Add Utah Tax Entities 2024 from Utah State Tax Commission

[DenisePeterson]

Summary

• Proposed Readable Name: Utah Tax Entities 2024
• Proposed Internal Dataset Name: SGID.ECONOMY.TaxEntities2024
• Proposed External Dataset Name: opensgid.economy.tax_entities_2024
• Proposed Data Category: ECONOMY
• Data Description: Tax Entities in the State of Utah as maintained by the Utah State Tax Commission
• Source Agency/Entity: Utah State Tax Commission
• Contact: Nick Kenczka
• Update Frequency: Annually

This is updated Tax Entities data for 2024 and was provided by the Utah State Tax Commission.

The data should be available in

1 Check [x] all the areas where you expect the data to show up.

• Internal SGID
• Open SGID
• ArcGIS Online
• Open Data

The data is of high quality

• Sweeper checks have run and passed (@ZachBeck on 2024/05/22)
• The minimum requirements for metadata are populated (@ZachBeck on 2024/05/22)
• The data complies with our domain rules (@ZachBeck on 2024/05/22)

Where is the data source

Choose one.

• Internal SGID
• Farm from AGOL (agol item url)

Action items

1. Assign a person who should complete the task by replacing name with their github @name.
2. Check [x] the box when the task is completed and add the date of completion.
3. Strike out all items that do not apply.

• Add data to the Internal SGID (@ZachBeck, completed: 2024/05/22)
• Configure forklift for Farm from AGOL (name, completed: 2024/00/00)
• Update relevant gis.utah.gov data pages (@DenisePeterson, completed: 2024/06/03)
• Add a SGID Index record (@ZachBeck, completed: 2024/05/22)
• Complete a SGID.META.AGOLItems record (@ZachBeck, completed: 2024/05/22)
  • AGOL_ITEM_ID will be populated by Forklift after it publishes the new AGOL item.
• Complete an AGOLItems_shelved record for any static or shelved item (name, completed: 2024/00/00)
• Define a record set with archives (@brigsz, completed: 2024/06/13)

🤖 Automation validation

1. Assign yourself or someone to check the item by replacing name with their github @name.
2. Check [x] the box and add the date of verification 2020/01/01 when the task is verified.
3. Strike out all items that do not apply.

• Open SGID via cloudb (@stdavis on 2024/05/28)
• ArcGIS Online via forklift (@stdavis on 2024/05/28)
• Auditor ran successfully (@jacobdadams on 2024/05/24)
• SGID on ArcGIS (@stdavis on 2024/05/28)
• gis.utah.gov data pages (@steveoh on 2024/06/10)
• sgid-index (@stdavis on 2024/05/28)

Notification

• Twitter (@steveoh)

Group Task Assignments

1. Check [x] the box when you have assigned all the tasks relevant to your group.

• Data Team (@gregbunce)
• Dev Team (@steveoh)
• Cadastre Team (@rkelson)

[ZachBeck]

Do we know if this dataset is for 2023 or 2024?

[DenisePeterson]

2024

…

On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 11:17 AM Zach Beck ***@***.***> wrote: Do we know if this dataset is for 2023 or 2024? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#321 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BCL4HB64TDFMM4ECUW66CQTZDN6RJAVCNFSM6AAAAABHWV7N72VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMRTGA4DOMJWHA> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[stdavis]

I added the itemId to the SGID Index spreadsheet for this dataset today.

[agrc-conductor]

conductor results for tasks - 321

check	status
ZachBeck has completed 6 out of 6 tasks	👍
@DenisePeterson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks	⛔
@brigsz has completed 0 out of 1 tasks	⛔
stdavis has completed 4 out of 4 tasks	👍
jacobdadams has completed 1 out of 1 tasks	👍
@steveoh has completed 2 out of 3 tasks	⛔
@gregbunce has completed 0 out of 1 tasks	⛔
@rkelson has completed 0 out of 1 tasks	⛔

