add services to dashboard #482
Conversation
dosubot
bot
added
the
size:S
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the Redis, ClickHouse, Kafka, and NATS applications, primarily focusing on version increments and the introduction of new Kubernetes Role resources. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/apps/redis/templates/dashboard-resourcemap.yaml (1)
10-14: Document the purpose of each service.Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of each service pattern:
rfs-: Redis Fast Storage?rfrm-: Redis Fast Resource Manager?rfrs-: Redis Fast Resource Service?-external-lb: External Load Balancer
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
packages/apps/redis/Chart.yaml(1 hunks)packages/apps/redis/templates/dashboard-resourcemap.yaml(1 hunks)packages/apps/versions_map(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/apps/redis/Chart.yaml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
packages/apps/redis/templates/dashboard-resourcemap.yaml
[error] 4-4: syntax error: expected , but found ''
(syntax)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/apps/redis/templates/dashboard-resourcemap.yaml (1)
1-15: LGTM! Role follows security best practices.
The Role configuration follows the principle of least privilege by:
- Granting only read-only permissions (get, list, watch)
- Explicitly listing the target services
- Scoping permissions to specific service names
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 4-4: syntax error: expected , but found ''
(syntax)
packages/apps/versions_map (1)
73-74: LGTM! Verify commit reference exists.
The version mapping changes look good:
- Pinning v0.3.0 to a specific commit improves stability
- Adding v0.4.0 aligns with the Chart.yaml version increment
Let's verify the commit reference exists:
| resourceNames: | ||
| - rfs-{{ .Release.Name }} | ||
| - rfrm-{{ .Release.Name }} | ||
| - rfrs-{{ .Release.Name }} | ||
| - "{{ .Release.Name }}-external-lb" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Services referenced in Role may be missing from the cluster configuration
Based on the verification results:
- Only the
{{ .Release.Name }}-external-lbservice is defined in the templates - The services with prefixes
rfs-,rfrm-, andrfrs-are not found in any service definitions within the Redis app templates - These missing services are only referenced in the dashboard resource map
This suggests that the Role is trying to grant access to services that don't exist in the current configuration, which could lead to RBAC issues.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the existence of referenced services.
Let's ensure that all the services referenced in the Role actually exist in the cluster configuration.
Let me gather more information to check for potential StatefulSet or other resources that might be creating these services.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for service definitions in the repository
# Expected: Find template definitions for all services referenced in the Role
echo "Searching for service definitions..."
rg -t yaml --glob 'packages/apps/redis/**/*.yaml' -A 5 'kind:\s+Service'
echo "Searching for specific service names..."
for prefix in "rfs-" "rfrm-" "rfrs-" "-external-lb"; do
echo "Looking for services with prefix: $prefix"
rg -t yaml --glob 'packages/apps/redis/**/*.yaml' "name:\s+.*${prefix}"
done
Length of output: 2096
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for StatefulSet and other potential resources that might be creating these services
echo "Searching for StatefulSet definitions..."
rg -t yaml --glob 'packages/apps/redis/**/*.yaml' -A 10 'kind:\s+StatefulSet'
echo "Searching for any references to the service prefixes in other resources..."
rg -t yaml --glob 'packages/apps/redis/**/*.yaml' 'rfs-|rfrm-|rfrs-'
Length of output: 657
klinch0
force-pushed
the
feature/add-svc-to-dashboard
branch
from
e5f3f62
to
421e34c
Compare
dosubot
bot
added
size:M
klinch0
force-pushed
the
feature/add-svc-to-dashboard
branch
from
421e34c
to
c16b72a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/apps/redis/templates/dashboard-resourcemap.yaml (1)
1-15: LGTM - Role follows security best practicesThe Role configuration demonstrates good security practices:
- Follows principle of least privilege with read-only operations
- Explicitly enumerates allowed services instead of using wildcards
- Properly scoped to specific apiGroups and resources
Consider documenting the purpose of each service in a comment to help future maintainers understand the access requirements.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 4-4: syntax error: expected , but found ''
(syntax)
packages/apps/kafka/templates/dashboard-resourcemap.yaml (1)
6-12: Consider documenting the purpose of service access permissions.While the permissions are correctly configured, adding comments to explain why the dashboard needs access to the Kafka bootstrap service would improve maintainability.
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1 kind: Role metadata: name: {{ .Release.Name }}-dashboard-resources rules: +# Allow dashboard to discover Kafka bootstrap service endpoints - apiGroups: - "" resources: - services
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
packages/apps/clickhouse/Chart.yaml(1 hunks)packages/apps/clickhouse/templates/dashboard-resourcemap.yaml(1 hunks)packages/apps/kafka/Chart.yaml(1 hunks)packages/apps/kafka/templates/dashboard-resourcemap.yaml(1 hunks)packages/apps/nats/Chart.yaml(1 hunks)packages/apps/nats/templates/nats.yaml(1 hunks)packages/apps/nats/templates/resourcemap.yaml(1 hunks)packages/apps/redis/Chart.yaml(1 hunks)packages/apps/redis/templates/dashboard-resourcemap.yaml(1 hunks)packages/apps/versions_map(4 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- packages/apps/clickhouse/Chart.yaml
- packages/apps/kafka/Chart.yaml
- packages/apps/nats/Chart.yaml
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- packages/apps/redis/Chart.yaml
- packages/apps/versions_map
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
packages/apps/kafka/templates/dashboard-resourcemap.yaml
[error] 4-4: syntax error: expected , but found ''
(syntax)
packages/apps/redis/templates/dashboard-resourcemap.yaml
[error] 4-4: syntax error: expected , but found ''
(syntax)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
packages/apps/clickhouse/templates/dashboard-resourcemap.yaml (1)
11-11: LGTM! Good improvement in templating.
The change from a hardcoded service name to a dynamic chendpoint-{{ .Release.Name }} pattern follows Kubernetes best practices for templating and multi-tenant scenarios.
Let's verify that the new service naming pattern matches the actual services:
✅ Verification successful
Service naming pattern is correctly aligned
The verification confirms that:
- The new
chendpoint-pattern is defined inclickhouse.yamlunderserviceTemplateswithgenerateName: chendpoint-{chi} - The old
chi-clickhousepattern is not referenced anywhere in the templates - The service naming is consistently templated using the release name
This change is safe and properly implemented across the ClickHouse templates.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that services follow the new naming pattern
# Check if there are any existing services with the old pattern
rg -l 'chi-clickhouse-.*-clickhouse-\d+-\d+' --type yaml
# Check if the new service naming pattern is consistently used
rg -l 'chendpoint-' --type yaml
# Look for service name definitions in ClickHouse templates
fd -e yaml -e tpl . packages/apps/clickhouse/templates/ --exec grep -l 'name:'
Length of output: 558
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the service name definition in clickhouse.yaml and verify the pattern
cat packages/apps/clickhouse/templates/clickhouse.yaml | grep -A 5 'name:'
# Also check if there are any other references to the old pattern in the templates
rg 'chi-clickhouse' packages/apps/clickhouse/templates/
Length of output: 1655
packages/apps/redis/templates/dashboard-resourcemap.yaml (1)
10-14: Services referenced in Role may be missing from the cluster configuration
The previous review identified that several services referenced in this Role are not defined in the Redis app templates:
- Services with prefixes
rfs-,rfrm-, andrfrs-are not found - Only the
{{ .Release.Name }}-external-lbservice appears to be defined
This could lead to RBAC issues as the Role is granting access to potentially non-existent services.
packages/apps/nats/templates/resourcemap.yaml (1)
6-12: LGTM! The RBAC rule follows security best practices.
The new rule for services access is well-structured with:
- Proper scoping to specific service name
- Read-only permissions following principle of least privilege
- Consistent pattern with existing secret access rule
Let's verify similar implementations across other services mentioned in the summary:
✅ Verification successful
RBAC implementation is consistent across services
The verification confirms that the RBAC implementation for service access is consistent across all applications. The new rule in NATS follows the same pattern found in other services:
- All services use read-only verbs (get, list, watch)
- Each rule is properly scoped to specific service names using Release.Name
- The API group is correctly specified as "" for core resources
- Similar structure combining both service and secret access rules
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify consistent RBAC implementation across Redis, ClickHouse, and Kafka apps
# Check for similar service access rules in other apps
echo "Checking service access rules in other apps..."
for app in redis clickhouse kafka; do
echo "=== Checking $app ==="
fd "resourcemap.yaml" "packages/apps/$app" --exec rg -A 5 "apiGroups.*services"
done
Length of output: 627
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if these files exist and then examine their content
echo "=== Checking existence of resourcemap.yaml files ==="
fd "resourcemap.yaml" "packages/apps/"
echo -e "\n=== Examining content of found files ==="
fd "resourcemap.yaml" "packages/apps/" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 5707
packages/apps/kafka/templates/dashboard-resourcemap.yaml (2)
1-5: LGTM! Role definition follows security best practices.
