-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgrade grafana operator to the latest available version #356
Conversation
Signed-off-by: George Gaál <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThe changes involve significant updates to the Grafana Operator Helm chart, including version increments in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (30)
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/extraobjects.yaml (1)
1-4
: LGTM! Consider adding documentation for this feature.The implementation of
extraobjects.yaml
is a flexible approach to allow users to define custom Kubernetes objects in their Helm values. This enhances the extensibility of the Grafana Operator chart.Consider adding a comment at the top of the file to explain the purpose of this template. For example:
{{/* This template renders additional Kubernetes objects defined in .Values.extraObjects. It allows users to extend the chart with custom resources without modifying the chart itself. */}} {{ range .Values.extraObjects }} --- {{ tpl (toYaml .) $ }} {{ end }}To improve user experience, it's recommended to document this feature in the chart's README.md or values.yaml file. This will help users understand how to utilize the
extraObjects
functionality effectively.Tools
yamllint
[error] 4-4: syntax error: expected '', but found '{'
(syntax)
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/Chart.yaml (1)
18-18
: LGTM. Consider documenting the changes for this chart version bump.The chart version update from 0.1.2 to 0.3.0 is appropriate given the significant update to the Grafana Operator version. This change aligns with the PR objective.
Consider adding a CHANGELOG.md file or updating the existing one (if present) to document the changes introduced in this new chart version. This will help users understand what has changed and any potential impacts on their deployments.
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/servicemonitor.yaml (1)
21-37
: LGTM with a minor suggestion: Endpoints configuration is comprehensive.The endpoints configuration is well-structured and provides good flexibility:
- The metrics port and path are correctly defined.
- Conditional statements for optional configurations (interval, scrapeTimeout, etc.) allow for customization.
Consider adjusting the indentation for
metricRelabelings
andrelabelings
to improve readability:{{- if .Values.serviceMonitor.metricRelabelings }} metricRelabelings: {{- toYaml .Values.serviceMonitor.metricRelabelings | nindent 8 }} {{- end }} {{- if .Values.serviceMonitor.relabelings }} relabelings: {{- toYaml .Values.serviceMonitor.relabelings | nindent 8 }} {{- end }}This change ensures consistent indentation throughout the file.
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/rbac.yaml (3)
4-6
: Good use ofcoalesce
and boolean flags initialization.The logic for setting
$watchNamespaces
and initializing boolean flags is sound. However, there's a minor indentation issue.Consider adjusting the indentation of line 6 to match the surrounding lines:
{{- $watchNamespaces := coalesce .Values.watchNamespaces .Values.namespaceOverride .Release.Namespace }} {{- $namespaceScoped := false }} -{{- $isOpenShift := false }} +{{- $isOpenShift := false }}Tools
yamllint
[warning] 4-4: too many spaces inside braces
(braces)
7-12
: Correct logic for namespace scoping and OpenShift detection.The conditions for setting
$namespaceScoped
and$isOpenShift
are well-defined and cover the necessary scenarios. This allows for flexible deployment across different Kubernetes environments.There's a minor indentation inconsistency. Consider adjusting the indentation of lines 11-12 to match the surrounding code:
{{- if (.Values.isOpenShift) }} - {{- $isOpenShift = true }} -{{- end }} +{{- $isOpenShift = true }} +{{- end }}Tools
yamllint
[warning] 11-11: wrong indentation: expected 0 but found 2
(indentation)
1-11
: Minor YAML formatting improvements suggested.To improve YAML formatting and consistency, please consider the following changes:
- Remove extra spaces inside braces on lines 3 and 4:
-{{ $rbac := .Files.Get "files/rbac.yaml" | fromYaml }} -{{ $rbacOpenShift := .Files.Get "files/rbac-openshift.yaml" | fromYaml }} +{{ $rbac := .Files.Get "files/rbac.yaml" | fromYaml }} +{{ $rbacOpenShift := .Files.Get "files/rbac-openshift.yaml" | fromYaml }}
- Adjust indentation on line 11 (as mentioned in a previous comment).
These changes will improve the overall consistency and readability of the YAML template.
Tools
yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 3-3: too many spaces inside braces
(braces)
[warning] 4-4: too many spaces inside braces
(braces)
[warning] 11-11: wrong indentation: expected 0 but found 2
(indentation)
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/_helpers.tpl (1)
50-53
: LGTM: Label additions improve resource management.The changes to the
grafana-operator.labels
function are beneficial:
- The new
app.kubernetes.io/part-of
label adheres to Kubernetes recommended labels, improving resource organization and querying.- The addition of
additionalLabels
provides flexibility for users to add custom labels.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of
additionalLabels
in thevalues.yaml
file to guide users on its usage.packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/README.md.gotmpl (2)
22-35
: Great addition of Terraform installation instructions!The new "Using Terraform" section is a valuable addition to the documentation. It provides clear instructions and a complete example for users who prefer to manage their infrastructure as code.
Consider adding a brief explanation of why the
verify = false
line is included in the Terraform resource. This might help users understand any potential security implications or reasons for disabling verification.
38-48
: Excellent upgrade instructions and explanations!The expanded "Upgrading" section provides crucial information for users to ensure smooth upgrades. The inclusion of the kubectl command for applying CRD updates and the explanations for the
--server-side
and--force-conflicts
flags are particularly helpful.Consider adding a note recommending that users back up their Grafana resources before applying these changes, especially given the use of the
--force-conflicts
flag. This could help prevent data loss in case of unexpected issues during the upgrade process.packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/deployment.yaml (1)
Line range hint
1-105
: Overall assessment of deployment changesThe changes to the Grafana operator deployment manifest enhance its functionality and flexibility:
- Improved namespace handling and consistent labeling.
