-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 118
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create an 'adopters' page #1565
Comments
I am asking Eclipse Webdev team about this. cc: @chrisguindon |
Thanks Carmen. We likely need to request that adoptium is added to the working_group attribute mentioned here. For the 2 paths described from the iot and ecdtools examples, both appear to require the potential adopter to have an Eclipse account. Neither path offers a self-serve way for adopters to include a testimonial. Path 1: Raise an issue at: Path 2: Create a PR at: We can offer a self-serve model, but smooth out the experience for potential adopters, and additionally, request the optional testimonial field. Perhaps we have a 3rd path (a shim layer, that let's us ask for the optional testimonial and absolves our adopters from needing to create an Eclipse account or a PR). [Proposed] Path 3: Information needed by Eclipse Foundation (pulled from the gitlab issue template):
Looks like once the EF adopters repository is updated, it can be embedded on our website via |
How-to from @chrisguindon The second use case, which I believe is the one you are interested in, are WGs that wish to display the logo of adopters from projects that the WG is interested in. What is required for the WG website?
About testimonials: |
More than happy to help with the implementation of this |
@CarmenDelgadoEclipse we won't need help from the Eclipse web dev team to create a testimonials page for Adoptium, since we manage our own website dev and are able to integrate such a feature into the existing technology seamlessly. So at this point we are waiting on the EF marketing folks to provide some words, attributions, and logos that we can use. p.s. Courtesy of gdams, here's a link to the testimonials page we had for AdoptOpenJDK that we didn't bring across to Eclipse (to ensure that we start with the required approvals for Adoptium usage). |
@tellison We agreed with the marketing team to first a "draft" project and how-to to prepare the campaign with the possible first adopters. That is why the first step was confirming the tech steps with Webdev team. |
Some notes after today's Marketing committee:
|
Pending the how-to for the submission process: Add a checkbox for multiple selections of why they are using Temurin and a small testimonial, and if they want to share it publicly or not (GDPR) (writing @smlambert suggestion :)) |
Hello more information for the how-to page, We do need to make sure to include acceptable logo format information, similar to the text here: https://ecdtools.eclipse.org/adopters/get-listed/ |
@chrisguindon In the meantime, George updates the design comments. |
yeah that's all good, essentially we should be ready to open up the API |
@gdams did you have the chance to review these comments: |
@gdams to properly request the API needed for the Adopter page (specifying what the Adoptium's Adopter page needs), @chrisguindon suggested creating an issue on this board https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/it/api/eclipsefdn-project-adopters/-/issues. |
It's not very clear to me what's needed from Adopitum. From what I can tell from this issue, the request was mostly discussed in a meeting. I don't have enough details to provide guidance but I am going to try based on what I think is being requested... If I am assuming correctly, Adoptium would like to request that we create a new endpoint for our Adopters API to enable users to upload images. If this is correct, I am not convinced this is something we can easily do. Background: The main reason we ask people to use Gitlab to submit their logo is that we want a public record that the logo was provided by an employee of the organization or someone acting on behalf of that organization to ensure that they give us permission to use it in our project. We don't allow unaffiliated users to upload logos that they don't own. Also, by creating an issue or an MR, enables us to review and test the new images before it's deployed. If a new proposal is made, we need to ensure that we can still do all of these things. With that said, The community can request new features by creating an issue against the eclipsefdn-project-adopters project: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/it/api/eclipsefdn-project-adopters/-/issues. Please provide as much information as you can. We will be able to discuss the request further via that new issue. |
Also, just to set expectations: This is not a project we can prioritize in the short term. I would recommend that we focus on moving this forward without this API feature request as a blocker. I would recommend including a direct link to our Project Adopter Request template on the Adoptium website: https://gitlab.eclipse.org/eclipsefdn/it/api/eclipsefdn-project-adopters/-/issues/new?issuable_template=adopter_request |
I just spoke with @gdams on Slack and my assumptions were incorrect. There is no need for any new requests, the Adoptium WG needs us to confirm how the existing API works. Here's my answer to that question: There are 2 things to consider for this to work.
For example, let's look up Eclipse AQAvit™ https://projects.eclipse.org/api/projects/adoptium.aqavit.json
To summarize, if an organization adds a logo and |
Hello, after today's marketing meeting, some pending tasks update:
New Due date: The first week of June |
Mentioned in #1253, we would like to create a page where we gather testimonials and logos from a broad range of our adopters (in similar fashion to https://ecdtools.eclipse.org/adopters/ or https://iot.eclipse.org/adopters/). We used to host a similar users page in a past life, mentioned here).
Why companies who use Eclipse Temurin binaries may want to add their logos to our Adopters page?
Describe the solution you'd like
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
https://ecdtools.eclipse.org/adopters/ and https://ecdtools.eclipse.org/adopters/get-listed/
https://iot.eclipse.org/adopters/ and https://iot.eclipse.org/adopters/how-to-be-listed-as-an-adopter/
We should put extra care into making this a seamless process for our adopters (the less steps and hassle, the better).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: