Skip to content

How deep is your art: an experimental study on the limits of artistic understanding in a single-task, single-modality neural network

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

aghazahedim/How-Deep-is-Your-Art

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

42 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

How Deep is Your Art: An Experimental Study on the Limits of Artistic Understanding in a Single-Task, Single-Modality Neural Network

Mahan Agha Zahedi1, Niloofar Gholamrezaei2, Alex Doboli1

1Stony Brook University, 2Texas Tech University

Preprint available on Arxiv

DOI

Abstract

Computational modeling of artwork meaning is complex and difficult. This is because art interpretation is multidimensional and highly subjective. This paper experimentally investigated the degree to which a state-of-the-art Deep Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN), a popular Machine Learning approach, can correctly distinguish modern conceptual art work into the galleries devised by art curators. Two hypotheses were proposed to state that the DCNN model uses Exhibited Properties for classification, like shape and color, but not Non-Exhibited Properties, such as historical context and artist intention. The two hypotheses were experimentally validated using a methodology designed for this purpose. VGG-11 DCNN pre-trained on ImageNet dataset and discriminatively fine-tuned was trained on handcrafted datasets designed from real-world conceptual photography galleries. Experimental results supported the two hypotheses showing that the DCNN model ignores Non-Exhibited Properties and uses only Exhibited Properties for artwork classification. This work points to current DCNN limitations, which should be addressed by future DNN models.

Fig_1_updated

Art analysis using Levinson’s definition of art. (a) Art consists of Exhibited Properties (EXPs) and None-Exhibited Properties (NEXP). (b) Art understanding is gained by relating EXPs to NEXPs rather than merely looking at EXPs. (c) The difficulty in art understanding is shown as a spectrum with an example for each end: top, "Fountain” by Marcel Duchamp, a conceptual piece with a greater significance of NEXPs, and bottom: “The Accident,” by William Geet, a figurative piece with a more literal visual narrative and therefore more significance of EXPs.

Contact

Please feel free to reach out to any of the authors or me at [email protected]

Citation

If you find this project useful in your research, please consider citing:

@article{zahedi2022deep,
  title={How Deep is Your Art: An Experimental Study on the Limits of Artistic Understanding in a Single-Task, Single-Modality Neural Network},
  author={Zahedi, Mahan Agha and Gholamrezaei, Niloofar and Doboli, Alex},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.16031},
  year={2022}
}

About

How deep is your art: an experimental study on the limits of artistic understanding in a single-task, single-modality neural network

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Packages

No packages published