- Added capability for more granular namespace watching.
- Introduced pprof profiling for debugging and performance analysis.
These changes are generally positive and align with Kubernetes best practices. However, to ensure the security and proper documentation of these new features, please address the following recommendations:
- Update the README and values.yaml to document the new
WATCH_NAMESPACE_SELECTOR
feature and its configuration options.- Add conditions to enable pprof only when needed, and document security best practices for using pprof in production environments.
- Implement or update NetworkPolicies to restrict access to the pprof port, and ensure any Service exposing this port is properly secured.
By addressing these points, you'll maintain a good balance between enhanced functionality and security for the Grafana operator deployment.
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/values.yaml (1)
103-140
: LGTM: NewserviceMonitor
andextraObjects
sections addedThe addition of the
serviceMonitor
andextraObjects
sections greatly enhances the flexibility and functionality of the Grafana operator Helm chart:
The
serviceMonitor
section provides comprehensive configuration options for Prometheus integration, which is valuable for monitoring the Grafana operator.The
extraObjects
section offers the ability to deploy additional Kubernetes resources, increasing the chart's extensibility.Both sections are well-documented with clear descriptions and examples.
Consider adding a brief comment above the
extraObjects
section explaining its purpose and providing a link to documentation on how to use it effectively. This could help users understand how to leverage this powerful feature.packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/README.md (4)
22-35
: LGTM: Valuable addition of Terraform installation instructions.The new "Using Terraform" section is a great addition, providing clear instructions and a sample configuration for users who prefer to manage their infrastructure as code. This enhances the usability of the Helm chart for a wider audience.
Consider adding a brief explanation of the
verify = false
line in the Terraform configuration, as some users might wonder about its purpose or security implications.
37-47
: LGTM: Crucial upgrade instructions added.The expanded upgrading section provides essential information for ensuring smooth upgrades of the Grafana operator. The addition of the CRD application command and explanations for the
--server-side
and--force-conflicts
flags are particularly valuable.Consider adding a note recommending users to backup their existing CRDs before applying the new ones, as an extra precaution during the upgrade process.
68-69
: LGTM: Valuable new configuration options added.The addition of new configuration options (
extraObjects
,metricsService.pprofPort
,serviceMonitor
, andwatchNamespaceSelector
) significantly enhances the flexibility and functionality of the Helm chart. The updated descriptions for the override options provide clearer explanations.For the
watchNamespaceSelector
option, consider providing a brief example of how to use it, as it might not be immediately clear to all users how to specify the label and key-value pair for namespace selection.Also applies to: 77-77, 79-80, 92-100, 102-102
14-14
: Minor grammatical improvements suggested.
- On line 14, change "a OCI helm chart" to "an OCI helm chart" for correct grammar.
- On line 102, add a comma after "By default" to improve readability.
Also applies to: 102-102
Tools
LanguageTool
[misspelling] ~14-~14: Use “an” instead of ‘a’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ...=flat-square) ## Installation This is a OCI helm chart, helm started support OC...(EN_A_VS_AN)
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/crds/grafana.integreatly.org_grafanacontactpoints.yaml (2)
42-136
: LGTM with a minor suggestion: Comprehensive spec definition for GrafanaContactPoint.The spec definition is well-structured and covers all necessary aspects of a contact point configuration. The immutable instanceSelector, default resyncPeriod with validation, and comprehensive type enum are particularly noteworthy.
Consider adding a brief description for the
settings
field (line 105) to clarify its purpose and expected content, as it usesx-kubernetes-preserve-unknown-fields: true
.
215-219
: LGTM with a future consideration: Proper versioning and subresource definition.The CRD is correctly marked as served and stored for v1beta1, and includes a status subresource for proper status updates.
For future versions, consider implementing a conversion strategy if you plan to introduce new versions of this CRD. This will ensure smooth upgrades and backward compatibility as the API evolves.
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/crds/grafana.integreatly.org_grafanadatasources.yaml (1)
53-53
: LGTM: Improved field descriptions and deprecation notices.The added descriptions for 'spec', 'allowCrossNamespaceImport', and other fields enhance the CRD's documentation. Marking 'editable' and 'orgId' as deprecated is helpful for users.
Consider adding explicit deprecation notices for 'editable' and 'orgId' fields, such as:
editable: description: "Deprecated: This field has no effect and will be removed in a future version." type: booleanThis will make the deprecation more visible to users.
Also applies to: 56-57, 70-70, 80-82
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/crds/grafana.integreatly.org_grafanafolders.yaml (3)
104-120
: LGTM. Consider updating documentation.The changes to the 'spec' section are well-thought-out and improve the functionality and clarity of the CRD:
- The new 'parentFolderRef' and 'parentFolderUID' fields provide more flexibility in folder organization.
- The updated description for the 'permissions' field clarifies its purpose.
- The 'resyncPeriod' field now has a default value and a more detailed description, which is helpful for users.
Consider updating any related documentation or user guides to reflect these changes, especially the new fields and the default resync period.
127-131
: LGTM. Consider clarifying the error message.The addition of the validation rule to ensure that only one of 'parentFolderUID' or 'parentFolderRef' is set is a crucial safeguard against conflicting configurations.
Consider updating the error message to be more specific:
message: "Only one of parentFolderUID or parentFolderRef can be set. Please specify either parentFolderUID or parentFolderRef, but not both."This provides clearer guidance to users on how to correct the configuration if the validation fails.
139-216
: LGTM. Consider clarifying the 'hash' field description.The additions to the 'status' section are well-structured and follow Kubernetes best practices:
- The 'conditions' field provides a standardized way to report the status of the resource.
- The 'hash' and 'lastResync' fields offer useful metadata for tracking the state and last update of the resource.
The description for the 'hash' field (lines 209-211) appears to be a placeholder. Consider updating it to clearly describe the purpose and content of the hash. For example:
description: "A hash representing the current state of the GrafanaFolder resource. This can be used to quickly determine if the resource has changed."packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/crds/grafana.integreatly.org_grafananotificationpolicies.yaml (3)
18-23
: LGTM: Schema definition is well-structured. Consider adding a short description.The schema definition for the CRD is correctly structured:
- Uses v1beta1 as the initial version, which is a good practice for allowing future changes
- Utilizes openAPIV3Schema for proper validation
Consider adding a short description for the v1beta1 version to provide context about its features or intended use. For example:
- name: v1beta1 description: Initial beta version of the GrafanaNotificationPolicy API schema: openAPIV3Schema: description: GrafanaNotificationPolicy is the Schema for the GrafanaNotificationPolicy API
42-176
: LGTM: Comprehensive spec section. Consider enhancing data validation.The spec section of the CRD is well-structured and covers essential aspects of notification policy configuration:
- Flexible instanceSelector for targeting Grafana instances
- Detailed route property for configuring notification routing
- Comprehensive options for matching and grouping alerts
Consider enhancing data validation for some fields:
- Add format validation for duration fields:
group_interval: description: group interval type: string format: duration pattern: ^([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?(ns|us|µs|ms|s|m|h))+$ group_wait: description: group wait type: string format: duration pattern: ^([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?(ns|us|µs|ms|s|m|h))+$
- Add enum validation for the
continue
field:continue: description: continue type: boolean enum: [true, false]These changes will improve the robustness of the CRD and prevent potential configuration errors.
254-257
: LGTM: Proper versioning and subresource definition. Consider adding print columns.The CRD versioning and subresources are correctly defined:
- v1beta1 is appropriately marked as served and stored
- Status subresource is correctly included
Consider adding additional printer columns to improve the output of
kubectl get
commands. For example:additionalPrinterColumns: - name: Status type: string jsonPath: .status.conditions[?(@.type=="Ready")].status - name: Age type: date jsonPath: .metadata.creationTimestampThis addition will make it easier for users to quickly view the status and age of GrafanaNotificationPolicy resources.
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/crds/grafana.integreatly.org_grafanaalertrulegroups.yaml (3)
44-226
: LGTM: Spec section is well-defined with appropriate validations.The spec section for GrafanaAlertRuleGroup is comprehensive and includes necessary fields for configuring alert rule groups. The use of duration formats, immutability constraints, and validation rules (e.g., for folderRef and folderUID) demonstrates attention to detail and adherence to best practices.
Consider adding a minimum length validation for the
rules
array to ensure that at least one rule is defined in each GrafanaAlertRuleGroup. This can be achieved by adding aminItems
property to therules
array definition. For example:rules: type: array minItems: 1 items: # ... existing items definition ...This would prevent the creation of empty alert rule groups, which might not be a desired state.
113-221
: LGTM: AlertRule structure is well-defined with appropriate validations.The AlertRule structure within the rules array is comprehensive and includes necessary fields for defining Grafana alert rules. The use of specific validations, such as title length limits and UID patterns, demonstrates attention to detail.
Consider the following improvements to enhance the robustness of the AlertRule definition:
- Add a description for the
isPaused
field to clarify its purpose.- Consider adding a
maxItems
limit to thedata
array to prevent an excessive number of queries in a single rule.- Add a pattern validation for the
for
duration field, similar to the one used forinterval
andresyncPeriod
.Example for the
for
field validation:for: type: string format: duration pattern: ^([0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?(ns|us|µs|ms|s|m|h))+$These additions would further improve the clarity and integrity of the AlertRule definitions.
231-311
: LGTM: Status section follows Kubernetes conventions for resource status reporting.The status section of the GrafanaAlertRuleGroup CRD is well-structured and adheres to Kubernetes best practices for representing resource status. The use of conditions allows for detailed and standardized reporting of the resource's state.
Consider enhancing the status section with additional fields specific to GrafanaAlertRuleGroup. For example, you could add fields to report:
- The number of successfully applied rules.
- The last successful sync time.
- Any errors encountered during rule application.
Example addition to the status section:
status: description: GrafanaAlertRuleGroupStatus defines the observed state of GrafanaAlertRuleGroup type: object properties: conditions: # ... existing conditions definition ... appliedRulesCount: type: integer description: The number of rules successfully applied to the Grafana instance lastSyncTime: type: string format: date-time description: The last time the rules were successfully synced with the Grafana instance lastSyncError: type: string description: The last error encountered during rule synchronization, if any required: - conditionsThese additional fields would provide more detailed insights into the current state of the GrafanaAlertRuleGroup resource.
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/crds/grafana.integreatly.org_grafanadashboards.yaml (3)
Line range hint
229-402
: New fields enhance dashboard configuration options.The additions of
folderRef
,folderUID
, andurlAuthorization
provide more granular control over dashboard organization and security. The enhanced descriptions improve the overall clarity of the CRD.Consider updating the user documentation to reflect these new configuration options and their use cases.
Line range hint
422-502
: Status section improvements enhance observability.The addition of
conditions
andlastResync
fields in the status section, along with the detailed Condition type, significantly improves the observability and debugging capabilities of the GrafanaDashboard resource.Consider integrating these new status fields with your monitoring and alerting systems to provide better visibility into the health and state of GrafanaDashboards across your cluster.
Line range hint
1-512
: Comprehensive update to GrafanaDashboard CRD.This update significantly enhances the GrafanaDashboard CustomResourceDefinition with new fields, improved validations, and more detailed descriptions. These changes align well with the PR objective of upgrading the Grafana operator and should improve the overall functionality and user experience.
As next steps, consider:
- Updating related documentation to reflect these changes.
- Reviewing and updating any client code that interacts with this CRD to ensure compatibility with the new fields and validations.
- Checking if similar updates are needed for other related CRDs in the Grafana operator.
- Planning for a testing phase to ensure these changes work as expected in various scenarios.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (20)
- packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/Chart.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/README.md (2 hunks)
- packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/README.md.gotmpl (2 hunks)
- packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/crds/grafana.integreatly.org_grafanaalertrulegroups.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/crds/grafana.integreatly.org_grafanacontactpoints.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/crds/grafana.integreatly.org_grafanadashboards.yaml (9 hunks)
- packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/crds/grafana.integreatly.org_grafanadatasources.yaml (7 hunks)
- packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/crds/grafana.integreatly.org_grafanafolders.yaml (2 hunks)
- packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/crds/grafana.integreatly.org_grafananotificationpolicies.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/files/rbac-openshift.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/files/rbac.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/_helpers.tpl (2 hunks)
- packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/cm.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/deployment.yaml (4 hunks)
- packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/extraobjects.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/rbac.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/service.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/serviceaccount.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/servicemonitor.yaml (1 hunks)
- packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/values.yaml (4 hunks)
Additional context used
LanguageTool
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/README.md
[misspelling] ~14-~14: Use “an” instead of ‘a’ if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. ‘an article’, ‘an hour’.
Context: ...=flat-square) ## Installation This is a OCI helm chart, helm started support OC...(EN_A_VS_AN)
[uncategorized] ~19-~19: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...grafana-operator --version v5.13.0 ``` Sadly helm OCI charts currently don't support...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~102-~102: Did you mean: “By default,”?
Context: ...key value pair added on namespace kind. By default it's all namespaces. | | watchNamespace...(BY_DEFAULT_COMMA)
Markdownlint
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/README.md
97-97: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
yamllint
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/deployment.yaml
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[error] 7-7: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/extraobjects.yaml
[error] 4-4: syntax error: expected '', but found '{'
(syntax)
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/rbac.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 3-3: too many spaces inside braces
(braces)
[warning] 4-4: too many spaces inside braces
(braces)
[warning] 11-11: wrong indentation: expected 0 but found 2
(indentation)
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/service.yaml
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/servicemonitor.yaml
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
Additional comments not posted (67)
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/files/rbac-openshift.yaml (3)
1-18
: LGTM: YAML structure is correct and follows best practices.The YAML structure for this ClusterRole definition is well-formatted and adheres to Kubernetes resource definition standards.
3-5
: Consider the security implications of a cluster-scoped role.The
ClusterRole
grants permissions cluster-wide, which could potentially be a security concern if the associated service account is compromised.Please consider the following:
- Is it possible to limit the scope of these permissions to specific namespaces where the Grafana operator will be deployed?
- If cluster-wide permissions are absolutely necessary, ensure that proper security measures are in place to protect the associated service account.
To help verify the necessity of cluster-wide permissions, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify any existing justifications for cluster-wide permissions and potential usage of namespace-specific operations related to routes.
6-18
: Verify the necessity of granted permissions and document their purpose.The ClusterRole grants broad permissions (create, delete, get, list, update, watch) for OpenShift routes. While these may be necessary for the Grafana operator to function in an OpenShift environment, it's important to ensure that:
- All these permissions are indeed required for the operator's functionality.
- The scope of these permissions is not overly broad.
Please confirm that all these permissions are necessary. Additionally, consider adding comments or documentation explaining why these specific permissions are required for the Grafana operator in an OpenShift environment.
To help verify the usage of these permissions, you can run the following script:
This script will help identify where and how these OpenShift route permissions are being used in the codebase.
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/serviceaccount.yaml (3)
6-6
: Improved namespace assignment flexibilityThe change from using the release namespace directly to utilizing the
{{ include "grafana-operator.namespace" . }}
template function enhances flexibility in namespace assignment. This modification aligns well with the upgrade objective and potentially supports multi-namespace deployments, which is a valuable improvement.
9-9
: Enhanced resource identification with recommended labelThe addition of the
app.kubernetes.io/component: operator
label follows the Kubernetes recommended label schema. This improvement provides more precise identification of the resource's role within the application, which is beneficial for resource management and querying. It's a positive change that aligns with best practices.
Line range hint
1-15
: LGTM: ServiceAccount template improvementsThe changes to the ServiceAccount template align well with the PR objective of upgrading the Grafana operator. The improved namespace assignment and the addition of the recommended Kubernetes label enhance the flexibility and manageability of the deployed resources. These modifications contribute positively to the overall upgrade process.
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/cm.yaml (3)
6-6
: LGTM: Improved namespace definitionThe use of the
grafana-operator.namespace
template function for setting the namespace is a good improvement. It centralizes the namespace logic, making the chart more maintainable and consistent.
8-8
: LGTM: Enhanced label managementThe use of the
grafana-operator.labels
template function for setting the labels is a good improvement. It centralizes the label logic, ensuring consistency across the chart and simplifying future updates.
9-9
: LGTM: Added informative Kubernetes-recommended labelThe addition of the
app.kubernetes.io/component: operator
label is a good practice. It follows the recommended Kubernetes labeling conventions and provides more specific information about the resource. This label will be useful for filtering and organizing resources in larger deployments.packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/service.yaml (3)
5-5
: LGTM: Improved namespace assignmentThe use of the
grafana-operator.namespace
template function for namespace assignment is a good practice. It enhances flexibility and consistency across the chart, allowing for dynamic namespace setting.
8-8
: LGTM: Added recommended Kubernetes labelThe addition of the
app.kubernetes.io/component: operator
label follows Kubernetes recommended practices for labeling. This improves resource identification and potential use in selectors.Note: The indentation warning from the static analysis tool appears to be a false positive. The current indentation is correct for a Helm chart template, where additional indentation is often used for readability in the final rendered YAML.
Tools
yamllint
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
16-19
: LGTM with suggestions: Added pprof port configurationThe addition of a pprof port is beneficial for profiling and debugging the Grafana operator. The use of
.Values.metricsService.pprofPort
allows for flexible configuration.However, please consider the following:
- Ensure that exposing the pprof port doesn't introduce any security risks, especially in production environments.
- Update the chart's documentation to explain the purpose of this port and any security considerations.
- Consider adding a conditional statement to only expose this port when explicitly enabled, to minimize potential security exposure.
To ensure proper documentation, please run the following script:
Verification successful
LGTM with suggestions: Added pprof port configuration
The
pprof
port is properly documented in bothvalues.yaml
andREADME.md
, ensuring clarity for configuration and security considerations.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if pprof port is documented in README or values.yaml # Test: Search for pprof documentation rg --type yaml -i 'pprof' packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/values.yaml rg -i 'pprof' packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/README.mdLength of output: 322
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/Chart.yaml (1)
24-24
: LGTM. Ensure compatibility and review new features.The application version update from v5.6.0 to v5.13.0 aligns with the PR objective of upgrading the Grafana operator to the latest available version.
Please review the Grafana Operator changelog for versions v5.7.0 through v5.13.0 to ensure:
- There are no breaking changes that need to be addressed.
- Any new features or configurations that might be beneficial to enable.
You can use the following script to fetch the changelog:
After reviewing the changelog, update the README.md and values.yaml files if necessary to reflect any important changes or new configurations.
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/servicemonitor.yaml (5)
1-4
: LGTM! Conditional creation and resource definition are correct.The conditional statement for creating the ServiceMonitor and the resource definition are well-structured. The
apiVersion
andkind
are correctly specified for a ServiceMonitor resource.Note: The syntax error reported by yamllint on line 1 is a false positive. This is a common occurrence with Helm templates due to the conditional statement at the beginning of the file, which is a valid and recommended pattern.
Tools
yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
4-12
: LGTM! Metadata section is well-structured and comprehensive.The metadata section is correctly implemented:
- The use of template functions for name and namespace ensures consistency across the Helm chart.
- Labels are comprehensive, including standard labels, a specific component label, and support for additional custom labels.
- The YAML structure and indentation are correct.
13-20
: LGTM! Spec section start and selector configuration are correct.The spec section is well-configured:
- The jobLabel is appropriately set to the release name, aiding in job identification in Prometheus.
- The namespaceSelector correctly targets the release namespace.
- The selector uses the appropriate template function to include standard labels, ensuring consistency with other resources.
38-44
: LGTM! TargetLabels section is well-implemented.The targetLabels section is correctly implemented:
- Conditional inclusion based on
.Values.serviceMonitor.targetLabels
provides flexibility.- The range loop properly iterates over the targetLabels, adding each one correctly.
- The indentation and structure are appropriate.
1-44
: Great addition! ServiceMonitor implementation aligns well with PR objectives.This new ServiceMonitor resource for the Grafana operator is well-implemented and aligns perfectly with the PR objective of upgrading the Grafana operator. Key points:
- The file makes excellent use of Helm templating, providing flexibility and customization options.
- The structure follows Kubernetes and Prometheus Operator conventions, ensuring compatibility and ease of use.
- Conditional creation and extensive use of values allow for easy configuration in different environments.
The implementation demonstrates a good understanding of both Helm chart best practices and ServiceMonitor requirements. This addition will greatly enhance the monitoring capabilities of the Grafana operator in the upgraded version.
Tools
yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/rbac.yaml (4)
1-3
: Excellent modularization of RBAC configurations!The introduction of conditional RBAC creation and loading configurations from external YAML files significantly improves the modularity and maintainability of the Helm chart. This approach allows for easier updates and customizations of RBAC rules in the future.
Tools
yamllint
[error] 1-1: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
[warning] 3-3: too many spaces inside braces
(braces)
13-30
: Excellent dynamic role configuration!The changes in this section greatly improve the flexibility and maintainability of the RBAC configuration:
- The loop over
$watchNamespaces
allows for multi-namespace deployments.- Dynamic selection between Role and ClusterRole based on
$namespaceScoped
.- Use of
grafana-operator.fullname
for consistent and conflict-free naming.- Loading rules from external YAML files improves maintainability.
- Conditional inclusion of OpenShift-specific rules.
These improvements make the chart more adaptable to different Kubernetes environments and easier to maintain.
31-49
: Well-structured and consistent RoleBinding configuration.The RoleBinding (or ClusterRoleBinding) configuration mirrors the structure of the Role definition, which is excellent for consistency and readability. Key improvements include:
- Dynamic selection between RoleBinding and ClusterRoleBinding.
- Consistent use of
grafana-operator.fullname
for naming.- Proper use of
grafana-operator.serviceAccountName
andgrafana-operator.namespace
for flexibility.This consistent approach ensures that the RBAC configuration remains coherent and easy to understand.
50-51
: Proper closure of conditional blocks.The conditional blocks are correctly closed, maintaining the overall structure of the template.
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/_helpers.tpl (1)
26-31
: LGTM: New namespace override function looks good.The new
grafana-operator.namespace
function is a valuable addition. It provides flexibility in namespace management, allowing users to override the release namespace if needed. The implementation is concise and follows Helm best practices.packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/README.md.gotmpl (2)
10-10
: Verify the removal of the version badge.The version badge template has been removed from this line. While this might reduce redundancy, please ensure that the version information is still easily accessible elsewhere in the documentation. Consider adding a note explaining where users can find the current version information if it's not immediately apparent.
49-49
: Clear explanation of the--force-conflict
flag.This additional explanation provides valuable context for users about the implications of using the
--force-conflict
flag. It clearly states that this allows kubectl to modify fields previously managed by Helm, which is important for users to understand.packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/deployment.yaml (4)
5-8
: Improved namespace handling and labelingThe changes in this section enhance the deployment configuration:
- Using the
grafana-operator.namespace
template function for the namespace provides better flexibility and consistency.- Adding the
app.kubernetes.io/component: operator
label follows Kubernetes best practices for resource labeling.These modifications improve the overall manageability and identification of the Grafana operator resources.
Tools
yamllint
[warning] 8-8: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 4
(indentation)
[error] 7-7: syntax error: expected the node content, but found '-'
(syntax)
21-22
: Consistent pod labelingThe pod template labels have been updated to match the deployment labels, including the
app.kubernetes.io/component: operator
label. This change:
- Ensures consistency between the deployment and pod labels.
- Follows Kubernetes best practices for resource labeling.
This modification improves the overall consistency and manageability of the Grafana operator resources.
60-60
: Added pprof profiling capabilityA new container argument has been added to enable pprof profiling:
- --pprof-addr=0.0.0.0:{{ .Values.metricsService.pprofPort }}
This addition:
- Enables pprof profiling for the Grafana operator, which can be useful for debugging and performance analysis.
- Uses a configurable port from the chart's values, allowing for customization.
While this feature can be beneficial for debugging, it's important to ensure it's used securely. Please verify the following:
- Check if the pprof port is exposed only when necessary:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there's a condition for enabling pprof rg -i "pprofPort" packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/values.yaml
- Ensure the documentation mentions security considerations for using pprof in production:
#!/bin/bash # Check if pprof is mentioned in the README along with security considerations rg -i "pprof.*security" packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/README.mdIf these checks don't yield appropriate results, consider adding a condition to enable pprof only when needed and update the documentation with security best practices for using pprof in production environments.
48-53
: New environment variable for namespace selectionA new environment variable
WATCH_NAMESPACE_SELECTOR
has been added with conditional logic for its value. This enhancement:
- Provides more granular control over which namespaces the Grafana operator watches.
- Uses conditional logic to set the appropriate value based on the chart's configuration.
This addition improves the flexibility of the operator's namespace watching capabilities.
To ensure this new feature is properly documented, please run the following command:
If the command doesn't return any results, consider updating the documentation to explain this new feature and its configuration options.
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/values.yaml (6)
13-16
: LGTM: NewwatchNamespaceSelector
parameter addedThe new
watchNamespaceSelector
parameter provides more granular control over which namespaces the Grafana operator monitors. The description is clear and explains its purpose well.
18-19
: LGTM: NewisOpenShift
parameter addedThe
isOpenShift
parameter is a useful addition for OpenShift-specific configurations. It's set tofalse
by default, which is appropriate for non-OpenShift environments. The description clearly explains its purpose and the implications of setting it totrue
.
40-45
: LGTM:nameOverride
andfullnameOverride
parameters addedThe addition of
nameOverride
andfullnameOverride
parameters provides flexibility in naming the chart and the fully qualified app name. This can be particularly useful in complex deployment scenarios or when integrating with existing naming conventions.
46-47
: LGTM:namespaceOverride
parameter addedThe
namespaceOverride
parameter is a valuable addition, allowing users to specify a custom namespace for deployment. This flexibility can be crucial in multi-tenant environments or when adhering to specific namespace naming conventions.
58-61
: LGTM: Newrbac
section addedThe new
rbac
section is a valuable addition, providing control over the creation of RBAC resources. The description clearly explains the conditions under which Role and RoleBinding will be created instead of cluster-wide resources. This flexibility is crucial for adapting to different security requirements and cluster configurations.
68-69
: LGTM:pprofPort
parameter added tometricsService
sectionThe addition of the
pprofPort
parameter in themetricsService
section is a useful feature for debugging and performance analysis. The default port (8888) is a commonly used one for pprof, making it a sensible choice.packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/files/rbac.yaml (8)
1-22
: LGTM: Core Kubernetes resource permissions are appropriate.The ClusterRole "manager-role" is correctly defined with necessary permissions for core Kubernetes resources. These broad permissions are essential for the Grafana operator to manage Grafana instances and related resources effectively.
23-44
: LGTM: Event and deployment permissions are well-defined.The permissions for events and deployments are appropriate for the Grafana operator's functionality. Event permissions allow for proper logging and monitoring, while deployment permissions enable full management of Grafana deployments.
45-56
: LGTM: Lease permissions are correctly defined.The permissions for leases in the coordination.k8s.io API group are appropriate. These are typically used for leader election in operators, ensuring high availability and proper functioning of the Grafana operator.
57-134
: LGTM: Grafana custom resource permissions (Part 1) are comprehensive.The permissions for grafanaalertrulegroups, grafanacontactpoints, and grafanadashboards are well-defined. Full CRUD permissions, including finalizer and status subresource management, are granted, which is essential for proper lifecycle management of these Grafana-specific custom resources.
135-212
: LGTM: Grafana custom resource permissions (Part 2) are well-defined.The permissions for grafanadatasources, grafanafolders, and grafananotificationpolicies are correctly specified. Full CRUD permissions, including finalizer and status subresource management, are granted, ensuring comprehensive management of these Grafana-specific custom resources.
213-238
: LGTM: Main Grafana custom resource permissions are appropriate.The permissions for the 'grafanas' custom resource are correctly defined. Full CRUD permissions, including finalizer and status subresource management, are granted. These permissions are crucial for managing the main Grafana instances and are consistent with the permissions for other Grafana custom resources.
239-250
: LGTM: Networking resource permissions are correctly specified.The permissions for ingresses in the networking.k8s.io API group are appropriately defined. Full CRUD permissions are granted, allowing the Grafana operator to create and manage network access to Grafana instances effectively.
1-250
: Overall, the ClusterRole is well-defined and appropriate for the Grafana operator.The ClusterRole "manager-role" provides a comprehensive set of permissions necessary for the Grafana operator to function effectively. It covers all required resources, including core Kubernetes resources, Grafana-specific custom resources, and networking resources. The permissions are consistently defined and follow the principle of least privilege while still ensuring the operator has the necessary access to manage Grafana instances and related components.
Key points:
- Appropriate permissions for core Kubernetes resources
- Comprehensive management of Grafana custom resources
- Necessary access for networking and leader election
- Consistent handling of finalizers and status subresources
The RBAC configuration appears to be secure and well-structured, providing a solid foundation for the Grafana operator's functionality.
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/README.md (2)
10-10
: LGTM: Version badge updated correctly.The AppVersion badge has been updated to v5.13.0, which aligns with the PR objective of upgrading the Grafana operator to the latest available version.
17-17
: LGTM: Installation command updated correctly.The installation command has been updated to use version v5.13.0, which is consistent with the version badge update and ensures users install the latest version of the Grafana operator.
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/crds/grafana.integreatly.org_grafanacontactpoints.yaml (3)
1-17
: LGTM: CRD metadata and basic structure are well-defined.The Custom Resource Definition for GrafanaContactPoint is correctly structured with appropriate metadata. The resource is properly scoped as Namespaced, which is suitable for managing contact points within specific namespaces.
18-41
: LGTM: Standard Kubernetes resource fields are correctly defined.The schema for apiVersion, kind, and metadata follows the OpenAPI v3 format and includes comprehensive descriptions with references to Kubernetes documentation. This ensures compatibility with standard Kubernetes practices.
137-214
: LGTM: Well-defined status structure following Kubernetes best practices.The status definition for GrafanaContactPoint adheres to Kubernetes best practices. It includes a comprehensive conditions array with properly defined properties such as lastTransitionTime, message, observedGeneration, reason, status, and type. The use of enums, length validations, and pattern checks ensures data integrity and consistency.
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/crds/grafana.integreatly.org_grafanadatasources.yaml (6)
11-12
: LGTM: Addition of categories improves resource organization.The addition of the "grafana-operator" category is appropriate and will enhance the organization and discoverability of Grafana-related resources.
36-40
: LGTM: Enhanced descriptions for apiVersion and kind.The added descriptions for 'apiVersion' and 'kind' fields provide clear explanations and follow Kubernetes conventions. This improves the CRD's documentation and usability.
Also applies to: 43-48
96-96
: LGTM: Enhanced instanceSelector documentation and validation.The detailed descriptions added for 'instanceSelector' and its sub-fields greatly improve the understanding of this complex field. The addition of x-kubernetes-validations to ensure immutability is a good practice for maintaining consistency.
Also applies to: 99-137, 141-143
145-145
: LGTM: Improved documentation for plugins and resyncPeriod.The added description for 'plugins' and the enhancements to 'resyncPeriod' (including default value, description, and format constraints) improve the usability of these fields. The pattern for 'resyncPeriod' ensures that only valid duration strings are accepted, which is a good practice.
Also applies to: 158-162
165-165
: LGTM: Enhanced documentation for valuesFrom section.The added descriptions for 'valuesFrom' and its sub-fields (configMapKeyRef and secretKeyRef) provide clear explanations on how to reference ConfigMaps and Secrets. These changes follow Kubernetes conventions and significantly improve the CRD's documentation and usability.
Also applies to: 173-191, 198-217
234-234
: LGTM: Improved status field documentation.The added descriptions for the 'status' field and its sub-fields ('NoMatchingInstances' and 'lastResync') provide clear explanations of their purposes. This enhances the observability and understanding of the GrafanaDatasource's state.
Also applies to: 237-238, 245-246
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/crds/grafana.integreatly.org_grafanafolders.yaml (3)
6-6
: LGTM. Verify compatibility with the rest of the system.The controller-gen version has been updated from v0.12.0 to v0.14.0. This update likely includes new features and bug fixes.