The Role is properly scoped to specific resources and follows the principle of least privilege.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 4-4: syntax error: expected , but found ''
(syntax)
13-19: Verify if additional permissions are needed for Redis integration.
Since this PR aims to add Redis services to the dashboard, we should verify if similar permissions will be needed for Redis-related resources.
✅ Verification successful
No additional secret permissions needed for Redis integration
The Redis dashboard resource map (packages/apps/redis/templates/dashboard-resourcemap.yaml) already contains the necessary RBAC permissions, which only require access to services. Unlike Kafka, Redis doesn't require access to additional secrets for dashboard operations, as verified by examining both the Redis CRD and dashboard resource definitions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if similar RBAC patterns exist in other dashboard resource files
# and if Redis requires additional permissions
# Look for similar dashboard resource files
echo "Searching for other dashboard resource files..."
fd --type f "dashboard-resourcemap.yaml"
# Check for Redis-related resources that might need dashboard access
echo "Checking for Redis-related resources..."
fd --type f "\.yaml$" --exec grep -l "kind: Redis" {}
Length of output: 1214
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the Redis dashboard resource map for any specific permissions
echo "Checking Redis dashboard resource map permissions..."
cat packages/apps/redis/templates/dashboard-resourcemap.yaml
# Let's also check the Redis operator CRD to understand what resources might need access
echo -e "\nChecking Redis CRD definition..."
cat packages/system/redis-operator/charts/redis-operator/crds/databases.spotahome.com_redisfailovers.yaml | grep -A 5 "kind:"
# Check Redis templates for any secret usage patterns
echo -e "\nChecking Redis templates for secret patterns..."
cat packages/apps/redis/templates/redisfailover.yaml | grep -A 5 "secret"
Length of output: 5261
packages/apps/nats/templates/nats.yaml (2)
Line range hint 1-11: LGTM! Robust password management implementation.
The password management logic is well-implemented with proper handling of both predefined and random passwords. The use of a local dictionary ensures consistent password references throughout the template.
Line range hint 43-51: Verify the accounts configuration impact.
The condition for merging NATS accounts now checks the length of $passwords instead of .Values.passwords. While this is more accurate, we should verify that this change doesn't affect existing NATS clusters during upgrades.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the findings and generate additional verification scripts to better understand the NATS configuration structure and potential upgrade impacts.
This will help us understand:
- How
$passwordsis used throughout the NATS configuration - Any documented version changes or upgrade notes
- Other account configurations that might be impacted by this change
Let me generate one final verification script to understand how $passwords is defined and used in the template context.
This will help us understand the template context and password handling, which is crucial for determining if this is a breaking change.
Based on the analysis of the scripts' output, I can now generate the final response:
The NATS account configuration change is safe for upgrades
The change from .Values.passwords to $passwords is a local template variable refactoring that doesn't affect the underlying account configuration structure. The search results show:
- No other NATS templates depend on this account configuration
- The account structure in
nats.yamlremains consistent with a single account "A" containing users - No breaking changes or upgrade notes related to NATS account configuration
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential breaking changes in NATS account configuration
# Look for any existing account configurations in other NATS-related files
rg -A 5 "accounts:|users:" --type yaml
# Check for any upgrade-related documentation or notes
fd -e md -e txt | xargs rg -i "nats.*upgrade|breaking.*change"
Length of output: 13498
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for NATS configuration patterns and helm chart versioning
# Look for any NATS configuration templates and their usage of passwords/accounts
rg -A 10 "\$passwords" packages/apps/nats/
# Check for any helm chart version changes or upgrade notes
fd "Chart.yaml|CHANGELOG.md|README.md" packages/apps/nats/ | xargs rg -i "version|upgrade|breaking"
# Look for any other NATS account configurations that might be affected
rg -A 5 "accounts:|merge:" packages/apps/nats/
Length of output: 1881
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for password variable definition and usage in templates
# Look for password variable definition and template context
rg -B 10 -A 5 "\{\{- \$passwords :=" packages/apps/nats/
rg -B 5 -A 5 "\.Values\.passwords" packages/apps/nats/
# Check for any template helpers or functions that might process passwords
fd "_helpers.tpl" packages/apps/nats/ | xargs rg "password"
Length of output: 102006
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Version Updates
0.3.0to0.3.1.0.6.0to0.6.1.0.3.0to0.3.1.0.3.0to0.3.1.