[agrc-conductor]

conductor results for ECONOMY.TaxEntities2024

check	status
internal sgid	👍
meta table
- item id	👍
- item name	👍
- geometry type	👍
open sgid	👍
open data	👍
arcgis online	👍
stewardship
- justification	⛔
- dataContactEmail	⛔
- dataContactName	⛔
- displayName	👍
- description	👍
- category	👍
- productType	👍
- ugrcSteward	👍

[agrc-conductor]

conductor results for tasks - 321

check	status
ZachBeck has completed 6 out of 6 tasks	👍
DenisePeterson has completed 1 out of 1 tasks	👍
@brigsz has completed 0 out of 1 tasks	⛔
stdavis has completed 4 out of 4 tasks	👍
jacobdadams has completed 1 out of 1 tasks	👍
@steveoh has completed 2 out of 3 tasks	⛔
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks	👍
rkelson has completed 1 out of 1 tasks	👍

[agrc-conductor]

conductor results for ECONOMY.TaxEntities2024

check	status
internal sgid	👍
meta table
- item id	👍
- item name	👍
- geometry type	👍
open sgid	👍
open data	👍
arcgis online	👍
stewardship
- displayName	👍
- description	👍
- justification	👍
- category	👍
- productType	👍
- ugrcSteward	👍
- dataContactEmail	👍
- dataContactName	👍

[brigsz]

I am unsure if we are facing a terminology issue on this. Right now there is a
series # of 27040 and a retention schedule. The Series has a title of
SERIES: 27040
TITLE: Tax entities records
DATES: 1995-
ARRANGEMENT: Grouped by file type, thereunder chronological

I would imagine that since the series exists, then this record, just is assigned to that series. Not sure we need to actually call out the record. I will continue to look

I would imagine now, it does need to be scheduled to actually send it to archives with the info such as record series and name etc.

[brigsz]

Okay, concerning Record Series etc. When a layer is created for the SGID someone must check to see does it fit into a record series. If not work it out, and sounds like we need to have a schedule or something that will trigger a submission to archives with the proper forms.

@steveoh I know this conversation is only taking place in this issue, but applies to many issues. Do you want to change the template and then I will look at each layer and see if it fits into a record series or if we need to do something more?

[steveoh]

The issue template is per dataset so I'm not sure what we'd update it to. What is your suggestion?

I think the check box is to verify that the data fits into an existing series or you will create a new one for it to go in before checking the box.

[brigsz]

Yes, your second paragraph makes total sense. It was just when it calls out Record set, that seems like some official Archives term. Whereas the "making sure the data fits into an existing series or you will create a new one for it to go in before checking the box" sounds very actionable. There must be a line we can put that easily conveys that.

…

On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 11:17 AM steveoh ***@***.***> wrote: The issue template is per dataset so I'm not sure what we'd update it to. What is your suggestion? I think the check box is to make sure that the data fits into an existing series or you will create a new one for it to go in before checking the box. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#321 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABQDVH72EYZM4QYZTXSVEWLZGXNTXAVCNFSM6AAAAABHWV7N72VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNJYHEYDKNBRGY> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[agrc-conductor]

conductor results for tasks - 321

check	status
ZachBeck has completed 6 out of 6 tasks	👍
DenisePeterson has completed 1 out of 1 tasks	👍
brigsz has completed 1 out of 1 tasks	👍
stdavis has completed 4 out of 4 tasks	👍
jacobdadams has completed 1 out of 1 tasks	👍
steveoh has completed 3 out of 3 tasks	👍
gregbunce has completed 1 out of 1 tasks	👍
rkelson has completed 1 out of 1 tasks	👍

[agrc-conductor]

conductor results for ECONOMY.TaxEntities2024

check	status
internal sgid	👍
meta table
- item id	👍
- item name	👍
- geometry type	👍
open sgid	👍
open data	👍
arcgis online	👍
stewardship
- displayName	👍
- description	👍
- justification	👍
- category	👍
- productType	👍
- ugrcSteward	👍
- dataContactEmail	👍
- dataContactName	👍

[stdavis]

@DenisePeterson I think that this issue can be closed out, no?

[DenisePeterson]

@stdavis Thanks for the reminder. Yes! I'll close this out now.