Please ensure that this version is compatible with other components in the system. You may want to check the changelog for any breaking changes or new features that might affect your setup.
11-12
: LGTM. Good addition for resource organization.The addition of the 'categories' field with 'grafana-operator' as its value is a good practice. This helps in organizing and filtering Custom Resource Definitions, making it easier for operators and administrators to manage resources related to the Grafana operator.
Line range hint
1-222
: Overall, excellent updates to the GrafanaFolder CRD.The changes in this file significantly enhance the GrafanaFolder CustomResourceDefinition:
- The controller-gen version has been updated.
- New fields have been added to improve folder organization and management.
- Descriptions have been enhanced for better clarity.
- Validation rules have been added to prevent misconfigurations.
- The status section has been expanded to provide more detailed and standardized status reporting.
These updates align well with Kubernetes best practices and should improve the usability and robustness of the Grafana operator. Great job on these improvements!
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/crds/grafana.integreatly.org_grafananotificationpolicies.yaml (3)
1-17
: LGTM: CRD structure and metadata are well-defined.The Custom Resource Definition (CRD) for GrafanaNotificationPolicy is correctly structured and follows Kubernetes best practices:
- Uses the appropriate API version (apiextensions.k8s.io/v1)
- Properly defines the resource in the grafana.integreatly.org group
- Uses consistent naming conventions
- Correctly sets the scope to Namespaced, which is suitable for managing notification policies within specific namespaces
177-252
: LGTM: Well-defined status section following Kubernetes best practices.The status section of the CRD is correctly structured and adheres to Kubernetes best practices:
- Includes a conditions array for detailed state reporting
- Follows the standard Kubernetes condition format with fields like type, status, reason, and message
- Provides comprehensive metadata for each condition, including lastTransitionTime and observedGeneration
This structure will allow for effective monitoring and troubleshooting of GrafanaNotificationPolicy resources.
1-257
: Overall, excellent CRD implementation for GrafanaNotificationPolicy.This Custom Resource Definition (CRD) for GrafanaNotificationPolicy is well-structured, comprehensive, and adheres to Kubernetes best practices. It provides a solid foundation for managing Grafana notification policies within a Kubernetes environment.
Key strengths:
- Clear and consistent structure
- Comprehensive spec section covering essential notification policy configurations
- Well-defined status section for effective resource state reporting
- Proper versioning and subresource management
The suggested improvements are minor and focus on enhancing data validation and usability. Implementing these suggestions will further improve the robustness and user-friendliness of the CRD.
Great job on creating this CRD! It will significantly contribute to the effective management of Grafana notification policies in Kubernetes environments.
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/crds/grafana.integreatly.org_grafanaalertrulegroups.yaml (3)
1-20
: LGTM: CRD metadata and basic structure are well-defined.The Custom Resource Definition (CRD) for GrafanaAlertRuleGroup is correctly structured with appropriate API version, kind, and metadata. The use of apiextensions.k8s.io/v1 indicates compliance with the latest CRD specification. The namespaced scope and inclusion in the grafana.integreatly.org API group are appropriate for this resource type.
21-43
: LGTM: OpenAPIV3Schema structure is well-defined and follows Kubernetes standards.The schema correctly defines the structure for a Kubernetes custom resource, including standard fields like apiVersion, kind, and metadata. The inclusion of both spec and status fields is crucial for defining the desired state and observing the current state of the GrafanaAlertRuleGroup resource.
1-311
: Overall: Well-structured CRD ready for production use with minor improvement suggestions.This Custom Resource Definition (CRD) for GrafanaAlertRuleGroup is well-designed, adhering to Kubernetes best practices and providing a comprehensive structure for managing Grafana alert rule groups. The CRD includes appropriate validations, follows standard Kubernetes patterns for spec and status sections, and provides detailed configurations for alert rules.
While the CRD is ready for production use as-is, we've suggested a few minor improvements that could enhance its robustness and usability:
- Adding a minimum length validation for the
rules
array.- Enhancing the AlertRule structure with additional validations and descriptions.
- Expanding the status section with GrafanaAlertRuleGroup-specific fields.
These suggestions are not critical but could provide additional value in terms of data integrity and observability. Consider implementing them in a future iteration of the CRD.
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/crds/grafana.integreatly.org_grafanadashboards.yaml (4)
6-6
: Controller-gen version update looks good.The update from v0.12.0 to v0.14.0 is a positive change, likely including bug fixes and improvements. Keeping tools up-to-date is a good practice.
11-12
: Addition of categories enhances resource organization.The new 'categories' field with "grafana-operator" improves the discoverability and organization of this custom resource within the Kubernetes ecosystem.
Line range hint
1-512
: Improved CRD structure and formatting.The overall structure of the CRD has been significantly expanded with more detailed descriptions, improving readability and understanding. The consistent formatting throughout the file will aid in future maintenance and updates.
406-414
: New validations improve resource consistency.The added validations for folder-related fields prevent conflicting configurations, ensuring that users correctly utilize the new
folderUID
andfolderRef
fields in relation to the existingfolder
field.To ensure these validations work as expected, consider adding the following test cases:
These test cases will help verify that the CRD validations are working correctly for various combinations of folder-related fields.
packages/system/grafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/templates/deployment.yaml
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...rafana-operator/charts/grafana-operator/crds/grafana.integreatly.org_grafanadatasources.yaml
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
watchNamespaceSelector
,isOpenShift
, andnamespaceOverride
.Documentation
Bug Fixes