Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release report summary showing in-accurate report from previous run ? #4838

Closed
andrew-m-leonard opened this issue Oct 27, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Comments

@andrew-m-leonard
Copy link
Contributor

Running a release report summary on http://20.90.182.165/releaseSummary?parentId=653a8b3a20748f006f9329f2&buildName=release-openjdk17-pipeline #46

Showed the following, however none of the sign_* and create_installer_windows had failed, they had failed in the previous run of this job, so it seems it's picking up the previous run or from some cache of the previous result? is this correct? :

Release Summary Report for release-openjdk17-pipeline

Report generated at: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 08:54:36 GMT

TRSS Build and TRSS Grid View
Jenkins Build URL https://ci.adoptium.net/job/build-scripts/job/release-openjdk17-pipeline/46/
Started by upstream project "build-scripts/utils/releaseTrigger_jdk17u" build number 3054 at 26/10/2023, 16:45:12


create_installer_windows ❌ undefined ❌

jdk17u-release-windows-x86-32-temurin ⚠️ UNSTABLE ⚠️

sign_build ❌ undefined ❌

sign_installer ❌ undefined ❌

sign_temurin_gpg ❌ undefined ❌


Test_openjdk17_hs_extended.openjdk_x86-32_windows ⚠️ UNSTABLE ⚠️

Test_openjdk17_hs_extended.openjdk_x86-32_windows_testList_0 ⚠️ UNSTABLE ⚠️
jdk_tools_2 => deep history 7/20 passed | possible issues
jvm_compiler_2 => deep history 0/25 passed | possible issues

@smlambert
Copy link
Contributor

This is because the functional ID used to query Jenkins does not have access to those jobs. Please see adoptium/ci-jenkins-pipelines#236

I will close this issue as a dup of ci-jenkins-pipelines/issues/236

@smlambert smlambert closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants