      124      124
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
aiohttp/cookiejar.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 81357fd...d2bb2c5. Read the comment docs.

jar.update_cookies(SimpleCookie('foo="bar"'))

# Assert that there a cookie.
assert jar
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please use more obvious check.
assert len(jar) == 1 for example

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

@roganov roganov force-pushed the fix-cookiejar-#2084 branch from bb63a3c to 29f4f7d Compare July 14, 2017 06:08
@roganov roganov force-pushed the fix-cookiejar-#2084 branch from 29f4f7d to d2bb2c5 Compare July 14, 2017 07:34
@asvetlov asvetlov merged commit f6896b5 into aio-libs:2.2 Jul 25, 2017
@asvetlov
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented Oct 28, 2019

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been
any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for
related bugs.

If you feel like there's important points made in this discussion,
please include those exceprts into that new issue.

@lock lock bot added the outdated label Oct 28, 2019
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 28, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants