refactor(container)!: move logging and visualization options to Debug…

…Option (cosmos#10302)


## Description



<!-- Add a description of the changes that this PR introduces and the files that
are the most critical to review. -->

---

### Author Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.*

I have...

- [x] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [x] added `!` to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [x] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting))
- [ ] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
- [ ] followed the guidelines for [building modules](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/docs/building-modules)
- [ ] included the necessary unit and integration [tests](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#testing)
- [ ] added a changelog entry to `CHANGELOG.md`
- [x] included comments for [documenting Go code](https://blog.golang.org/godoc)
- [ ] updated the relevant documentation or specification
- [x] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
- [ ] confirmed all CI checks have passed

### Reviewers Checklist

*All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.*

I have...

- [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title
- [ ] confirmed `!` in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
- [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed 
- [ ] reviewed state machine logic
- [ ] reviewed API design and naming
- [ ] reviewed documentation is accurate
- [ ] reviewed tests and test coverage
- [ ] manually tested (if applicable)

container/container.go

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ import (
 )
 
 type container struct {
-	*config
+	*debugConfig
 
 	resolvers map[reflect.Type]resolver
 
@@ -26,9 +26,9 @@ type resolveFrame struct {
 	typ reflect.Type
 }
 
-func newContainer(cfg *config) *container {
+func newContainer(cfg *debugConfig) *container {
 	return &container{
-		config:      cfg,
+		debugConfig: cfg,
 		resolvers:   map[reflect.Type]resolver{},
 		scopes:      map[string]Scope{},
 		callerStack: nil,

container/container_test.go

@@ -516,17 +516,19 @@ func TestLogging(t *testing.T) {
 	require.NoError(t, err)
 	defer os.Remove(graphfile.Name())
 
-	require.NoError(t, container.Run(
+	require.NoError(t, container.RunDebug(
 		func() {},
-		container.Logger(func(s string) {
-			logOut += s
-		}),
-		container.Visualizer(func(g string) {
-			dotGraph = g
-		}),
-		container.LogVisualizer(),
-		container.FileVisualizer(graphfile.Name(), "svg"),
-		container.StdoutLogger(),
+		container.DebugOptions(
+			container.Logger(func(s string) {
+				logOut += s
+			}),
+			container.Visualizer(func(g string) {
+				dotGraph = g
+			}),
+			container.LogVisualizer(),
+			container.FileVisualizer(graphfile.Name(), "svg"),
+			container.StdoutLogger(),
+		),
 	))
 
 	require.Contains(t, logOut, "digraph")