-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement IsPullback suggestions #431
Conversation
Switched the places of unique and unique-diagram for both pullbacks and pushouts; unique is now derived from unique-diagram.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Coming along nicely - a few comments on the current state.
src/Categories/Category/Instance/Properties/Setoids/Extensive.agda
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/Categories/Category/Instance/Properties/Setoids/Extensive.agda
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
; p₁∘universal≈h₁ = X.refl | ||
; p₂∘universal≈h₂ = Y.refl | ||
; unique-diagram = λ eq₁ eq₂ → eq₁ , eq₂ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
would _,_
do?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It doesn't seem like that will work, because there is an implicit argument after eq₂
What about naming? Is |
Thanks for the updates (and sorry on my slowness!). On name: |
I don't really think the name needs to change. I just wanted to make sure there wasn't an obviously-better alternative before I consider the PR done. |
Sure, we can go with that and see if people complain. |
This pull request is intended to address issue #334.
Tasks:
unique
field to bottomunique
withunique-diagram