Skip to content

matrix-js-sdk subject to user spoofing via Olm/Megolm protocol confusion

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Sep 28, 2022 in matrix-org/matrix-js-sdk • Updated Jan 30, 2023

Package

npm matrix-js-sdk (npm)

Affected versions

< 19.7.0

Patched versions

19.7.0

Description

Impact

An attacker cooperating with a malicious homeserver can construct messages that legitimately appear to have come from another person, without any indication such as a grey shield.

Additionally, a sophisticated attacker cooperating with a malicious homeserver could employ this vulnerability to perform a targeted attack in order to send fake to-device messages appearing to originate from another user. This can allow, for example, to inject the key backup secret during a self-verification, to make a targeted device start using a malicious key backup spoofed by the homeserver.

These attacks are possible due to a protocol confusion vulnerability that accepts to-device messages encrypted with Megolm instead of Olm.

Patches

matrix-js-sdk has been modified to only accept Olm-encrypted to-device messages.

Out of caution, several other checks have been audited or added:

  • Cleartext m.room_key, m.forwarded_room_key and m.secret.send to_device messages are discarded.
  • Secrets received from untrusted devices are discarded.
  • Key backups are only usable if they have a valid signature from a trusted device (no more local trust, or trust-on-decrypt).
  • The origin of a to-device message should only be determined by observing the Olm session which managed to decrypt the message, and not by using claimed sender_key, user_id, or any other fields controllable by the homeserver.

Workarounds

As this attack requires coordination between a malicious home server and an attacker, if you trust your home server no particular workaround is needed. Notice that the backup spoofing attack is a particularly sophisticated targeted attack.

We are not aware of this attack being used in the wild, though specifying a false positive-free way of noticing malicious key backups key is challenging.

As an abundance of caution, to avoid malicious backup attacks, you should not verify your new logins using emoji/QR verifications methods until patched. Prefer verifying with your security passphrase instead.

References

Blog post: https://matrix.org/blog/2022/09/28/upgrade-now-to-address-encryption-vulns-in-matrix-sdks-and-clients

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, e-mail us at [email protected].

References

@dkasak dkasak published to matrix-org/matrix-js-sdk Sep 28, 2022
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Sep 28, 2022
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Sep 30, 2022
Reviewed Sep 30, 2022
Last updated Jan 30, 2023

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N

EPSS score

0.116%
(47th percentile)

CVE ID

CVE-2022-39251

GHSA ID

GHSA-r48r-j8fx-mq2c
Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.